Let's say a user types in:
DualHead2Go
The way solr is working, it splits this into:
Dual Head 2 Go
And searches the index for various fields, and finds records where any ONE of
them matches.
Now, if I simply type the search terms Dual Head 2 Go, it finds records where
ALL of them match.
Hi,
wildcard and fuzzy queries are not analyzed.
-Sascha
Alok Bhandari alokomprakashbhand...@gmail.com schrieb:
Hello ,
I am pushing Chuck Follett'.?.? in solr and when I query for this field
with query string field:Follett'.* I am getting 0 results.
field type declared is
fieldType
Thanks for reply.
If I check the debug query through solr-admin I can see that the lower case
filter is applied and
rawquerystring:em_to_name:Follett'.*,
querystring:em_to_name:Follett'.*,
parsedquery:+em_to_name:follett'.*,
parsedquery_toString:+em_to_name:follett'.*,
Hi,
I suppose you are using Solr 3.6. Then take a look at
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2011/11/29/whats-with-lowercasing-wildcard-multiterm-queries-in-solr/
-Sascha
Alok Bhandari alokomprakashbhand...@gmail.com schrieb:
Thanks for reply.
If I check the debug query through
Argh! (and hooray!)
I started from scratch again, following the wiki instructions. I did only
one thing differently; put my data directory in /opt instead of /home/dev.
And now it works!
I'm glad it's working now. I just wish I knew exactly what the difference
is. The directory in /opt has
Yes I am using Solr 3.6.
Thanks for the link it is very useful.
From the link I could make out that if analyzer includes any one of the
following then they are applied and any other elements specified under
analyzer are not applied as they are not multi-term aware.
ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory
Hi,
does anybody knows if there is a rule around the ordering of what's returned
by a facet if the counts are all the same?
Is that ordered by time of indexation of the doc in Solr?
cheers
Maurizio
--
View this message in context:
Dear All,
In my XML files to index I have several abstract fields with different
languages.
I.e: ABEN, ABIT, ABFR, ABPT, etc
I would like to:
Index Store only the ABEN
and
Only Store all other AB* fields
Is it possible to write in the schema.xml
field name=ABEN type=text_en
That could work, but then how do you ensure commit is called on the two
cores at the exact same time?
Also, any way to commit a specific update rather then all the back-logged
ones?
Cheers,
Nicholas
On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 16:19:31 -0700, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com
wrote:
Index all documents
So, my question is how do we get Solr search to work with
AND when it is splitting words? The splitting part is good,
the bad part is that it is searching for any one of those
split words.
Setting autoGeneratePhraseQueries=true and mm=100% might help you.
fieldType name=text
--- On Mon, 7/2/12, Bruno Mannina bmann...@free.fr wrote:
From: Bruno Mannina bmann...@free.fr
Subject: Dynamic Field Name?
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Monday, July 2, 2012, 1:02 PM
Dear All,
In my XML files to index I have several abstract fields with
different languages.
Le 02/07/2012 13:32, Ahmet Arslan a écrit :
--- On Mon, 7/2/12, Bruno Mannina bmann...@free.fr wrote:
From: Bruno Mannina bmann...@free.fr
Subject: Dynamic Field Name?
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Monday, July 2, 2012, 1:02 PM
Dear All,
In my XML files to index I have several
I am indexing the file using php curl library. I am stuck here with the code
echo Stored in: . upload/ . $_FILES[file][name];
$result=move_uploaded_file($_FILES[file][tmp_name],upload/ .
$_FILES[file][name]);
if ($result == 1) echo pUpload done ./p;
$options = getopt(f:);
in your schema.xml you can set the default query parser operator, in
your case solrQueryParser defaultOperator=AND/, but it's
deprecated.
When you use the edismax, read this:http://drupal.org/node/1559394 .
mm-param is here the answer.
Best regards
Vadim
2012/7/2 Steve Fatula
http://172.17.100.16:/solr/collection1/select?q=name:(4U OR Cabs)^12.8
category:(4U OR Cabs)^1.6 subcategory:(4U OR Cabs)^0.4 description:(4U OR
Cabs)^0.1
the above query is throwing the the following error
field subcategory was indexed with Field.omitTermFreqAndPositions=true;
cannot run
http://172.17.100.16:/solr/collection1/select?q=name:(4U
OR Cabs)^12.8
category:(4U OR Cabs)^1.6 subcategory:(4U OR Cabs)^0.4
description:(4U OR
Cabs)^0.1
the above query is throwing the the following error
field subcategory was indexed with
Field.omitTermFreqAndPositions=true;
From: Vadim Kisselmann v.kisselm...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Steve Fatula compconsult...@yahoo.com
Sent: Monday, July 2, 2012 4:31 AM
Subject: Re: Dismax Question
in your schema.xml you can set the default query parser operator, in
your case solrQueryParser
From: Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Steve Fatula compconsult...@yahoo.com
Sent: Monday, July 2, 2012 6:22 AM
Subject: Re: Dismax Question
So, my question is how do we get Solr search to work with
AND when it is splitting words? The splitting part is good,
Hi,
perhaps it's better to use a PHP Solr client library. I used
https://code.google.com/p/solr-php-client/
in a project of mine and it worked just fine.
-Sascha
Asif wrote:
I am indexing the file using php curl library. I am stuck here with the code
echo Stored in: . upload/ .
Dear Solr Users,
I'm an enthusiastic solr user since version 1.4. I'm now working on a new
solr based application heavily using fuzzy searches for string matching.
