This thread all sounds really kludgy ... among other things the
newSearcher listener is going to need to some how keep track of when it
was called as a result of a "real" commit, vs when it was called as the
result of a commit it itself triggered to make changes.
wouldn't an easier place to im
I'm not really understanding how you could get the situation you describe
... which suggests that one (or both) of us don't understand exactly what
happened.
if you can post the actual schema.xml file you used and an example of the
input you indexed perhaps we can spot the discrepency.
FWIW:
: Hi, I am try to get the next DocList "page" in my custom search component.
: Could I get a code example of this?
you just increase the "offset" value you pass to
SolrIndexSearcher.getDocList by whatever your page size is. (if you use
the newer QueryCommand versions you just call setOffset wi
: I'm using solr build 2009-06-16_08-06-14, in multicore configuration.
: When I issue the update command "optimize" to a core, the index files
: are locked and never released. Calling the coreAdmin unload method on
: the core unload the core but does not unlock the underlying index files.
: The
If you make your EventListener implements SolrCoreAware you can get
hold of the core on inform. use that to get hold of the
SolrIndexWriter
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Marc Sturlese wrote:
>
> From the newSearcher(..) of a CustomEventListener which extends of
> AbstractSolrEventListener can
: > Normally to optimize an index you POST to /solr/update. Is
: > there any way to POST an optimize message to one instance and have it
: > propagate to all shards sort of like the select?
: >
: > /solr-shard-1/select?q=dog... shards=shard-1,shard2
: No, you'll need to send optimize to each ho
Hey Ken,
Thanks for your reply.
When I wrote '5|6' I ment that this is a multiValued field with two values
'5' and '6', rather than the literal string '5|6' (and any Tokenizer). Does
your reply still holds? That is, are multiValued fields dependent on the
notion of tokenization to such a degree so
Reuben Firmin wrote:
Is it expected behaviour that "deleteById" will always return OK as a
status, regardless of whether the id was matched?
It is expected behaviour as Solr always returns 0 unless an error occurs
during processing a request (query, update, ...), so you don't need to check
t
I just updated to nightly build (I was using 1.2) and this does not
seem to be an issue anymore.
2009/7/29 Jón Helgi Jónsson :
> Hey now!
>
> I do index time boosting for my fields and just discovered that when
> searching with a trailing wild card the boosting is ignored.
>
> Will my boosting wor
Don't forget this is tonight! Excited to see everyone there.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Bradford
Stephens wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> SLIGHT change of plans.
>
> A few people have asked me to move to a place with Air Conditioning,
> since the temperature's in the 90's this week. So, here we
I created an issue and have added some notes
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1316
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Jason
Rutherglen wrote:
> Here's a good article on Ternary Trees: http://www.ddj.com/windows/184410528
>
> I looked at the one in Lucene, I don't understand why the find me
Is it expected behaviour that "deleteById" will always return OK as a
status, regardless of whether the id was matched?
I have a unit test:
// set up the test data
engine.index(12345, s1, d1);
engine.index(54321, s2, d2);
engine.index(23453, s3, d3);
// ...
@Test
public void t
Could very well be... I will rectify it and try again. Thanks
- ashok
Robert Muir wrote:
>
> it appears there is an encoding problem, in the screenshot I can see
> the title is mangled, and if i open up the URL in IE or firefox, both
> browsers think it is iso-8859-1.
>
> I think this is why
it appears there is an encoding problem, in the screenshot I can see
the title is mangled, and if i open up the URL in IE or firefox, both
browsers think it is iso-8859-1.
I think this is why (from w3c validator):
Character Encoding mismatch!
The character encoding specified in the HTTP header (
Here's a good article on Ternary Trees: http://www.ddj.com/windows/184410528
I looked at the one in Lucene, I don't understand why the find method
only returns a char/int?
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Robert Petersen wrote:
> Simple minded autosuggest can just not tokenize the phrases at all
Sure.
The java command I use with TIKA to extract text from a URL is:
java -jar tika-0.3-standalone.jar -t $url
I have also attached the screenshots of the web page, post documents
produced in the two different ways (Perl & Tika) for that web page, and the
screenshots of the search result for a
Simple minded autosuggest can just not tokenize the phrases at all and
so the wildcards just complete whatever the user has typed so far
including spaces. Upon encountering a space though, autosuggest should
wait to make more suggestions until the user has typed at least a couple
of letters of the
also watch out that you have a good stopwords list otherwise the
suggestions won't be helpful for the user.
