Thanks, Hoss! I would recommend go with 1.2.
regards,
-Hui
On 8/17/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> : I wonder what are the production experience of Solr 1.2 vs. 1.1. We are
> : thinking of using 1.2 as opposed to 1.1 to support a mission critical
> : application, but am no
: I wonder what are the production experience of Solr 1.2 vs. 1.1. We are
: thinking of using 1.2 as opposed to 1.1 to support a mission critical
: application, but am not sure whether 1.2. is stable enough ( afraid of
it's plenty stable. if you (or someone else) were already using Solr 1.1
and
: - make sure that you only store fields you need to retrieve... if you
: only need to search on the fields, make them indexed-only.
and omitNorms on any fields were you don't need lengthNormilization or
field boosts (ie: date fields, numeric fields, boolean flag fields,
etc...)
-Hoss
Hi, there,
I wonder what are the production experience of Solr 1.2 vs. 1.1. We are
thinking of using 1.2 as opposed to 1.1 to support a mission critical
application, but am not sure whether 1.2. is stable enough ( afraid of
things like more features may introduce new bugs). However, 1.1. librar
Hi Jae Joo,
Please provide a bit more information about exactly what you are trying to
achieve so we can help you.
cheers,
Piete
On 18/08/07, Jae Joo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone help me how to do sub faces?
> Thanks,
>
> Jae Joo
>
On 8/17/07, Kevin Lewandowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there any tips on reducing the index size or what factors most
> impact index size?
>
> My index has 2.7 million documents and is 200 gigabytes and growing.
> Most documents are around 2-3kb and there are about 30 indexed fields.
Wow,
Are there any tips on reducing the index size or what factors most
impact index size?
My index has 2.7 million documents and is 200 gigabytes and growing.
Most documents are around 2-3kb and there are about 30 indexed fields.
thanks,
Kevin
Thanks, guys.
Glad to know the scripts work very well in your experience. (well, indeed
they are quite simple.) So that's how I imagine we should do it except that
you guys added a very good point -- that the monitoring system can invoke a
script to take the slave out of the load balancer. I'd li
Got it. Thanks Hoss!
regards,
-Hui
On 8/16/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> : Any of you know whether the new "q:*.*" query performs better than the
> : get-around solutions like using a ranged query? I would guess so, but I
> : haven't looked into the Lucene implementation.
Hi,
Can anyone help me how to do sub faces?
Thanks,
Jae Joo
This may be your problem. The below docs are for the HTTP connector,
simlar configuration can be made to the AJP and other connectors
See
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/config/http.html
URIEncoding
This specifies the character encoding used to decode the URI bytes,
after %xx decodin
You might want to check out this page
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat
Tomcat needs a small config change out of the box to properly support UTF-8.
Thanks,
Charlie
-Original Message-
From: Mario Knezovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 12:58 PM
To: solr-
Hello-
The Lucene interface is cool, but not many people put their indexes on
machines with Swing access.
I just did a Solr integration by copying the eTools.ch implementation. This
took several edits. As long as we're making requests, please do a
general-pupose implementation by cloning the Luce
Hi all,
I have set up an identical Solr 1.1 on two different machines. One works
fine, the other one has a UTF-8 encoding problem.
#1 is my local Windows XP machine. Solr is running basically in a
configuration like in the tutorial example with Jetty/5.1.11RC0 (Windows
XP/5.1 x86 java/1.6.0). Eve
Thanks Karl. I'll check it out!
On 8/18/07, karl wettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I updated LUCENE-626 last night. It should now run smooth without
> LUCENE-550, but smoother with.
>
> Perhaps it is something you can use.
>
>
> 12 aug 2007 kl. 14.24 skrev climbingrose:
>
> > I'm happy to cont
If snapinstaller fails to install the lastest snapshot, then chances are
that it would be able to install any earlier snapshots as well. All it does
is some very simple filesystem operations and then invoke the Solr server to
do a commit. I agree with Chris that the best thing to do is to take it
I updated LUCENE-626 last night. It should now run smooth without
LUCENE-550, but smoother with.
Perhaps it is something you can use.
12 aug 2007 kl. 14.24 skrev climbingrose:
I'm happy to contribute code for the SpellCheckerRequestHandler.
I'll post
the code once I strip off stuff relate
Hi All,
I've just filed an issue for us related to this:
http://issues.carrot2.org/browse/CARROT-106
I'll try to find some spare cycles to look into it, hopefully in some not
too distant future. Meanwhile, feel free to post your thoughts and concerns
on this either here or on our JIRA.
Thanks,
18 matches
Mail list logo