Hi,
For an E-commerce website, we have stored the products as SOLR
documents with the following fields and weights:
Title:5
Description:4
For some products, we need to ensure that they appear in the top ten
results even if their relevance in the above two fields does not
qualify them for being in
Thanks David,
this is very good news. :)
Regards,
Ere
1.10.2012 21.46, Smiley, David W. kirjoitti:
Looks like this important bug fix is making it into 4.0 !
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-release-4-0-take-two-tp4010808p4011255.html
On Oct 1, 2012, at 10:26 AM, David Smiley (@MITRE.o
: Doc A has keywords "Car Dealer", "Car Repair"
: Doc B has keywords "Car Washing", "Car Clean"
:
: I have a "Optional Keywords" list that contains keywords like "Dealer".
:
: If my query is "Car Repair" should only match Doc A.
: If my query is "Car", should match "Car Dealer", because "Dealer"
Hi,
If you like, you can open a JIRA issue on this and provide as much info as
possible. Someone can then look into (potential) memory optimization of this
part of the code.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
28. sep.
Hi,
Instead of searching for "Car Dealer" search for +"Car Dealer". This
will match only Doc A.
Otis
--
Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Nicholas Ding wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi Rajan,
Unless you are super keen on implementing this yourself, let me point
you to http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html which does what
you described and a lot more. Alternatively, you could also try
Google Analytics, which has some support for search, but not a lot.
Otis
--
Perfo
On Oct 3, 2012, at 3:16 PM, Michael Della Bitta
wrote:
> Leading off with a negation does weird things. Try
>
> (*:* AND NOT categoryid:387602) OR mfrid:18678
>
> Michael Della Bitta
>
Yep, works fine in this manner. So, the problem indeed is the leading negate,
even with parentheses, it ig
Your query is really the same as
mfrid:18678 -categoryid:3876021
Which means select all documents with that mfrid value and then exclude from
that set all documents that have the specified categoryid.
Maybe what you wanted is
mfrid:18678 OR (*:* -categoryid:3876021)
or
q=(*:* !categoryid:3
Leading off with a negation does weird things. Try
(*:* AND NOT categoryid:387602) OR mfrid:18678
Michael Della Bitta
Appinions
18 East 41st Street, 2nd Floor
New York, NY 10017-6271
www.appinions.com
Where Influence Isn’t a Game
On Wed, Oct 3
If I search for
q=!categoryid:3876021, solr correctly tells me there are two million plus hits.
If I search for
q=mfrid:18678, solr tell me there are 50,314 hits
I want to combine those two results, so I try
q=!categoryid:3876021 OR mfrid:18678
I would have expected two million plus results,
Add a filter query parameter, such as &fq=content_type:video .
Or if you want the user to be able to add that in the search box, use
edismax and the query string could be:
"obama budget" AND content_type:video
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: srinalluri
Sent: Wednesday
: if the query word is "ABCD",then after being tokenized it is "A" "BC" "D" ,
: l want to boost term "BC" ,so the query word is like this: "A BC^10 D" and
: phrase query "ABCD" . all query words users typing in will be processed
: like that automaticly.
it's not really clear from your example how
Does anyone have any ideas on the issue noted below?
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Steve wrote:
> Hello, I have a simple Solr core setup to index 500 store locations with
> their corresponding latitude / longitude. The core is setup, running, and
> importing correctly however I'm seeing odd
: I don't know how to accomplish this off the top of my head
: OOB, I'd guess your client would have to manage the
: substitutions and then just index separate fields...
an UpdateProcessor would proably be the best place to apply logic like
this to completley add/replace the value of a mapped_fi
: Here is the stack trace
what exactly does your fl param look like when you get this error? and
what exactly are the field/fieldType declarations for each of the fields
in your fl?
Because if i'm reading this correctly, Solr thinks you are trying to
include in the response the results of a
Hi, my previous message was partially wrong:
Please note that ANY IMAGINABLE SOLUTION will use encoding/decoding; and the
real question is "where should it happen?"
A. (Solr) Java Container is responsible for UTF-16 <-> Java String
B. "Client" will do UTF-8 <->UTF-16 before submit
If I use dismax parser in the query, I knew I can't give field:value to the
q.
The following query works fine.
