On 8/22/06, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...So you would say LowerCaseFilter instead of LowerCaseFilterFactory...
I like the idea, as long as it's made sufficiently transparent.
For example by logging a warning when a Factory is not found and the
component is created by reflection.
: - if no factory can be found, an attempt will be made to construct
: one dynamically (easiest would be to create a generic factory that
: works via reflection). People could use simple filters w/o creating a
: factory for it.
I think i mentioned this before ... my opinion depends on what the
What do people thing of leaving off Factory from tokenizers and
token filters in schema.xml.
Let the user say what filter they want, not necessarily how to get it.
So you would say LowerCaseFilter instead of LowerCaseFilterFactory.
Implementation details:
- Specification of a Factory would
On 8/22/06, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do people thing of leaving off Factory from tokenizers and
token filters in schema.xml.
Let the user say what filter they want, not necessarily how to get it.
So you would say LowerCaseFilter instead of LowerCaseFilterFactory.
