This should also be true of the various ways you might force quit in
Windows, right?
2009/8/7 Yonik Seeley
> Kill -9 will not corrupt your index, but you would lose any
> uncommitted documents.
>
> -Yonik
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
I'm adding another vote for Drupal. The standard module is pretty good for
most cases and if you don't want the hassle to manage Solr you can subscribe
to Acquia which manage Solr for you.
Also, for those cases where you're not happy with the module you can easily
build your own (which is what I di
Hi all,
I am e-mailing to inquire about the status of the spellchecking component in
1.4 (distributed). I saw SOLR-785, but it is unreleased and appears to be
for 1.5. Any help would be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Mike
whoops, sorry guys
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:37 PM, mike anderson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am e-mailing to inquire about the status of the spellchecking component
> in 1.4 (distributed). I saw SOLR-785, but it is unreleased and appears to be
> for 1.5. Any help would be much appreciated.
> Thanks i
Hi all,
I am e-mailing to inquire about the status of the spellchecking component in
1.4 (distributed). I saw SOLR-785, but it is unreleased and appears to be
for 1.5. Any help would be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Mike
(sorry if this sent twice)
On Aug 7, 2009, at 5:23pm, Jay Hill wrote:
I'm using the MoreLikeThisHandler with a content stream to get
documents
from my index that match content from an html page like this:
http://localhost:8080/solr/mlt?stream.url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi
?f=/c/a/2009/08/06/SP5R194Q13.
2009/8/8 Jón Helgi Jónsson :
> Thanks for that. So perhaps use copyfield in schema and make a subcat
> field identical to my category would be the best solution?
That's certainly an undesirable side effect of our current syntax -
I'll open a JIRA issue to address this, but it's probably not
someth
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: I'm a new user of solr but I have worked a bit with Lucene before. I get
: some out of memory exception when optimizing the index through Solr and
: I would like to find out why. However, the only message I get on
: standard output is: Jul 30, 2009 9:20:22 PM
: org.apa
Thanks for that. So perhaps use copyfield in schema and make a subcat
field identical to my category would be the best solution?
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> Jón Helgi Jónsson wrote:
>>
>> I'm trying to facet multiple times on same field using key.
>>
>> This works fine
Jón Helgi Jónsson wrote:
I'm trying to facet multiple times on same field using key.
This works fine except when I use prefixes for these facets.
What I got so far (and not functional):
..
&facet=true
&facet.field=category&f.category.facet.prefix=01
&facet.field={!key=subcat}category&f.subcat.f
: I'm a new user of solr but I have worked a bit with Lucene before. I get
: some out of memory exception when optimizing the index through Solr and
: I would like to find out why. However, the only message I get on
: standard output is: Jul 30, 2009 9:20:22 PM
: org.apache.solr.common.SolrExc
11 matches
Mail list logo
