you are right about wildcards and analysis stuff...
so any way of putting wildcards in for analysis?
-
Zeki ama calismiyor... Calissa yapar...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/synonyms-txt-different-results-on-admin-and-on-site-tp3318338p3322026.html
Sent
Well, I'd like to do the following:
I've got a website full of blogposts and every blogpost has an owner, this
owner is refererred to through his/her id. For example: BloggerId = 123.
It's also possible that the blog has multiple co-writers, which are also
referred to by there BloggerId but these
Hi again,
After reading a bit more, IBM no longer supports the JDBC driver for Lotus
Notes. Instead the Notes.jar API is recommended. So I'll go with that, as
Oleg suggested.
2011/9/6 Tobias Berg
> Thanks Jan,
>
> I will look into using the JDBC driver.
>
> /Tobias
>
>
> 2011/9/5 Jan Høydahl
>
There are 2 use cases:
1. rows=10 means 10 groups.
2. rows=10 means to results (irregardless of groups).
I thought there was a total number of groups (ngroups) or case #1.
I don't believe case #2 has been coded.
On 9/8/11 2:22 PM, "alx...@aim.com" wrote:
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>When trying to impl
Do you need to use the compound format?
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Rich Cariens wrote:
> I should add some more context:
>
> 1. the problem index included several cfs segment files that were around
> 4.7G, and
> 2. I'm running four SOLR instances on the same box, all of which have
>
: Is there an easy way without out writing custom response writers to accept a
: parameter on the request URL and then substitute that value in the response?
there's nothing built in to support this using the syntax you are asking
about, but one approach to consider instead of writing a custom r
Is there an easy way without out writing custom response writers to accept a
parameter on the request URL and then substitute that value in the response?
For example, if an index field is setup and a value like the following is
added to a field:
http://www.google.com/?partner={$partner}
If
(11/09/09 6:16), Rahul Warawdekar wrote:
Hi,
I am currently evaluating the FastVectorHighlighter in a Solr search based
project and have a couple of questions
1. Is there any specific reason why the FastVectorHighlighter does not
provide support for multiterm(wildcard) queries ?
2. What are the
I should add some more context:
1. the problem index included several cfs segment files that were around
4.7G, and
2. I'm running four SOLR instances on the same box, all of which have
similiar problem indeces.
A colleague thought perhaps I was bumping up against my 256,000 open files
: I would think I could index a lat,lon pair into a GeoHashField (that
: works) and then retrieve the field value to see the computed geohash.
...
: What am I missing - how can I retrieve the hash?
I don't think it's designed to work that way.
GeoHashField provides GeoHash based search
I'm wondering if anyone has attempted this. The general idea is to have a
FunctionQueryNode, Builder and Pipeline, where functions appear as
foo(param) within the query string. Further down the pipeline, Solr has
provided functionality for handling ValueSources. The only issue I have
encountered
: When shooting a distributed query, we use facet.limit=1000. Then the merging
: SOLR combines the results. We also use facet.zeros=false to ensure returning
: only non-zero facet entries.
: The issue that we found is that there was a gap in time in the final results
: list (reverse sorted by date
FWiW I optimized the index down to a single segment and now I have no
trouble opening an MMapDirectory on that index, even though the 23G cfx
segment file remains.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Rich Cariens wrote:
> Thanks for the response. "free -g" reports:
>
> totalused
Hi,
I am currently evaluating the FastVectorHighlighter in a Solr search based
project and have a couple of questions
1. Is there any specific reason why the FastVectorHighlighter does not
provide support for multiterm(wildcard) queries ?
2. What are the other constraints when using FastVectorHig
: q=49 OR *
I don't think that query means what you think it means...
: > Is there a way to tell Solr to only use fq and neglect q if no answer? Or
: > am I doomed to send first request, realize I've got no answer and then send
: > a second request?
what do you mean by "no answer" ?
I *think*
In our case it's clearly the wrong tradeoff :)
I'm going to patch our Solr for now, but either
- a config option
- a facet.whatever param
- or reversing the tradeoff
should be done in my eyes.