/select/?defType=dismax&pf=title^2&q="obama%20budget"&qf=title
But I want these results when content_type:video only. Where can I add
content_type:video in the query, so that I can give
Something is missing from the body of your Email... As I pointed in my
previous message, "in general" Solr can index _everything_ (provided that
you have Tokenizer for that); but, additionally to _indexing_ you need an
HTTP-based _search_ which must understand UTF-16 (for instance)
Easiest solutio
Thanks for all the responses. Problem partially solved (see below)
1. In a sense, my question is theoretical since the input to out SOLR server
is (currently) UTF-8 files produced by a third party text extraction utility
(not Tika). On the server side, we read and index the text via a custom data
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:04 AM, lavesh wrote:
> I know this is possible in Solr which do the grouping irrespective of one
> values. i.e below line do the grouping based on column1 considering all
> filters except the column column1
>
> &facet.field={!ex=column1}column1
>
> now i wana know can i d
No, not in the schema but in the solrconfig. Look for your request handler such
as the default:
you can add a default value for the sort parameter
field desc
-Original message-
> From:A Geek
> Sent: Wed 03-Oct-2012 16:53
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: how to speci
DK,
myFieldName just inside the
tag in schema.xml still works, but is considered deprecated.
Otherwise it's specified using a df param in the definition of your
search handler in solrconfig.xml:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SearchHandler#df
Michael Della Bitta
--
Hi all, Is there a way to specify the default sort fields in the solr schema in
3.6 or 4.0Beta? similar to the default search operator. Like, the default
search operator can be set to "OR" and only when you want to override you pass
it in the search URL as "AND". I have lots of fields related t
Hi,
I'm working on a special requirement for matching. One thing is confusing
me, I can't find a good way to solve it.
Doc A has keywords "Car Dealer", "Car Repair"
Doc B has keywords "Car Washing", "Car Clean"
I have a "Optional Keywords" list that contains keywords like "Dealer".
If my query
Hi Otis,
Could you give me an example about how to write a multiple core join?
Thanks
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Solr join does work across multiple cores, as long as they are in the same
> JVM.
>
> Otis
> --
> Search Analytics - htt
Here is the stack trace
Oct 3, 2012 3:07:38 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: can not use FieldCache on
multivalued field: store_slug
at
org.apache.solr.schema.SchemaField.checkFieldCacheSource(SchemaField.java:174)
at org.apach
Hi Esteban,
A year ago, we tried to use the Apache Solr PECL extension but we were
unable to install it, much less use it. We ended up using the
Solr-PHP-client. It has worked perfectly for a year and we have had zero
problems with it. We haven't tried using Solarium. Good luck!
cheers,
Trav
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj
See the section "Setting the request writer" for
server.setRequestWriter(new BinaryRequestWriter());
Best
Erick
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Radim Kolar wrote:
>
>> Have you looked javabin?
>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/javabin
>
> i checked that page:
Have you looked javabin?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/javabin
i checked that page:
"binary format used to write out solr's response"
so, its for solr response only, not for request sent to solr.
Maurizio:
DIH is great for its intended purpose, but when things get complex I generally
prefer writing something in SolrJ, it gives much finer-grained control
over "special circumstances". Plus, you can see everything that
happens. Here's a blog with a skeletal SolrJ program, you can just
pull ou
Matej,
During/right before indexing. What is stored is the original.
Indexing ! = storing
--
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm
On Oct 3, 2012 6:03 AM, "tech.vronk" wrote:
>
> Thank you Erick, that would explain the behaviour.
>
> But it leaves me with the question:
> When are al
Billy,
Have you tied
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#ScriptTransformer ?
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> Hi Billy,
>
> There is nothing in Solr that will do XML parsing and link extraction,
> so you'll need to do that part. Once you do that have a look a
Thank you Erick, that would explain the behaviour.
But it leaves me with the question:
When are all the analyzers/filters applied
when not during indexing?
I mean, if I define a lowercase filter on a field,
if it is not applied on the input stream before storing
so that I have a lowercased text
Hi,
My application is working fine with normal search (*/select?q=*) using SOLR.
Normal Query URL:
solr/select?q=title:lovely
Now want to implement More Like This (MLT) in my application. Configured MLT
in SOLr below like this.
solrconfig.xml
--
title
Hi All,
I am using solrJ. When there is search query hit, I am logging the url
in a location and also it is getting logged into tomcat catalina logs.
Now I wanted to implement a functionality of periodically(per week)
analyzing search logs of solr and find out the keywords searched. Is there
a
35 matches
Mail list logo