Re: svn commit: r893781 - /lucene/solr/trunk/example/solr/conf/schema.xml

2009-12-24 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Dec 24, 2009, at 10:44 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > So, what do people think about adding this documentation to the point > type... helpful? confusing? +1. I also added some to the Wiki on poly fields under the SchemaXML page. > Opinions on the example schema... should we use subFieldType (i.e

Re: svn commit: r893781 - /lucene/solr/trunk/example/solr/conf/schema.xml

2009-12-24 Thread Yonik Seeley
So, what do people think about adding this documentation to the point type... helpful? confusing? Opinions on the example schema... should we use subFieldType (i.e. have the type create the dynamic field for us) or subFieldSuffix? -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 10: