On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 01:53:44PM -0500, François Schiettecatte wrote:
> It won't and depending on how your analyzer is set up the terms are most
> likely stemmed at index time.
>
> You could create a separate field for unstemmed terms though, or use a less
> aggressive stemmer such as EnglishM
Hi
Could there be any possibility of index being in unstable state when I
restarted the server?
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Samarendra Pratap wrote:
> Hi,
> I restarted solr server with minor configuration changes and I/O and load
> on server increased a lot.
>
> Details:-
> Solr version:
Stemming is imprefect since it's algorithmic. If you look at the
admin/analysis page
you can see the effects of the various steps (check the verbose box)...
rainy stems to raini so it's not a match for rain.
There will always be anomalies like this, you either have to handle them with
exceptions
: : On both - solr 1.4 and 3.5 configuration of JVM is the same, and the
: : same servlet container ... jetty-6
I forgot to ask: when you say it's jetty-6 in both cases, are you running
the exact same set of jetty configs for both Solr 1.4 and Solr 3.5, or is
each instance using the sample jett
: > previous Solr 1.4 index? what does a directory listing (including file
: > sizes) look like for both your old and new indexes?
:
: Yes, both indexes have same data. Indexes are build using some C++
: programm which reads data from database and inserts it into Solr
: (using XML). Both indexes
Hi,
Perhaps you could try to remove the luceneMatchVersion from the 3.5 solrconfig
again and use same schema version as for 1.4; to more closely emulate behavior
of 1.4. LuceneMatchVersion will modify several defaults. Quick way to see if
any of these new defaults make a change.
--
Jan Høydahl
IO waits about 0-2%
Didn't see any suspicious activity in logs, but I can check it again
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Darren Govoni wrote:
> Any suspicous activity in the logs? what about disk activity?
>
>
> On 11/29/2011 05:22 PM, Pawel Rog wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Chr
Any suspicous activity in the logs? what about disk activity?
On 11/29/2011 05:22 PM, Pawel Rog wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
Let's back up a minute and cover some basics...
1) You said that you built a brand new index on a brand new master server,
using Solr
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> Let's back up a minute and cover some basics...
>
> 1) You said that you built a brand new index on a brand new master server,
> using Solr 3.5 -- how do you build your indexes? did the source data
> change at all? does your new index ha
This does appear to work well. It seems there are not many people interested
in this particular problem now, but I figured I'd just complete the story in
case it helps somebody in the future.
With the neighbor node ID prefixes, I'm getting the facet values and counts as
I require. Since I ha
Yes, it looks like I'll have to do some pre-processing outside of Solr.
I don't mind giving users the option to query a differently indexed
field, ie, same content, but not stemmed, although this would apply to
all keywords they enter, so they couldn't allow stemming on one keyword,
but not anothe
: To answer myself (sorry for the noise) - removed accidentally the admin
handler section (only
: ping was there) and thats causing the issue, after fixing this error,
: all is fine again.
Right, this handler...
...automaticly registers most of the /admin/* handlers
Let's back up a minute and cover some basics...
1) You said that you built a brand new index on a brand new master server,
using Solr 3.5 -- how do you build your indexes? did the source data
change at all? does your new index have the same number of docs as your
previous Solr 1.4 index? wha
in my last pos i mean
default operation AND
promoted - int
ending - int
b_count - int
name - text
cat1 - int
cat2 - int
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Pawel Rog wrote:
> examples
>
> facet=true&sort=promoted+desc,ending+asc,b_count+desc&facet.mincount=1&start=0&q=name:(kurtka+skóry+brazowe42)&f
You might try the snowball stemmer too, I am not sure how closely that will fit
your requirements though.
Alternatively you could use synonyms.
