+1 for the half way deperecation.
Let us keep it in the src till the next major release.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Bill Au wrote:
> +1 for removing from example since they only work on certain OSes. That
> will improve the out-of-the-box experience.
>
> I would like to keep them in src t
+1 for removing from example since they only work on certain OSes. That
will improve the out-of-the-box experience.
I would like to keep them in src to keep this option open to those running
on OSes that are supported since the scripts have been proven to work well.
Bill
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Jun 12, 2009, at 11:07 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Feels like we should remove the replication scripts from example given
that we have a new way of doing replication (we could keep in src...
no biggie).
Should we keep any of the scripts in bin? not sure... but something
On Jun 12, 2009, at 11:07 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Feels like we should remove the replication scripts from example given
that we have a new way of doing replication (we could keep in src...
no biggie).
Should we keep any of the scripts in bin? not sure... but something
like backup should be c
Feels like we should remove the replication scripts from example given
that we have a new way of doing replication (we could keep in src...
no biggie).
Should we keep any of the scripts in bin? not sure... but something
like backup should be changed to use the new snapshooter since that
would wor
