: So for example, to pop one document to the top of the index, i just run:
:
: "&q=field: value; id_700390+desc, date+desc"
:
: Works like a charm, even with multiple documents.
:
: "&q=field: value; id_700390+desc, id_604030+desc, date+desc"
be wary of this, sorting on a field (even a dynamic
: Think of the "name" field as less-important metadata field and "manu" as
: the more important and longer content field. When a person enters foo
: bar baz, I want to avoid matches in the manu/content field caused by
: matches of individual terms (that is why I removed manu field from the
: "
I had put the jar in the wrong place
say, you have the example-server homedirectory in front of you (with
start.jar in it). Say this is $home.
you have to put the custom requesthandler in: $home/solr/lib (you have to
almost certainly create this directory)
instead of: $home/lib (which probably al
Don't know if you ever found a fix for this issue, but I saw experienced it
tonight while trying to run solr through jetty in eclipse. The custom
RequestHandler plugin was loading fine when running jetty normally from the
command-line, but running it through eclipse hit the ClassCastException.
I
On 10/24/07, Norskog, Lance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am creating a filter that is never used. Here is the query sequence:
>
> q=*:*&fq=contentid:00*&start=0&rows=200
>
> q=*:*&fq=contentid:00*&start=200&rows=200
>
> q=*:*&fq=contentid:00*&start=400&rows=200
>
> q=*:*&fq=contentid:00*&start=60
Thanks.. I'll do that
sunrise1984 wrote:
> Maybe the following is useful for you.(It comes from
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat)
>
> If you are going to query Solr using international characters (>127) using
> HTTP-GET, you must configure Tomcat to conform to the URI standard by
> accep
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-392
Summary:
It would be good for end-user applications if Solr allowed searches to
cease before finishing, and still return partial results.
Maybe the following is useful for you.(It comes from
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat)
If you are going to query Solr using international characters (>127) using
HTTP-GET, you must configure Tomcat to conform to the URI standard by accepting
percent-encoded UTF-8.
Edit Tomcat's conf/serv
On 10/24/07, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm in the middle of bringing up a new solr server and am using the
> trunk. (where I was using an earlier nightly release of about 2-3 weeks
> ago on my old server)
>
> now, when I do a search for "日本" (japan) it used to show the kanji
Hi.
I'm in the middle of bringing up a new solr server and am using the
trunk. (where I was using an earlier nightly release of about 2-3 weeks
ago on my old server)
now, when I do a search for "日本" (japan) it used to show the kanji in
the area, but now it shows gibberish instead "æ¥æ¬"
Are you running off of a release? onlyMorePopular was only
implemented in the trunk a few days ago (in earlier versions, even if
you specified onlyMorePopular, it was ignored).
dave
On Oct 24, 2007, at 5:58 PM, Justin Knoll wrote:
I'm running the example Solr install with a custom schema.x
I'm running the example Solr install with a custom schema.xml and
solrconfig.xml. I'm seeing some unexpected results for searches using
the SpellCheckerRequestHandler using the onlyMorePopular option.
Namely, searching for certain terms with onlyMorePopular set to true
returns a suggestion
Isn't this what ISOLatin1Filter does? Turn Björk into Bjork? This should be
much faster than PatternReplaceFilterFactory.
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Eireiner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 1:47 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: AW: Converti
Hi,
I'm using DisMaxRequestHandler and trying to transform a user-entered
multi-term boolean query (e.g. foo bar baz).
I've configured DisMaxRH like so:
name^1.2 <-- I removed the manu field from here -->
manu^1.4
0 <-- try to requi
Dear list,
it has been some time, but here is what I did.
I had a look at Thomas Traeger's tip to use the
SnowballPorterFilterFactory, which does not actually do the job.
Its purpose is to convert regular ASCII into special characters.
And I want it the other way, such that all special character
That's the ticket exactly, Kyle.
What I have is the ID of my document, so I indexed a dynamic field
with name id_*. Then I just set that field for each document with the
proper ID.
So for example, to pop one document to the top of the index, i just run:
"&q=field: value; id_700390+desc, da
> The typical use case, though, is for the featured document to be on top only
> for certain queries. Like in an intranet where someone queries 401K or
> retirement or similar, you want to feature a document about benefits that
> would otherwise rank really low for that query. I have not be able
The typical use case, though, is for the featured document to be on top only
for certain queries. Like in an intranet where someone queries 401K or
retirement or similar, you want to feature a document about benefits that
would otherwise rank really low for that query. I have not be able to make
Mike Klaas wrote:
> On 24-Oct-07, at 7:10 AM, Alf Eaton wrote:
>> Yes, I was just trying that this morning and it's an improvement, though
>> not ideal if the field contains a lot of text (in other words it's still
>> a suboptimal workaround).