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011 um 22:34 schrieb Yonik Seeley:
> So this is bad if you have a hi
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Frederik Kraus wrote:
> Now that is quite interesting indeed and sounds like a bug to me. Including
> facets with a count of 0 we have a few 100k which then apparently get
> transferred. hmhmhm
>
> Can anyone with more knowledge of the facet component maybe chime
Thanks for the response. "free -g" reports:
totalusedfreesharedbuffers
cached
Mem: 141 95 46 0
093
-/+ buffers/cache: 2 139
Swap: 3 0 3
2011/9/7 François Schiettecatte
>
Hello,
When trying to implement pagination as in the case without grouping I see two
issues.
1. with rows=10 solr feed displays 10 groups not 10 results
2. there is no total number of results with grouping to show the last page.
In detail:
1. I need to display only 10 results in one page.
Now that is quite interesting indeed and sounds like a bug to me. Including
facets with a count of 0 we have a few 100k which then apparently get
transferred. hmhmhm
Can anyone with more knowledge of the facet component maybe chime in why the
miscount is removed?
Am Donnerstag, 8. September
> yep - facet.mincount=1
Yeah, I've ran into this same issue, though I never looked too closely into it.
What is happening is that the facet.mincount parameter is removed when the
query is made to the shards, so each shard is returning about 3 facet
values, most of them with a count of 0. I
yep - facet.mincount=1
Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2011 um 21:37 schrieb Michael Ryan:
> Are you using facet.mincount in the query?
>
> -Michael
Are you using facet.mincount in the query?
-Michael
Function queries don't work with multivalued field.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#Vector_Functions
You'll have to think in another way of doing that. What do you want to
achieve with that map?
Regards
Emmanuel
2011/9/8 tkamphuis
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on implementing Solr in a proje
Hi guys,
I've just experienced an odd issue today with the following setup:
Test 1:
20 Shards
facet.limit=2 (returned facets 2-3)
about 5-6MB network traffic
Resp Time ca 3sec
Test 2:
20 Shards
facet.limit=100 (returned facets 2-3)
only a few kb network traffic
Resp Time ca 0.02sec
Does
Hi,
it is possible to create a new similarity class which returns the term
occurrences.
You have to disable Idf (just return1), normalization and co.
then you have to declare it in your schema:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Similarity
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins#Similarity
Hi,
I am working on a plugin for Solr, and in this project, a
QueryNodeException [1] is thrown in the case of an error while parsing
the query.
However, I receive the following exception in such a case:
HTTP Status 500 - Can't find bundle for base name
org.apache.lucene.queryParser.core
Lucene isn't even close to a DBMS. The batch commits make it less of of
database than Berkeley DB.
Lucene is a search engine.
wunder
On Sep 8, 2011, at 8:54 AM, Jaeger, Jay - DOT wrote:
> If you think about it, Lucene (upon which Solr is build) *is* a kind of DBMS
> - just not an RDBMS. Afte
Hi ,
I am using separate task to monitor solr instances, where do i find xsd
schemas for MultiCore Solr responses inorder to correctly parse them.
thanks,
Ani
eg. XML
"
016
core0multicore\core0\multicore\core0\data\2011-09-07T21:36:53.864Z
67193861001313764498766
falsetruefalse
If you think about it, Lucene (upon which Solr is build) *is* a kind of DBMS -
just not an RDBMS. After all, in the end, a DBMS stores its stuff in files,
too. If you then turned around and mapped the stuff that Solr does into
database tables, you would lose all of the performance advantages t
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:57 PM, kiran.bodigam wrote:
> SOLR will keep the indexed information in directory called
> index(${DATA_DIR}/index) after clicking the commit from admin console and
> also we can override the existing index files. similarly can we keep (or)
> store these index related in
Hi,
I'm working on implementing Solr in a project and right now I'm stuck on a
specific search including an arr field. The thing is:
I'd like to search sub-id's on an object, these sub-id's are stored in a
multivalue field, e.g.:
12272
12304
12306
The query (or part of the query) that
> " Following up from your message on the Nutch list. If q=*:* is showing you
> empty elements,
no fields are getting indexed."
I don't think that is correct. I believe that the correct statement would be
no fields are getting *** stored ***. If the fields were not getting indexed,
they woul
You can try this: q=key:value1^8 key=value2^4 key=value3^2.