François
On Nov 29, 2011, at 1:08 AM, mina wrote:
> thank you for your answer.i read it and i use this filter in my schema.xml in
> solr:
>
>
>
> b
examples
facet=true&sort=promoted+desc,ending+asc,b_count+desc&facet.mincount=1&start=0&q=name:(kurtka+skóry+brazowe42)&facet.limit=500&facet.field=cat1&facet.field=cat2&wt=json&rows=50
facet=true&sort=promoted+desc,ending+asc,b_count+desc&facet.mincount=1&start=1350&q=name:naczepa&facet.limit=50
It won't and depending on how your analyzer is set up the terms are most likely
stemmed at index time.
You could create a separate field for unstemmed terms though, or use a less
aggressive stemmer such as EnglishMinimalStemFilterFactory.
François
On Nov 29, 2011, at 12:33 PM, Robert Brown wro
Does solr include the functionality to split words but give the same
offsets to both words.
So for instance if I have a word like "pop-dop", and I split on "-", I get
two words "pop" and "dop" but both have offsets start and end 0,3 instead
of 0,2 followed by (4,6)
Thanks !
Geetu
: Another newbie question here
: Browse handler works perfect. Now I want to configure my "/select" handler
: so that I perform ajax-solr on it.
: How to perform it. The website
: https://github.com/evolvingweb/ajax-solr
: https://github.com/evolvingweb/ajax-solr
: explains how t
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Pawel wrote:
> I've build index on solr 1.4 some time ago (about 18milions documents,
> about 8GB). I need new features from newer version of solr, so i
> decided to upgrade solr version from 1.4 to 3.5.
>
> * I created new solr master on new physical machine
> *
Is it possible to search a field but not be affected by the snowball
filter?
ie, searching for "manage" is matching "management", but a user may
want to restrict results to only containing "manage".
I was hoping that simply quoting the term would do this, but it
doesn't appear to make any di
I've build index on solr 1.4 some time ago (about 18milions documents,
about 8GB). I need new features from newer version of solr, so i
decided to upgrade solr version from 1.4 to 3.5.
* I created new solr master on new physical machine
* then I created new index using the same schema as in earlie
Hmm...I've seen a bug like this, but I don't think it would be tickled if
you are replicating config files...
It def looks related though ... I'll try to dig around.
Next time it happens, take a look on the slave for 0 size files - also if
the index dir on the slave is plain 'index' or has a time
Hi, for the moment there are no 0 sized files, but all indexes are working
now. I will have to look next time it breaks.
Yes, the directory name is "index" and it replicates the schema and a
synonyms file.
/Ruben Chadien
On 29 November 2011 15:29, Mark Miller wrote:
> Also, on your master, what
Hi,
the quick and dirty way sound good:)
It would be great if you can send me a patch for 1.4.1.
By the way, i tested Solr. 3.5 with my 1.4.1 test index.
I can search and optimize, but clustering doesn't work (java.lang.Integer
cannot be cast to java.lang.String)
My uniqieKey for my docs it the "
Am 29.11.2011 15:20, schrieb Erick Erickson:
Hmmm, I tried this in straight Java, no Solr/Lucene involved and the
behavior I'm seeing is that no example works if it has more than
one whitespace character after the hyphen, including your failure
example.
I haven't lived inside regexes for long en
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:21 AM, elisabeth benoit
wrote:
> ok, thanks.
>
> I think it would be a nice improvment to consider inversion as distance =
> 1, since it's a so common mistake. The distance = 2 makes it difficult to
> correct transpositions on small words (for instance, the DirectSpellChe
Note that the original question was when working from a custom update request
handler, you're not doing that at all...
It's not clear to me whether doing queries ahead of time like you're doing is
more or less speedy than a custom update request handler given that in
the one case you're querying a
Also, on your master, what is the name of the index directory? Just 'index'?
And are you replicating config files as well or no?
On Nov 29, 2011, at 9:23 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Does the problem index have any 0 size files in it?
>
> On Nov 29, 2011, at 2:54 AM, Ruben Chadien wrote:
>
>> HI
Does the problem index have any 0 size files in it?
