Hello,
When I had those kind of problems (less complex) with lucene,
the only
idea was to filter from the front-end, according to the ACL policy.
Lucene docs and fields weren't protected, but tagged. Searching was
always applied with a field audience, with hierarchical values like
Hello Hoss
Thanks for replying, I tried what you suggested as the iniital step of my
troubleshooting and it outputs it fine.
It was what I suspected initially as well, but thanks for the advice.
hossman_lucene wrote:
: I'm running solr1.2 and Jetty, I'm having problems looping through a
Hi Yonik
Here's the output from netcat
POST /solr/update HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost:8983
Accept-Encoding: identity
Content-Length: 83
Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
that looks Ok to me, but I am a bit twp you see.
:-)
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 6/13/07, vanderkerkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i write script to get run time to sure how to performance.
i find very intresting thing that i query 2 solr box to get data and solr
response show me qtime all zero.
but i find multi get data script use time is 0.046674966812134(it will
change)
solr box in my pc. and index data is very small.
is it ok?
2007/6/14, vanderkerkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Yonik
Here's the output from netcat
POST /solr/update HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost:8983
Accept-Encoding: identity
Content-Length: 83
Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
that looks Ok to me, but I am a bit twp you see.
:-)
Yonik
I am using solr in my rails application. When I create the document that
need to be stored in Solr I can see the boost values being set on the
fields as attributes. However when I browse the indexes through luke I
see a boost value of 1. What am I missing. Thanks for your input.
-Madhan
Hi all,
I have a problem after updating to solr 1.2. I'm using the bundled jetty
that comes with the latest solr release.
Some of the contents that are stored in my index contain characters from
the unicode private section above 0x10. (They are used by some
proprietary software and the text
Hi
I've been using one Java client I got from a colleague but I don't know
exactly its version or where to get any update for it. Base package is
org.apache.solr.client (where there are some common packages) and the client
main package is org.apache.solr.client.solrj.
Is it available via Maven2
Hi Brian
I've now set the mysqldb to be default charset utf8, and everything else is
utf8. collation etc etc.
I think I know what the problem is, and it's a really old one and I feel
foolish now for not realising it earlier.
Our content people are copying and pasting sh*t from word into the
Is your field defined with omitNorms=true by any chance?
Otis
--
Lucene Consulting -- http://lucene-consulting.com/
- Original Message
From: Madhan Subhas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 5:35:17 AM
Subject: Index time boost is not
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 11:32 +0100, Daniel Alheiros wrote:
Hi
I've been using one Java client I got from a colleague but I don't know
exactly its version or where to get any update for it. Base package is
org.apache.solr.client (where there are some common packages) and the client
main
Thanks Martin.
I'm using one of them which the optimize command doesn't work properly
Have you seen the same problem?
Regards,
Daniel
On 14/6/07 13:07, Martin Grotzke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 11:32 +0100, Daniel Alheiros wrote:
Hi
I've been using one Java client
I think this would be useful. The other day I hit this problem of fq= not
working. It turned out that the schema was changed (some non-indexed fields
were made indexed), the bulk upload was done, but that bulk upload left the old
index files in place, so ended up with double index within
How do you browse the indexes?
On 14/06/07, Otis Gospodnetic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is your field defined with omitNorms=true by any chance?
Otis
--
Lucene Consulting -- http://lucene-consulting.com/
- Original Message
From: Madhan Subhas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Check your schema.xml, that's where you'll see how the field is defined.
Otis
- Original Message
From: Thierry Collogne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 8:27:54 AM
Subject: Re: Index time boost is not working
How do you browse the
The code in http://solrstuff.org/svn/solrj/ is very stable, works with
most all features for both searching and indexing and will be moving
into the main distribution soon as the standard java client library.
- will
-Original Message-
From: Martin Grotzke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tried using that client, but I didn't get any good results while searching
for worst with special characters. I have also searched for documentation
for that client, but didn't find any.
Does anyone know where to find documentation concerning the java client?
On 14/06/07, Will Johnson [EMAIL
Hey all,
i checked out solr and i'm pretty amazed since this could save us a lot
of work. we are working on a document managment system and currently
change the document structure to be valid to predefined schemas. each
document will contain of several 'complex types' what is compareable to
On 6/14/07, James liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i write script to get run time to sure how to performance.
i find very intresting thing that i query 2 solr box to get data and solr
response show me qtime all zero.
but i find multi get data script use time is 0.046674966812134(it will
change)
On 6/14/07, Andreas Balke [Digiden GmbH] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the important point (and first question) is that our schema is very
likely to change. that means we will have 'revisions' of documents
whereas each revision has its own, slightly different, schema.
structuring the documents itself
Can you provide some examples of the searches you were running and the
errors you were getting?
- will
-Original Message-
From: Thierry Collogne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 10:19 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr 1.2 HTTP Client for Java
I
On 6/14/07, Burkamp, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried the new solr 1.2 war file with the old example distribution (solr
1.1 and jetty 5.1). Suprisingly enough this does not reveal the problem. So
the whole story might even be a jetty issue.
That definitely points to it being a Jetty
Otis, here is the setting in the schema for the fields I use. OmitNorms
is not set to any value here. Should explicitly set the value to false.
Thanks
Madhan
fields
field name=id type=string indexed=true stored=true/
field name=default type=text indexed=true stored=false
multiValued=true/
Excellent.
Any idea if you are going to make it distributable via the central Maven
repo?
It could make things easier for those using maven to build their projects...