It should be working.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-write-this-query-tp3318577p3319491.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I have a problem with solr search. If I search after "vitamin" I receive :
1 - arrca MULTIVITAMIN FRUCHTSAFTBÄRCHEN
2 - VITAMIN E-KAPSELN NAT. 400
How can I configure the fieldtype or the query to get the documents by
position of the word in documents found?("VITAMIN E-KAPSELN NAT. 400" befo
Wildcard terms are not analyzed, so your synonyms.txt may come into play here,
have you check the analysis for deniz* ?
François
On Sep 7, 2011, at 10:08 PM, deniz wrote:
> well yea you are right... i realised that lack of detail issue here... so
> here it comes...
>
>
> This is from my sche
ok, I guess I found how
q=49 OR *
2011/9/8 elisabeth benoit
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a query
>
> /select?&q=49&q.alt=*:*&fq=NAME_ANALYZED:decorasol AND WAY_ANALYZED:rue
> charonne AND (TOWN_ANALYZED:paris OR
> DEPARTMENT_ANALYZED:paris)&rows=50&fl=*,score&
>
> returning no answer because of the q=
First, this is a very sparse problem statement, please review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
But my guess is that you perhaps changed your schema
and didn't re-index completely. Use admin/schema browser
to look at the field and see whether the values in the
field are what you expe
Glad you resolved it. I've spent more time than I'd like to admit
trying to get an IDE to play nice!
Erick
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Sowmya V.B. wrote:
> Hi Erick
>
> It was indeed an eclipse issue! Thanks for saying that.
> I cleaned the project, restarted eclipse and built again...and I
Hello,
I have a query
/select?&q=49&q.alt=*:*&fq=NAME_ANALYZED:decorasol AND WAY_ANALYZED:rue
charonne AND (TOWN_ANALYZED:paris OR
DEPARTMENT_ANALYZED:paris)&rows=50&fl=*,score&
returning no answer because of the q=49 parameter.
The query
/select?&q=&q.alt=*:*&fq=NAME_ANALYZED:decorasol AND WA
In the RequestHandler spellCheckCompRH you have to make changes as follows:
explicit
textSpell
false
true
5
spellcheck
This hopefully should do it.
Also I would suggest that for the time being (i.e. till you ge
How about using jmap or jvisualvm?
Or even connecting with eclipse to the process for live analysis?
Am 08.09.2011 11:07, schrieb Rohit:
Nope not getting anything here also.
Regards,
Rohit
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Li [mailto:zongjie...@gmail.com]
Sent: 08 September 2011 08:09
No, as far as I know sorting by group count isn't planned. You can create an
issue in Jira where future development of this feature can be tracked.
On 7 September 2011 23:54, bobsolr wrote:
> Hi Martijn,
>
> Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately I can't reference the group size using
> a
> functio
Nope not getting anything here also.
Regards,
Rohit
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Li [mailto:zongjie...@gmail.com]
Sent: 08 September 2011 08:09
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Unable to generate trace
what about kill -3 PID command?
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Rohit
what about kill -3 PID command?
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Rohit wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am running solr in tomcat on a linux machine, my solr hangs after about 40
> hrs, I wanted to generate the dump and analyse the logs. But the command
> kill -QUIT PID doesn't seem to be doing anything.
>
Hi,
I am running solr in tomcat on a linux machine, my solr hangs after about 40
hrs, I wanted to generate the dump and analyse the logs. But the command
kill -QUIT PID doesn't seem to be doing anything.
How can I generate a dump otherwise to see, why solr hangs?
Regards,
Rohit
I already tried with field type = "textSpell" but it didn't work, I replaced it
though.
I found this code :
default
false
false
1
spellcheck
I put this in solrconfig.xml and used the query you gave me, there is the build line (like before) but I don't have any
I already tried with field type = "textSpell" but it didn't work, I replaced it
though.
I found this code :
default
false
false
1
spellcheck
I put this in solrconfig.xml and used the query you gave me, there is the build line (like before) but I don't have any
If you have meta-data available on what all is actually searched on your
site, you can use mahout to get keywords, and then define your solr
accordingly.
THis might help:
https://cwiki.apache.org/MAHOUT/collocations.html
Alternatively, you can parse your query (either at client end or server end
49 matches
Mail list logo
