Hi Mikhail,
sorry, my fault. This was one of my first ideas. My problem is, that I've
1.000.000 documents, each with about 20 attributes. Additionally each document
has between 200 and 500 option-value pairs. So if I denormalize the data, it
means that I've 1.000.000 x 350 (200 + 500 / 2) = 350
Regarding https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-758 (Enhance
DisMaxQParserPlugin to support full-Solr syntax and to support alternate
escaping strategies.)
I'm updating from solr 1.4.1 to 3.6.1 (I'm aware that it is not beautiful).
After applying the attached patches to 3.6.1 I'm experienc
Hi Erick,
I cannot migrate to 4.0-ALPHA or 4.0-BETA because of the dependency in
configuration as part of indexing in solrconfig.xml and schema.xml.
When I try to use 4.0 version, I get a series of errors that pops up. Also
I cannot change the entire configuration files that are available to me.
Hi, Otis
Thanks your reply.
yes, all cores are in same server.
* what do you consider "too long"?
just id(key) query response takes too long.
almost id(key) query response takes under 10ms.
example
-
2012-10-05 16:38:32,078 [http-8080-exec-3979] INFO
org.apache.solr.core.Solr
well basically i was about to explain and ask once more for your opinions but
this morning i just wanted to try something in the source code and it
succeeded... so here is what i want and i did for getting it:
What I wanted: .
The exact thing I want to is similar to "score" field. Normally it al
Erik,
Thanks for all the help, what a great community.
Unfortunately the 2 data sets I want to use the DIH for change a ton and are
changed by a web app accessible to a number of people, as well as a few other
internal server applications. Since the data sets were a small figured
re-indexin
We're running 10 solr cores(c00,c01,...,c09) in a box and querying like
http://x.x.x.x/c00/select?q=test&shards=c00,c01,..,c09
This means all of the result are merged in core c00.
Is this not good use in shards search?
When we analyze log file, query response time in core c00 is often too long.
How
i am reading this: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud section
Re-sizing a Cluster
Its possible to add shard to an existing index? I do not need to get
data redistributed, they can stay where they are, its enough for me if
new entries will be distributed into new number of shards. restarting
Hi!
I was wondering if there are any built-in mechanism that allow me to store the
queries made to a solr server inside the index itself. I know that the
suggester module exist, but as far as I know it only works for terms existing
in the index, and not with queries. I remember reading about us
Yep, the query results are stored on the server. All you get
back on the client side is the XML you see, there's nothing
else magically stored on the client.
Best
Erick
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Jie Sun wrote:
> Hi Erik,
> no I dont have any evidence, just a precaution question.
> So acco
Hi Erik,
no I dont have any evidence, just a precaution question.
So according to your explanation, this cache only keep the document ID, so
if client paying to next group of document in the window, there will be
another query to solr server to retrieve these docs, correct?
ok that is good to kno
I wouldn't worry about it too much. The search result cache is really cheap,
each entry is simply a long value so even if you cache a lot of values it's not
much memory... It does _not_ cache the entire document.
Do you have any evidence that this will cause you problems or is this
theoretical?
My personal approach would be to take DIH
out of the mix entirely and do the whole thing in SolrJ
where you can exercise control to whatever degree
you want. DIH is a fine tool, but sometimes it's wrong
for a particular situation.
Here's some code to get you started if you want to
go that route.
any suggestions?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/queryResultWindowSize-vs-rows-tp401p4012336.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
There's a difference between q={!myparser f=field}value and
q=field:value&defType=myparser in that the latter requires that your parser do
the splitting of "field" at the colon. Does your parser do this? The former
allows for a local param to specify the f(ield) through a params construct
au
Walter,
Thanks! You bring up a very important 'commit' problem which I had
not thought about. So I am running a DIH that is wiping out part of
the index (ie all animals), then re-indexing/re-importing. I have
another DIH that is wiping out part if the index (minerals), then
re-indexing/re-impor
Rajani,
IIRC solrmeter can grab search phrases from log. There is a special command
for doing it there. Right - Tool/Extract Queries.
Regards
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Rajani Maski wrote:
> Hi Davide, Yes right. This can be done.
>
> Just one question, I am not sure if I had to cr
17 matches
Mail list logo