Like me :)
Regards,
Daniel
On 14/6/07 17:09, Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working on integrating the solrj
Any idea if you are going to make it distributable via the central Maven
repo?
It will be included in the next official solr release. I don't use
maven, but assume all official apache projects are included in their
repo. If they do nightly snapshots, it will be there
ryan
Hi, Chris,
I rewrite the prefix wildcard query consult* to (consult consult?*), it
works with highlighting. Do you think it's a possible solution?
Could you explain a little bit why put a ? before * won't crash solr
if matching a lot of terms?
Thanks
Xuesong
In the trunk (soon to be Solr 1.2)
Ryan McKinley wrote:
Any idea if you are going to make it distributable via the central Maven
repo?
It will be included in the next official solr release. I don't use
maven, but assume all official apache projects are included in their
repo. If they do nightly snapshots, it will be
Hi,
When I tried to use jetty to index my xml, i kept getting the following
error even though I have defined properly in the schema.xml.
The error is -
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.core.SolrException: ERROR:unknown field 'name'...
In my schema, it was defined like this -
filed name=name
On 6/14/07, Tiong Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The error is -
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.core.SolrException: ERROR:unknown field 'name'...
In my schema, it was defined like this -
filed name=name type=string indexed=true stored=true
multiValued=true/
filed = field
-Yonik
: get fresh log messages when the server is started again. The new
: schema.xml that shows the changes is via:
:
: http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/get-file.jsp?file=schema.xml
:
: Maybe there's some extra magic to getting the new field to show up at
: all as null or something valuable? Is that
: I'm having the same issues. We are using Dismax, with a stopword list.
: Currently we are having customers typing in model ipod, we added model to
: the stopwords list and tested with the standard handler..works fine, but not
: with dismax (MM = 3lt;-1 5lt;-2 6lt;90%). When i comment out MM, it
Daniel Alheiros wrote:
Excellent.
I just added SOLR-20 to trunk.
you will need:
1. checkout trunk
2. ant dist
3. include:
apache-solr-1.3-dev-common.jar
apache-solr-1.3-dev-solrj.jar
solrj-lib/*.jar
Here is the basic interface:
I have a large subset (47640) of my total index. Most of them (45335) have a
single field, which we will call Field1. Field1 is a sfloat.
If my query restricts the resultset to my subset and I do a facet count on
Field1, then the number of records returned is 47640. And if I sum up the facet
arh! i spent 6-7 hours on this error and didnt see this! thanks!
On 6/15/07, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/14/07, Tiong Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The error is -
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.core.SolrException: ERROR:unknown field
'name'...
In my schema, it was defined like
Do we have a bug filed on this? Solr really should have complained
about the unknown element. --wunder
On 6/14/07 4:54 PM, Tiong Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
arh! i spent 6-7 hours on this error and didnt see this! thanks!
On 6/15/07, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/14/07,
On 14-Jun-07, at 4:29 PM, Kevin Osborn wrote:
I have a large subset (47640) of my total index. Most of them
(45335) have a single field, which we will call Field1. Field1 is a
sfloat.
If my query restricts the resultset to my subset and I do a facet
count on Field1, then the number of
A 32 bit float has about 7 decimal digits of precision, so your range
queries actually do overlap since 40f is exactly the same as
39f
-Yonik
On 6/14/07, Kevin Osborn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a large subset (47640) of my total index. Most of them (45335) have a
single
SOLR-133 includes this fix... it squawks if it hits an unknown tag.
Walter Underwood wrote:
Do we have a bug filed on this? Solr really should have complained
about the unknown element. --wunder
On 6/14/07 4:54 PM, Tiong Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
arh! i spent 6-7 hours on this error
It happened twice in the past few days that the solr instance stopped
responding (the admin page does not load) while the process was still
running. I'd like to find out what's causing this. I notice that I can
change logger level from admin page but I didn't figure out where the
log files are.
2007/6/14, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 6/14/07, James liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i write script to get run time to sure how to performance.
i find very intresting thing that i query 2 solr box to get data and
solr
response show me qtime all zero.
but i find multi get data script
what version of solr/container are you running?
this sounds similar to what people running solr 1.1 with the jetty
include in that example...
Jack L wrote:
It happened twice in the past few days that the solr instance stopped
responding (the admin page does not load) while the process was
if u use jetty, u should see jetty's log.
if u use tomcat, u should see tomcat's log.
solr is only a program that run with container.
2007/6/15, Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
what version of solr/container are you running?
this sounds similar to what people running solr 1.1 with the
On 14-Jun-07, at 4:30 AM, vanderkerkoff wrote:
Hi Brian
I've now set the mysqldb to be default charset utf8, and everything
else is
utf8. collation etc etc.
I think I know what the problem is, and it's a really old one and I
feel
foolish now for not realising it earlier.
Our content
Yeah, I'm running 1.1 with jetty.
But I didn't find *.log in the whole solr directory.
Is jetty putting the log files outside the directory?
what version of solr/container are you running?
this sounds similar to what people running solr 1.1 with the jetty
include in that example...
Jack
I just downloaded version 1.2 and set it up on my Windows PC.
Search works but Ping returns error 500:
---
HTTP ERROR: 500
Internal Server Error
RequestURI=/solr/admin/ping
Powered by Jetty://
---
Is there any minimum setting for Ping to
: I just downloaded version 1.2 and set it up on my Windows PC.
: Search works but Ping returns error 500:
: Is there any minimum setting for Ping to work?
the ping url triggers a query which can be configured in the
solrconfig.xml, it should work out of the box (even without indexing any
data)
46 matches
Mail list logo