Yep got that.
Thanks.
/M
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With Lance's MD5 schema you'd do this:
>
> 1 shard: 0-f*
> 2 shards: 0-8*, 9-f*
> 3 shards: 0-5*, 6-a*, b-f*
> 4 shards: 0-3*, 4-7*, 8-b*, c-f*
> ...
> 16 shards: 0*, 1*, 2*... d*, e*, f
Hi All,
I need to develop a language analyzer to implement multilingual search. It
will be very useful if I get any sample language analyzer and a sample data
used to index with that analyzer.
thanks in advance..,
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Language-Analyser-tp17
Hi all,
I've having some problems getting faceting to work correctly on date
fields. For each document I index in solr I store a created date.
ie. 1993-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
What I'm trying to do is for any search query, facet on year part of the
created date using:
facet.date = created_date_dt
f.
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:38:15 +0200
"Roberto Nieto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Otis,
>
> Thanks a lot for your interest.
>
> The main thing i cant understand very well is that if I have 8 maquines that
> will be searchers, for example, why they will have a higher cost of hw if I
> have one b
Hi Otis,
I think that my questions were not very well formulated.
We have dedicate machines for parsing, 2 machines (active/pasive) for
indexing, the index allocated in a SAN filesystem and dedicate machines for
searching.
All of my questions came because if i have an index of 300gb i dont know h
With Lance's MD5 schema you'd do this:
1 shard: 0-f*
2 shards: 0-8*, 9-f*
3 shards: 0-5*, 6-a*, b-f*
4 shards: 0-3*, 4-7*, 8-b*, c-f*
...
16 shards: 0*, 1*, 2*... d*, e*, f*
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Marcus Herou <[
Roberto,
All I was trying to say that it *might* be cheaper to buy:
10 smaller servers with 4 GB RAM each, for a total of 40 GB RAM
than
1 big server with 40 GB RAM and the CPU matching the CPU power of 10 smaller
servers
Of course, there are other things to consider, too - power usage, hosting
Hi Yonik,
I think your are right, it must be that.
If i activate the highlighting of a field that i´m not specifing in "fl", it
will have the same use of RAM as if i return it?
Internally it will be as if I add it to "fl"?
2008/6/13 Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3
Hi Otis,
Thanks a lot for your interest.
The main thing i cant understand very well is that if I have 8 maquines that
will be searchers, for example, why they will have a higher cost of hw if I
have one big index. If I have 10 smaller indexes I will need
to search over all of them so...that won´t
