Hello,
Brievly, what I'm looking for is a query that launch
something like this:
Giving the user search expression
A B C D
Generated Lucene query :
(myfield:I OR myfield:J OR myfield:O OR myfield:K)
if someone knows a way to reach this goal, please tell me how, i'm
actually
Hello,
but honestly i haven't relaly tried anything like this ...
the code for
parsing the synonyms.txt file probaly splits the individual
synonyms on
whitespace to prodce multiple tokens which might screw you up
... you may
need to get creative (perhaps use a PatternReplaceFilter to
Done some more digging about this
here's my delete code
def delete(self):
from solr import SolrConnection
c = SolrConnection(host='localhost:8983', persistent=False)
e_url = '/news/' + self.created_at.strftime(%Y/%m/%d) + '/' +
self.slug
e_url =
Different tactic now
adding like this
idstring = news:%s; % self.id
c.add(id=idstring,url_t=e_url,body_t=body4solr,title_t=title4solr,summary_t=summary4solr,contact_name_t=contactname4solr)
c.commit(optimize=True)
Goes in fine, search results show an ID of news:36
Delete like this
Hi folks,
would be using commons-logging an improvement? It is a common
requirement to hook up different logging infrastructure ..
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Jul 11, 2007, at 9:07 PM, solruser wrote:
How do I configure solr to use log4j logging. I am able to
I/my boss and me worked it out.
The delete funtion in solr.py looks like this
def delete(self, id):
xstr = 'deleteid'+self.escapeVal(`id`)+'/id/delete'
return self.doUpdateXML(xstr)
As we're not passing an integer it get's all c*nty booby, technical term.
So if I rewrite the delete to
Hi Erik,
the troubles comes when you integrate third-party stuff depending on
log4j (as I currently do). Having said this you have a strong point when
looking at http://www.qos.ch/logging/classloader.jsp
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Jul 12, 2007, at 9:03 AM, Siegfried
QUESTION:
Jeryl Cook
^ Pharaoh ^
http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/
I need to make solr work with java 1.4, the orgnaization I work for has not
approved java 1.5 for the network...Before I download the source code and
see if this is possible, what do u guys thing the level of effort will be?
Oh, and please don't cross-post :-)
On 7/12/07, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/12/07, Jery Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/
I need to make solr work with java 1.4, the orgnaization I work for has not
approved java 1.5 for the network...Before I
Hello, I would like to generate a list of facets, let's say on 5 fields. I
have the facet limit set to 5 so that for each of the 5 fields there will only
by up to 5 values.
My question is: Is there a way to change the limit per field? Let's say on
facet 2 I would like to display 10 values
On 7/12/07, Andrew Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is: Is there a way to change the limit per field? Let's say on
facet 2 I would like to display 10 values instead of 5 like the other facets.
From the wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters
Parameters
These are
solr requires 1.5. It uses generics and a bunch of other 1.5 code.
Jery Cook wrote:
QUESTION:
Jeryl Cook
^ Pharaoh ^
http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/
I need to make solr work with java 1.4, the orgnaization I work for has not
approved java 1.5 for the network...Before I download the
On 12-Jul-07, at 6:33 AM, vanderkerkoff wrote:
I/my boss and me worked it out.
The delete funtion in solr.py looks like this
def delete(self, id):
xstr = 'deleteid'+self.escapeVal(`id`)+'/id/delete'
return self.doUpdateXML(xstr)
As we're not passing an integer it get's all c*nty
That change doesn't have anything to do with where snappuller place the
snapshots.
Is the environment variable data_dir set up correctly in conf/scripts.conf?
That's where
snappuller puts the snapshots.
Bill
On 7/12/07, Kevin Lewandowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been running solr
Hello!
I'm trying to remove a whole brand from our search index, but at the
same time we're also running an import for others. This means the
index is extreamly active at this time.
I am getting a lock timeout error, but not sure what to do about
it... should I just keep trying till it
It looks like somehow the write.lock got hung. I manually removed the
lock, and now things are good.
Very strange.
++
| Matthew Runo
| Zappos Development
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| 702-943-7833
I was going to say... that exception should never happen since solr
controls and synchronizes adds/deletes at a higher layer (with only
one solr instance accessing an index, we don't really need lucene
level locking at all).
One major cause of this is a crash/restart of the JVM leaving a stale
On 12-Jul-07, at 6:25 PM, Lance Lance wrote:
A simplified version of the problem:
text -(collection:pile1)
works, while
text (-collection:pile1)
finds zero records.
see my other message. You cannot create a (sub)query with only
prohibited clauses. The second query asks:
Q = find
: Solr can process the query which has NOT operator (-) in the head.
: If Solr find it, Solr adds MatchAllDocsQuery automatically
: in the front of that query as follows:
thta's not strictly true ... Solr doesn't *add* a MatchAllDocsQuery if the
query is entirely prohibitive, instead Solr
: The one issue I ran into was with daily rolling log files - maybe I
: missed it, but I didn't find that functionality in the JDK logging
: package, however it is in log4j.
:
: I'm not advocating a change, just noting this. We worked around it by
: leveraging Resin's support for wrapping a
20 matches
Mail list logo