Unfortunately I'm facing a strange problem using fuzzy search and I hope
someone can help me to get more information.
I indexed
Hi Peyman,
It is, at least from your perspective and probably system design. In our
case for example, we have slightly different approach, where a user query
is formed on a client side and then caught and pre-processed on a backend
side before being sent over to solr. That backend side would be
Try to add below below file, and set to any path you would like to use:
/usr/local/tomcat/conf/Catalina/localhost/solr.xml
Context path=/solr
Environment name=solr/home type=java.lang.String
value=/usr/local/tomcat/data/solr/dev/ override=true/
/Context
Roxy
-Original Message-
I will be out of the office starting 02/07/2012 and will not return until
16/07/2012.
Please email to itsta...@actionimages.com for any urgent issues.
Action Images is a division of Reuters Limited and your data will therefore be
protected
in accordance with the Reuters Group Privacy / Data
I and another user recently posted about this exact same issue. It sounds
like maybe this is a new bug introduced in 3.6:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201206.mbox/%3CCAMKKMTx_ybPqsbgU5NtQ19t%2B0kWdAHtq-CZTZxfYxdu6rS1u1g%40mail.gmail.com%3E
I'm trying to figure out why adding an OR condition to a query filter would
end up restricting results, instead of unioning them? I would expect to get
back more results by adding a union to the filter query.
Case 1 – 380 Results
380 results are returned with a query of xyz with a query
Hi Chamnap,
The first thing that jumped out at me was facet.mincount=1. Are you
sure you need this? Increasing this number should drastically improve
speed.
Michael Della Bitta
Appinions, Inc. -- Where Influence Isn’t a Game.
Hi Michael,
Thanks for quick response. Based on documentation, facet.mincount means
that solr will return facet fields that has at least that number. For me, I
just want to ensure my facet fields count doesn't have zero value.
I try to increase to 10, but it still slows even for the same query.
Opened a JIRA issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3589, which
also lists a couple other related mailing list posts.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Tom Burton-West tburt...@umich.eduwrote:
Hello,
My previous e-mail with a CJK example has received no replies. I
verified
From: Joel Rosen joel.ro...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Steve Fatula compconsult...@yahoo.com
Cc: Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com; Tom Burton-West tburt...@umich.edu
Sent: Monday, July 2, 2012 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: Dismax Question
I and another user recently posted about this
From: Joel Rosen joel.ro...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Steve Fatula compconsult...@yahoo.com
Cc: Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com; Tom Burton-West tburt...@umich.edu
Sent: Monday, July 2, 2012 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: Dismax Question
I and another user recently posted about this
Dear All,
I have several input file to index within more than 17 000 docs.
Sometimes indexation bugs because there is a mistake in XML structure
(like a ]] inside CDATA field)
Is exist a test.jar somewhere before running the post.jar?
Thanks alot,
Bruno
Interestingly, I just logged the issue of it not showing the right error in the
UI here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3591
As for your specific issue, not sure, but the error should at least also show
in the admin view.
Erik
On Jul 2, 2012, at 18:59 , Briggs Thompson
I am not able to ADD individual documents via the DIH, but updating works as
expected. The stored procedure that is called within the DIH returns the
expected data for the new document, Solr appears to do its thing, but it
never makes it to the Solr server, as evidence that subsequent queries
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/discussion.html#mail-archives
-Hoss
: If you implement SolrCoreAware interface in your custom
: UpdateRequestProcessorFactory, you could then access your cache via Solr
: Core in the inform method, I think. Haven't tried it myself, but it looks
: logical to me to start from there.
right ... but you really only need to be
I should add that I am using the full-import command in all cases, and setting
clean=false for the individual adds.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Klostermeyer, Michael [mailto:mklosterme...@riskexchange.com]
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 5:41 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject:
I have a classic spatial search schema in solr with a lat_long field. Is
there way to do a bounding-box type search that will pull back results that
are uniformly distributed so their isn't the case of 10 pins being on top of
each other? Ie, if I have a 100-mile box, not result will return within
The URL I am using is
http://localhost/solr/dataimport?commit=truewt=jsonclean=falseuniqueID=2028046command=full%2Dimportentity=myEntityName
uniqueID is the ID of the newly created DB record. This ID gets passed to the
stored procedure and returns the expected data when I run the SP directly.
Wildcards are slow. Leading wildcards are even more slow. Is there
some way to search that data differently? If it is a string, can you
change it to a text field and make sure 'apartment' is a separate
word?
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Chamnap Chhorn chamnapchh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Purely negative queries are problematic. You need to add a *:*:
(*:* NOT sentence_id:[* TO *])
Meaning all documents except those with values in the sentence_id field.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Breese,John
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 11:19 AM
To:
Hi Lance,
I didn't use wildcards at all. This is a normal text search only. I need a
string field because it needs to be matched exactly, and the value is
sometimes a multi-word, so quoted it is necessary.
By the way, if I do a super plain query, it takes at least 600ms. I'm not
sure why. On
On 3 July 2012 07:54, Klostermeyer, Michael
mklosterme...@riskexchange.com wrote:
I should add that I am using the full-import command in all cases, and
setting clean=false for the individual adds.
What does the data-import page report at the end of the
full-import, i.e., how many documents
q2=*apartment*
q1=*apartment*
These are wildcards
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Chamnap Chhorn chamnapchh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Lance,
I didn't use wildcards at all. This is a normal text search only. I need a
string field because it needs to be matched exactly, and the value is
43 matches
Mail list logo
