Hi,
Are you using the compound file format? If yes, then, have u set it properly
in solrconfig.xml, if not, then, change to:
true (this is by default 'false') under
the tags:
...
and, ...
Aleksander Stensby wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
> I'm getting some strange behavior here, and I'm won
just search for *:* and see if the docs are indeed there in the index.
--Noble
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 9:26 AM, krosan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to test solr for a proof of concept project, but I'm having some
> problems.
>
> I indexed my document, but when I search for a word which is 100% ce
Hi,
I'm trying to test solr for a proof of concept project, but I'm having some
problems.
I indexed my document, but when I search for a word which is 100% certain in
the document, I don't get any hits.
These are my files:
First: my data-config.xml
On Dec 20, 2009, at 7:24 PM, Peter A. Kirk wrote:
Where is the "HTTP 304" feature enabled and disabled? Or how can I
at least ensure that my logger always gets the request, however Solr
responds?
It's configured in solrconfig.xml - I generally recommend turning it
off during development,
Hi, thanks for the reply.
Yes, at the moment the queries are coming from a browser (internet explorer) -
actually I'm testing with the little webapp that comes with the Solr download.
Where is the "HTTP 304" feature enabled and disabled? Or how can I at least
ensure that my logger always gets t
Where are the queries coming from? A browser? I bet you've got the
HTTP 304 feature enabled and your client is sending etag/last-modified
headers, causing Solr to respond with a 304 response and short circuit.
Erik
On Dec 20, 2009, at 5:46 PM, Peter A. Kirk wrote:
Hi, I'd like to
Hi, I'd like to write a "Component" that can write to a simple log with query
data for every submitted query.
So far I have written a simple Component and configured it to be called in the
"standard" requestHandler. However, I have noticed that it is not always
called. It's as if some queries a
Here is an idea. Don't make one core per user. Use a field with a user id.
wunder
On Dec 20, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Matthieu Labour wrote:
> Hi
> I have a slr instance in which i created 700 core. 1 Core per user of my
> application.
> The total size of the data indexed on disk is 35GB with solr co
Hi
I have a slr instance in which i created 700 core. 1 Core per user of my
application.
The total size of the data indexed on disk is 35GB with solr cores going
from 100KB and few documents to 1.2GB and 50 000 documents.
Searching seems very slow and indexing as well
This is running on a EC2 xtra
We were talking about GC options a lot; don't forget to enclose following
into "if (log.isInfoEnabled())":
...
final NamedList responseHeader = new SimpleOrderedMap();
rsp.add("responseHeader", responseHeader);
NamedList toLog = rsp.getToLog();
//toLog.add("core", getName());
t
After researching how to configure default SOLR & Tomcat logging, I finally
disabled INFO-level for SOLR.
And performance improved at least 7 times!!! ('at least 7' because I
restarted server 5 minutes ago; caches are not prepopulated yet)
Before that, I had 300-600 ms in HTTPD log files in avera
Hi Varun,
Yes, after going over the code I think you are right. If you change
the following if block in SolrIndexSearcher.getDocSet(Query query,
DocSet filter, DocSetAwareCollector collector):
if (first==null) {
first = getDocSetNC(absQ, null);
filterCache.put(absQ,first);
}
with:
Hi Grant,
My queries are about 5 times slower when using payloads as compared to
queries that dont use payloads on the same index. I have not done any
profiling yet, I am trying out lucid gaze now.
I do all the load testing after warming up.
Since my index is small ~1 GB, was wondering if a ramDire
13 matches
Mail list logo
