Hi Yonik.
You have really made a great job.=)
Here are my benchmark results:
With the current class :
- 10 users : 860 queries / Average time 0.511 sec
- 50 users : 1335 queries / Average time 8.264 sec
- 100 users : 1358 queries / Average time 18.703 sec
With the
Hello Grant,
Haven't forgotten about you, but I've been traveling and then into
some US Holidays here.
Happy thanks giving!
To confirm I am understanding, you are seeing a slowdown between 1.3-
dev from April and one from September, right?
Yep.
Here are the MD5 hashes:-
fergus: md5 *.war
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Jon Baer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry missed that (and probably dumb question), does that -D flag work for
setting as a RAMDirectory as well?
Nope... that's implemented only in FSDirectory to specify a specific
subclass implementation (which RAMDirectory is
I increased this param to 10MB and still got the same exception. I
doubt my HTTP requests are exceeding 10MB. I can rerun everything
again and log the sizes of the requests, just to be 100% sure, but
this will take some time. The stacktrace appears when
the Lucene index is around 30 GB. Could
Is it possible to send a request to admin/luke using the EmbeddedSolrServer?
Hi all,
I'm looking for ideas about how to best deal with a situation where I
need to deal with storing key/values pairs in the index for consumption
in the client.
Typical example would be to have a document with multiple genres where
for simplicity reasons i'd like to send both the 'id'
Hello,
I am putting together some performance comparisons of LuSql[1] and
Solr's Data Import Request Handler[2], JdbcDataSource[3]. I want to
make sure I am comparing apples with apples, so would appreciate the
community helping me to make sure I am doing so.
First, LuSql default uses Lucene's
In the end lucene stores stuff as strings.
Even if you do store your data as map FieldType , Solr May not be able
to treat it like a map.
So it is fine to put is the map as one single string
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Stephane Bailliez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking for
sure:
LukeRequest luke = new LukeRequest();
luke.setShowSchema( false );
LukeResponse rsp = luke.process( server );
On Dec 1, 2008, at 11:42 AM, Matt Mitchell wrote:
Is it possible to send a request to admin/luke using the
EmbeddedSolrServer?
Hello everyone,
I'm trying to index on an Oracle DB, but can't seem to find any built in
support for objects of type oracle.sql.Clob. The field I try to put the data
into is of type text, but after indexing it only contains the Clob-objects
string representation, i.e. something like [EMAIL
Hello all,
I'm having this issue and I hope I get some help.. :)
This following happens quite often ... even though searching and indexing are
on a safe side...
SolrException: HTTP code=503, reason=Error opening new searcher. exceeded
limit of maxWarmingSearchers=4, try again later.
I
Hi ToddFeak,
thanks for your response...
solr version is 1.3. Roughly about every 4 minutes there are indexing/updaing
of 4 to 10 documents that is from multiple clients to one master server...
It is also worth mentioning that I have
postCommit
Thanks for your reply!
I'm already using the DataImportHandler for indexing. Do I still have to
convert the Clob myself or are there any built-in functions that I've
missed?
// Joel
2008/12/1 Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you are querying Oracle yourself and using something like SolrJ,
Subject: RE: maxWarmingSearchers
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:35:53 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Ok sounds reasonable. When you index/update those 4-10 documents, are
you doing a single commit? OR are you doing a commit after each one?
well, commits after
The commit after each one may be hurting you.
I believe that a new searcher is created after each commit. That searcher then
runs through its warm up, which can be costly depending on your warming
settings. Even if it's not overly costly, creating another one while the first
one is running
thanks for your explanation and time :)
Subject: RE: maxWarmingSearchers
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:57:59 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
The commit after each one may be hurting you.
I believe that a new searcher is created after each commit. That
Just to confirm. The query works if written as in Yonik's comment.
Thanks
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 8:33 PM, outre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if function queries are supported in SOLR1.3?
I looked thru http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery, and
Hi Joel,
DIH does not translate Clob automatically to text.
We can open that as an issue.
meanwhile you can write a transformer of your own to read Clob and
convert to text.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#head-4756038c418ab3fa389efc822277a7a789d27688
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:57
I have raised a new issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-891
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Joel,
DIH does not translate Clob automatically to text.
We can open that as an issue.
meanwhile you can write a transformer of your
19 matches
Mail list logo