On Nov 29, 2011, at 2:54 AM, Ruben Chadien wrote:
> HI all
>
> After upgrading tol Solr 3.4 we are having trouble with the replication.
> The setup is one indexing master with a few slaves that replicate the
> indexes once every night.
> The la
ok, thanks.
I think it would be a nice improvment to consider inversion as distance =
1, since it's a so common mistake. The distance = 2 makes it difficult to
correct transpositions on small words (for instance, the DirectSpellChecker
couldn't make the right suggestion for "joile" given for 'joli
Hmmm, I tried this in straight Java, no Solr/Lucene involved and the
behavior I'm seeing is that no example works if it has more than
one whitespace character after the hyphen, including your failure
example.
I haven't lived inside regexes for long enough that I don't know what
the right regex sho
>
> But my actual live system works on solr 1.4.1. i can only change my
> solrconfig.xml and integrate new packages...
> i check the possibility to upgrade from 1.4.1 to 3.5 with the same index
> (without reinidex) with luceneMatchVersion 2.9.
> i hope it works...
>
Another option would be to chec
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 8:07 AM, elisabeth benoit
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to know if the Levensthein distance algorithm used by Solr 4.0
> DirectSpellChecker (working quite well I must say) is considering an
> inversion as distance = 1 or distance = 2?
>
> For instance, if I write Monteruil a
Hello Staszek,
thanks for testing:)
i think the same (serialization issue ->int to string).
This config works fine with solr 4.0 in my test cluster, i think with 3,5
too, without problems.
But my actual live system works on solr 1.4.1. i can only change my
solrconfig.xml and integrate new packages
hi all,
I want to use wild query and fuzzy search together in my query. i installed
ComplexPhraseQueryParser for that, but when running url with
"defType=complexphrase" , i ger below error.
HTTP Status 500 - luceneMatchVersion java.lang.NoSuchFieldError:
luceneMatchVersion at
org.apache.solr.sear
Hello,
I'd like to know if the Levensthein distance algorithm used by Solr 4.0
DirectSpellChecker (working quite well I must say) is considering an
inversion as distance = 1 or distance = 2?
For instance, if I write Monteruil and I meant Montreuil, is the distance 1
or 2?
Thanks,
Elisabeth
To answer myself (sorry for the noise) - removed accidentally the admin handler
section (only
ping was there) and thats causing the issue, after fixing this error,
all is fine again.
Torsten
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Hi,
It looks like some serialization issue related to writing integer ids to
the output. I've just tried a similar configuration on Solr 3.5 and the
integer identifiers looked fine. Can you try the same configuration on Solr
3.5?
Thanks,
Staszek
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:03, Vadim Kisselmann
Hi Torsten,
some more information would help us to help you:
- does calling /apps/solrslave/admin/ return the Admin Homepage?
- what is the path to your SOLR_HOME
- where in the filesystem are solrconfig.xml and schema.xml (even if
this sounds redundant, maybe they are just misplaced)
- their read
Hi,
I restarted solr server with minor configuration changes and I/O and load
on server increased a lot.
Details:-
Solr version: 3.4
Jetty version: 6.1
Index Size: 30 GB
Total document: 14.6 mn
Request / second :20 (in day time)
Last restart: 15 days ago
Open threads: 50 - 60 (at any moment)
A f
Hi folks,
i've installed the clustering component in solr 1.4.1 and it works, but not
really:)
You can see what the doc id is corrupt.
Euro-Krise
½Íџ
¾ͽ
¿)ై
my fields:
and my config-snippets:
title
id
text
i changed my config snippets (carrot.url=id, url, title..) but the
Anyone an idea?
regards
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Hi,
got some interesting problem and don't know how to debug further.
I am using an external solr home configured via jndi.
Deployed my war file (context is /apps/solrslave/) and if want to look
at the schema:
/apps/solrslave/admin/file/?contentType=text/xml;charset=utf-8&file=schema.xml
the res
44 matches
Mail list logo
