For the record, the test was meant to test the new partial optimize
capabilities by counting the number of segments available after doing
partial optimizes.
-Grant
On Jul 29, 2008, at 5:58 PM, Tricia Williams wrote:
Works for me!
I don't really understand the purpose of the test, but it
This same thing happens to me since DirectUpdateHandlerOptimizeTest was
added to the repository.
How does one increase the file handle limit in ubuntu?
Thanks,
Tricia
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
Yes, it happens on a fresh checkout too.
cat /proc/sys/fs/file-max gives 204979 on my box. The
You can increase it through /etc/security/limits.conf in ubuntu
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Tricia Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
This same thing happens to me since DirectUpdateHandlerOptimizeTest was
added to the repository.
How does one increase the file handle limit in ubuntu?
I just committed a fix that will make the test use the compound file
format. Hopefully that will be sufficient.
-Yonik
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Tricia Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This same thing happens to me since DirectUpdateHandlerOptimizeTest was
added to the repository.
As of revision 680834 the DirectUpdateHandlerOptimizeTest is still
failing. I haven't made any changes to the file handle limit on my machine.
Tricia
Yonik Seeley wrote:
I just committed a fix that will make the test use the compound file
format. Hopefully that will be sufficient.
-Yonik
OK, I've now scaled back the test by a factor of 10 (50 segments
instead of 500).
-Yonik
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Tricia Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As of revision 680834 the DirectUpdateHandlerOptimizeTest is still failing.
I haven't made any changes to the file handle limit on
Works for me!
I don't really understand the purpose of the test, but it looks like it
is meant as a weak stress test. If the test is significantly scaled
back, is the test still accomplishing what it is mean to do? Should the
onus instead be on the developer to meet a minimum requirement?
Works for me too. Thanks Yonik!
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:28 AM, Tricia Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Works for me!
I don't really understand the purpose of the test, but it looks like it is
meant as a weak stress test. If the test is significantly scaled back, is
the test still
Yes, it happens on a fresh checkout too.
cat /proc/sys/fs/file-max gives 204979 on my box. The test which fails is
testOptimize.
I increased the file handle limit to 4096 but it still fails. Then I
increased it to 16384 and the test passed.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 2:58 AM, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL
Hi,
The DirectUpdateHandlerOptimizeTest fails on my local box due to too many
open files. The nightly build does not fail so I'm assuming it must be
something specific to my setup. Has anyone else seen this problem on their
local environment?
ulimit -n gives 1024 on my Ubuntu Hardy Heron.
Does it happen on a fresh checkout?
I use windows (and cygwin for the familiar command line interface),
which has higher limits.
Also watch out for the system-wide limit:
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/condor/condorg/linux_scalability.html
If it happens with a fresh checkout, perhaps we could lower the
11 matches
Mail list logo