>>
>> I do think it might be useful for the response to
Hi,
This is what I intended to do with my impl. Create a Multi-Valued filed
for the schema. Then when you prepare the document which you want to send it
to the SOLR to index, for examples
1234
...
...
Java
.Net
And the next question of your to get the count do the facet on this
Took the words right out my mouth! That second method would be
particularly effective but will only work if you can identify these docs
at index time.
-Original Message-
From: Kyle Banerjee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 1:31 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.o
On 24-Oct-07, at 7:10 AM, Alf Eaton wrote:
Yes, I was just trying that this morning and it's an improvement,
though
not ideal if the field contains a lot of text (in other words it's
still
a suboptimal workaround).
I do think it might be useful for the response to contain an element
sayin
On 24-Oct-07, at 10:56 AM, Charlie Jackson wrote:
Yes, this will only work if the results are sorted by score (the
default).
One thing I thought of after I sent this out was that this will
include
the specified document even if it doesn't match your search criteria,
which may not be what you
This method Charlie suggested will work just fine with a minor tweak.
For relevancy sorting
?q=foo OR (foo AND id:bar)
For nonrelevancy sorting, all you need is a multilevel sort. Just add
a bogus field that only the important document contains. Then sort by
bogus field in descending order before
I'm going to be doing something similar, and I don't think I'll be
sorting by score (although, that might be feasible). In my use-case
though, we don't want to include something unless it is already matched
by our filters. I'll probably end up just making two search hits, but
it would be nice if
Yes, this will only work if the results are sorted by score (the
default).
One thing I thought of after I sent this out was that this will include
the specified document even if it doesn't match your search criteria,
which may not be what you want.
-Original Message-
From: mark angelil
Charlie,
That's interesting. I did try something like this. Did you try your
query with a sorting parameter?
What I've read suggests that all the results are returned based on
the query specified, but then resorted as specified. Boosting (which
modifies the document's score) should not ch
Do you know which document you want at the top? If so, I believe you
could just add an "OR" clause to your query to boost that document very
high, such as
?q=foo OR id:bar^1000
Tried this on my installation and it did, indeed push the document
specified to the top.
-Original Message-
Thanks. I am trying to implement some sort authentication mechanism in Solr.
This means each request will have a key which can authenticate whether the
request is authentic or not. And do you think, I need to still take care the
steps mentioned by you and why??
- BR
"Wagner,Harry" <[EMAI
Solr does not do security itself. Servlet containers usually support
various security options: account/password through HTTP authentication
(very weak security) and certificates (very strong security) are what I
would look at first.
Lance
-Original Message-
From: Wagner,Harry [mailto:[EMA
On 10/24/07, Alf Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to use the bf parameter to boost a dismax query based on the value
> of a certain (integer) field. The trouble is that for some of the documents
> this field is empty (rather than zero), which means that there's an error
> when using
One effective method is to block access to the port Solr runs on. Force
application access to come thru the HTTP server, and let it map to the
application server (i.e., like mod_jk does for for Apache & Tomcat).
Simple, but effective.
Cheers!
harry
-Original Message-
From: Cool Coder [mai
I'm trying to use the bf parameter to boost a dismax query based on the value
of a certain (integer) field. The trouble is that for some of the documents
this field is empty (rather than zero), which means that there's an error when
using the bf parameter:
-
select?q=query+string&qf=body&qt
Hi Group,
As far as I know, to use solr, we need to deploy it as a server
and communicate to solr using http protocol. How about its security? i.e. how
can we ensure that it only accepts request from predefined set of users only.
Is there any way we can specify this in solr or so
I'd love to know this, as I just got a development request for this
very feature. I'd rather not spend time on it if it already exists.
++
| Matthew Runo
| Zappos Development
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| 702-943-7833
+
Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On 10/24/07, Alf Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yonik Seeley wrote:
>>> Could you perhaps index the captions as
>>> #1 this is the first caption
>>> #2 this is the second caption
>>>
>>> And then when just look for #n in the highlighted results?
>>> For display, you could
On 10/24/07, Alf Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yonik Seeley wrote:
> > Could you perhaps index the captions as
> > #1 this is the first caption
> > #2 this is the second caption
> >
> > And then when just look for #n in the highlighted results?
> > For display, you could also strip out the #n
Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On 8/16/07, Alf Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 16 Aug 2007, at 17:20, Alf Eaton wrote:
>>
>>> When searching a multiValued field, is it possible to know which of
>>> the multiple fields the match was in?
>>>
>>> For example if I have an index of documents, each of whic
If you do want more stopwords sources, there is this one too:
http://snowball.tartarus.org/algorithms/
And I would go for the language identification and then I would apply the
proper set.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 18/10/07 16:18, "Maria Mosolova" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks a lot Peter!
> Mar
39 matches
Mail list logo