Jack Bates wrote:
how can i use solr to make search suggestions? i'm thinking google-style
suggestions, which suggests more refined queries - vs. freebase-style
suggestions, which suggest
That did it, thanks!
I thought that was how it should work, but I guess somehow I got out of sync or
something at one point which led me to dive deeper into it than I needed to.
-Original Message-
From: AHMET ARSLAN [mailto:iori...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 12:52 PM
To:
In order to match (query) XYZ1* to (document) XYZ123 you do not need
WordDelimiterFilterFactory. You need an tokenizer that recognizes XYZ123 as one
token. And WhitespaceTokenizer is one of them.
As I see from the fieldType named text_ws, you want to use
WhitespaceTokenizerFactory
and there is
This was the definition I was last working with (I've been playing with setting
the various parameters).
-Original Message-
From: AHMET ARSLAN [mailto:iori...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
I thought the Lucene and Solr communities would find this interesting:
My collaborators and I have used LuSql, Lucene and Semantic Vectors to
visualize a large scale semantic journal space (kind of like 'Maps of
Science') of a large
scale (5.7 million articles) journal article collection using only
http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_4_0/api/org/apache/lucene/analysis/compound/hyphenation/TernaryTree.html
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Jason
Rutherglen wrote:
> Autosuggest is something that would be very useful to build into
> Solr as many search projects require it.
>
> I'd recommend indexin
Autosuggest is something that would be very useful to build into
Solr as many search projects require it.
I'd recommend indexing relevant terms/phrases into a Ternary
Search Tree which is compact and performant. Using a wildcard
query will likely not be as fast as a Ternary Tree, and I'm not
sure
You may index your data using a delimiter, like $my-field-content$. While
searching, perform a phrase query with the leading and trailing "$" appended
to the query string.
Cheers
Avlesh
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Sushan Rungta wrote:
> I tried using AND, but it even provided me doc 3 whi
> What analyzer, tokenizer, filter factory would I need to
> use to get wildcard matching to match where:
> Value:
> XYZ123
> Query:
> XYZ1*
StandardAnalyzer, WhitespaceAnalyzer.
> I have been messing with solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory
> splitOnNumerics and oreserveOriginal in both the analyz
Hi,
What analyzer, tokenizer, filter factory would I need to use to get wildcard
matching to match where:
Value:
XYZ123
Query:
XYZ1*
I have been messing with solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory splitOnNumerics and
oreserveOriginal in both the analyzer and the query. I also noticed it is
different
Hi,
We're using Lucid Imagination's LucidWorks Solr 1.3 and we have a requirement
to implement multiple-select faceting where the facet cells show up as
checkboxes and despite checked options, all of the options continue to persist
with counts. The best example I found is the search on Lucid Im
Hi Kevin,
The parameter names have changed in the latest Solr 1.4 builds... please see
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Kevin
Miller wrote:
> I am working with Solr 1.4 nightly and am running it on a Wi
Hi Ravi,
This may help:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HierarchicalFaceting
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: ravi.gidwani [mailto:ravi.gidw...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 3:24 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: refering/alias other Solr documents
>
>
> H
Hey now!
I do index time boosting for my fields and just discovered that when
searching with a trailing wild card the boosting is ignored.
Will my boosting work with a wild card if I do it at query time? And
if so is there a lot of performance difference?
Some other method I can use to preserve
To do a proper search suggest feature you have to index all the queries
your system gets and search it with wildcards for matches on what the
user has typed so far for each user keystroke in the search box...
Usually with some timer logic to wait for a small hesitation in their
typing.
-O
>From the newSearcher(..) of a CustomEventListener which extends of
AbstractSolrEventListener can access to SolrIndexSearcher and all core
properties but can't get a SolrIndexWriter. Do you now how can I get from
there a SolrIndexWriter? This way I would be able to modify the documents (I
need to
> Hey,
> I have a field defined as such:
>
> stored="false"
> multiValued="true" />
>
> with the string type defined as:
>
> omitNorms="true"/>
>
> When I try using some query-time boost parameters using the bq on
> values of
> this field it seems to behave
> strangely in case of documents actua
On Jul 29, 2009, at 6:55 AM, Vincent Pérès wrote:
Using the following query :
http://localhost:8983/solr/others/select/?debugQuery=true&q=anna%20lewis&rows=20&start=0&fl=*&qt=dismax
I get back around 100 results. Follow the two first :
Person:151
Victoria Davisson
Person:37
Anna Lewis
And
My last mail is wrong. Sorry
El 29 de julio de 2009 11:10, Licinio Fernández
Maurelo escribió:
> I've applied latest collapse field related patch (patch-3) and it doesn't
> work.
