When adding documents to solr, the searcher will not be replaced, but once
you do a commit, (dependening on settings) a new searcher will be opened
and warmed up while the old searcher will still be open and used when
searching. Once the new searcher has finished its warmup procedure, the
o
Sorry missed that (and probably dumb question), does that -D flag work
for setting as a RAMDirectory as well?
- Jon
On Nov 30, 2008, at 8:42 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
OK, the development version of Solr should now be fixed (i.e. NIO
should be the default for non-Windows platforms). The next n
Hi Fergie,
Haven't forgotten about you, but I've been traveling and then into
some US Holidays here.
To confirm I am understanding, you are seeing a slowdown between 1.3-
dev from April and one from September, right?
Can you produce an MD5 hash of the WAR file or something, such that I
c
Hi,
I have huge index files to query. On a first cut calculation it looks like I
would need around 3 boxes (each box not more than 125 M records of size 12.5GB)
for around 25 apps - so all together 75 boxes.
However the number of concurrent users would be lesser - may not be more than
20 at
OK, the development version of Solr should now be fixed (i.e. NIO
should be the default for non-Windows platforms). The next nightly
build (Dec-01-2008) should have the changes.
-Yonik
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> NIO support in the latest Solr devel
Hi All,
Say I have started a new Solr server instance using the start.jar in java
command. Now for this Solr server instance when all a new Searcher would be
created ?
I am aware of following scenarios -
1. When the instance is started for autowarming a new Searcher is created. But
not sure w
Adding constraints obtained from facets is best done using fq anyway,
so it's worth making that switch in your client code anyway.
Erik
On Nov 30, 2008, at 10:43 AM, Peter Wolanin wrote:
Hi Grant,
Thanks for your feedback. The major short-term downside to switching
to dismax with m
Hi Grant,
Thanks for your feedback. The major short-term downside to switching
to dismax with multiple fields would be the required re-writing of our
current PHP code - especially our code to handle addition of facets
fields to the q parameter. From reading about dismax, seems we would
need to
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 2:04 AM, Naomi Dushay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The terms component approach, if i understand it correctly, will be
> problematic. I need to present not only the next X call numbers in
> sequence, but other fields in those documents (e.g. title, author).
You can still u
Hi Peter,
What are the downsides to your last alternative approach below? That
seems like the simplest approach and should work as long as the terms
within those fields do not need to be boosted separately.
If you want to go the boosting terms route, this is handled via a
thing called Pa
10 matches
Mail list logo
