On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 3:51 AM, Michael Lugassy mlu...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using something along ?q=_val_:product(field1,0.5) and was
wondering whether I could facet with category_id so that I get the
single best document (product) for each category_id (not intrested in
more than 5 of the
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Ranjit Raveendran
contact_ranjit_...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I had emailed before about the following issue but did not get a response.
I have been trying to reload the Solr core after I make changes to the
synonyms.txt file. With Solr 1.3, I am able to do a
I am faced with the requirement for a boolean query composed of 50,000
clauses (all of them directed at the same field) all OR'ed together.
I know that maxClauseCount can be set arbitrarily, but I am wondering
whether this kind of query would chock and how scalable are this kind of
queries
intresting. will that patch work in 1.4?
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Shalin Shekhar
Mangarshalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 3:51 AM, Michael Lugassy mlu...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using something along ?q=_val_:product(field1,0.5) and was
wondering whether I could facet
Hi Shalin,
Thank you for the reply.
I do re-index the documents after a reload (which, in turn is done after I
change the synonyms file) before submitting any queries. I.e. I do the
following:
a) change the synonyms file.
b) reload the index (this *does not work in Solr 1.3* but works file in
I did test it, one unit test currently fails.
On Jul 24, 2009, at 9:34 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Peter Wolaninpeter.wola...@acquia.com
wrote:
Sadly, I had to muis the meetup in NYC, but looking over the slides
: You are correct, it's not a Solr issue, its due to HTTP GET is not being
: able to send such a large request.
:
: But now the question is, Solr only accepts request in url form not as
: request parameter or request object. That's the main issue. Hence we
: need to send the query in url form
: Subject: End-user documentation
: References: 85d3c3b60907191934p4c0e63ceuf2712a17cea52...@mail.gmail.com
: In-Reply-To: 85d3c3b60907191934p4c0e63ceuf2712a17cea52...@mail.gmail.com
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists
When starting a new discussion
: It seems that SolrQuery is a better API than the basic ModifiableSolrParams,
: but I can't make it work.
can you elaborate a bit more on what it is you are tyring to do? ... ie:
show more of hte unit test you are writing ... what exactly are you doing
with the SolrQuery and/or
it is not explicitly mentioned in solr documentation but I guess when
changing stuff inside conf/ folder a restart of webserver is necessary?
Or is there a reload URL call available?
--
manuel aldana
ald...@gmx.de
software-engineering blog: http://www.aldana-online.de
On Jul 26, 2009, at 3:53 PM, manuel aldana wrote:
it is not explicitly mentioned in solr documentation but I guess
when changing stuff inside conf/ folder a restart of webserver is
necessary? Or is there a reload URL call available?
In single core, a restart of Solr is required to pick up
apparently it does. what a great contriibution! got it to work with
1.4-dev. hopefully it will get into the stable release.
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Michael Lugassymlu...@gmail.com wrote:
intresting. will that patch work in 1.4?
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Shalin Shekhar
hi,
I am having queries:
+a b
a b
I always wondered why the + operator did not work. Looking at the
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/analysis.jsp analysis trace the query
analzyer indeed is removing the + through the
WordDelemiterFilterFactory. So I removed this filter (btw: why is this
the
manuel aldana wrote:
hi,
I am having queries:
+a b
a b
I always wondered why the + operator did not work. Looking at the
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/analysis.jsp analysis trace the query
analzyer indeed is removing the + through the
WordDelemiterFilterFactory. So I removed this filter
14 matches
Mail list logo