> Anyone knows how can i get only the collapse response ?
>
>
> 29-jul-2009 11:05:21 org.apache.solr.common.SolrExcept
I am working with Solr 1.4 nightly and am running it on a Windows
machine. Solr is running using the example folder that was installed
from the zip file. The only alteration that I have made to this default
installation is to add a simple Word document into the exampledocs
folder.
I am trying to
Hi all,
Not sure how good my title is, but here is a (hopefully) better explanation
on what I mean.
I am indexing a set of articles from a DB. Each article has an author. The
author is saved in then the DB as an author ID, which is a number.
There is another table in the DB with more relevant i
Licinio Fernández Maurelo wrote:
i'm trying to do some filtering in the count list retrieved by solr when
doing a faceting query ,
i'm wondering how can i use facet.prefix to gem something like this:
Query
facet.field=foo&facet.prefix=A OR B
Response
-
12560
5440
2357
.
.
.
How
Hello,
I did notice several strange behaviors on queries. I would like to share
with you an example, so maybe you can explain to me what is going wrong.
Using the following query :
http://localhost:8983/solr/others/select/?debugQuery=true&q=anna%20lewis&rows=20&start=0&fl=*&qt=dismax
I get back
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Chantal Ackermann <
chantal.ackerm...@btelligent.de> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the environment variable (env-entry) in web.xml to configure the solr/home
> is relative to the web server's working directory. I find this unusual as
> all the servlet paths are relative to
As Solr said in the log, Solr couldn't find solrconfig.xml in classpath
or solr.solr.home, cwd.
My guess is that relative path you set for solr.solr.home
was incorrect? Why don't you try:
solr.solr.home=/home/huenzhao/search/tomcat6/bin/solr
instead of:
solr.solr.home=home/huenzhao/search/tomc
Hi,
Thanks for your response, I'm still developing so the schema is still in
flux so I guess that explains it. Oh and regarding the NPE, I updated my
checkout and recompiled and now it's gone so I guess somewhere between
revision 787997 and 798482 it's already been fixed.
Regards,
gwk
Robe
Just an FYI, Lucene 2.9 has FastVectorHighlighter:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/javadoc/all/org/apache/lucene/search/vectorhighlight/package-summary.html
Features
* fast for large docs
* support N-gram fields
* support phrase-unit highlighting with slops
*
Hi all,
the environment variable (env-entry) in web.xml to configure the
solr/home is relative to the web server's working directory. I find this
unusual as all the servlet paths are relative to the web applications
directory (webapp context, that is). So, I specified solr/home relative
to th
I've applied latest collapse field related patch (patch-3) and it doesn't work.
Anyone knows how can i get only the collapse response ?
29-jul-2009 11:05:21 org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
GRAVE: java.lang.ClassCastException:
org.apache.solr.handler.component.CollapseComponent cannot be
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Marc Sturlese wrote:
>
> That really sounds the best way to reach my goal. How could I invoque a
> listener from the newSearcher?Would be something like:
>
>
> solr 0 name="rows">10
> rocks 0 name="rows">10
> static newSearcher w
Hey,
I have a field defined as such:
with the string type defined as:
When I try using some query-time boost parameters using the bq on values of
this field it seems to behave
strangely in case of documents actually having multiple values:
If i'd do a boost for a particular value ( "site_id
Hi all:
Is in solr, that will allow documents referring each other ? In
other words, if a search for "abc" matches on document 1 , I should be able
to return document 2 even though the index does any fields matching "abc".
Here is the scenario with some more details:
Solr version:1.3
Sce
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:48 AM, Phillip Farber wrote:
>
> Normally to optimize an index you POST to /solr/update. Is
> there any way to POST an optimize message to one instance and have it
> propagate to all shards sort of like the select?
>
> /solr-shard-1/select?q=dog... shards=shard-1,shard
50 matches
Mail list logo
