I will love to cover other parts of SOLR management.
If you have any Solr quiz question on mind, please send it to me and I will
insert it to the quiz (and to the site).
Together we can make a good SOLR quiz questions for the community.
Thank you all.
Yulia
Thanks Otis for the response.
1. Is there any performance impact if the client is invoking the solr index
using the VIP url instead of individual shard URLs? If the default sharding
of SOLR is based on uniqueId.hashcode % numServers, how does the SOLR
identify which Shard to get the data if
Hi,
Where is that lock file located? I triggered it again (in another contrib) and
wil trigger it again in the future and don't want to remove my ivy cache each
time :)
Thanks
-Original message-
From:Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com
Sent: Tue 30-Oct-2012 15:14
To:
you will have to use 'find' on your .ivy2 !
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
Hi,
Where is that lock file located? I triggered it again (in another contrib)
and wil trigger it again in the future and don't want to remove my ivy cache
each time
As I remember, the underlying algorithm enumerates all the unique values
in the field when doing the join (or something like that). So when the
filed you're joining has many unique values, it performs poorly. Worse,
it'll be fine on small data sets, the kind we usually develop with. But then
when
You need to provide significantly more information than you have.
What are your perf requirements? How big is your data set? What
kinds of searches are you talking about here? How are you
measuring response?
This really feels like an XY problem.
Best
Erick
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:33 AM,
There's no real magic about the index structure, it's just the
same as non-cloud Solr. So presumably you have
example and example2 directories or some such.
They're just standard Solr installations with the
index in the usual place, the docs for the particular
shard are stored in the data/index
Hi,
I have created Solr XML data source. In that I want to make range query on int
field which is price.
But by default it is considering that field as text. So I have added Price in
the fields section making price as int,
Indexed=true, Search by default=true, Stored=true, Include in
Welcome all,
We have a very strange problem with SOLR 3.5. It SOMETIMES throws exceptions:
2012-10-31 10:20:06,408 SEVERE [org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore:185]
(http-10.205.49.74-8080-155) org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:
ERROR: [doc=MyDoc # d3mo1351674222122-1 # 2012-10-31 08:03:42.122]
Hello!
Look at what Solr returns in the error - you send the following value
java.math.BigDecimal:1848.66 - remove the java.math.BigDecimal:
and your problem should be gone.
--
Regards,
Rafał Kuć
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch - ElasticSearch
Welcome all,
We
It _looks_ like somehow the string you're sending as a BigDecimal is,
literally, java.math.BigDecimal:1848.66 rather than 1848.66. How are
you generating the field value? I'm guessing that your (SolrJ?) program is
somehow messing this up...
Best
Erick
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Marcin
Is this LucidWorks? You'll need to ask on the LucidWorks forums if so.
Best
Erick
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Leena Jawale
leena.jaw...@lntinfotech.comwrote:
Hi,
I have created Solr XML data source. In that I want to make range query on
int field which is price.
But by default it is
Hi,
Besides replication issues (see other thread) we're also seeing these warnings
in the logs on all 10 nodes and for all cores using today's or yesterday's
trunk.
2012-10-31 11:01:03,328 WARN [solr.core.CachingDirectoryFactory] - [main] - :
No lockType configured for
On 31 October 2012 16:56, Leena Jawale leena.jaw...@lntinfotech.com wrote:
Hi,
I have created Solr XML data source. In that I want to make range query on
int field which is price.
But by default it is considering that field as text. So I have added Price
in the fields section making price
First we were adding BigDecimal object to SolrInputDocument directly
as field value.
Now we are adding BigDecimal.toPlainString() as field value.
SOLR relies on JavaBinCodec class which does de/serialization in it's
own way - some kind of bug in there?
I don't know what is the proper way to
I have a similar issue, and I am solving it by implementing my own
components and dealiing with the resultings doc IDs
public class MerchantShuffleComponent extends SearchComponent {
...
ctx.docs = shuffledDocList;
rb.rsp.getValues().remove(response);
rb.rsp.add(response,
Hi,
After upgrading from Solr 4.0.0-Beta to Solr 4.0.0 we are getting this error
from ALL the leader nodes:-
Oct 31, 2012 6:44:03 AM
org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor
doDefensiveChecks
SEVERE: ClusterState says we are the leader, but locally we don't think so
Is there
Thanks Chris,
seems it is working fine, below is the query
http://localhost:8993/solr/select?q=*:*fq=(!tag=test)name:test*fq=(!tag=test1)name:test1fq=(!tag=test3)name:test3facet=truefacet.range={!key=test
ex=test1,test3}Admission_Datefacet.range={!key=test1
By trunk do you mean 4X or 5X?
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
Hi,
Besides replication issues (see other thread) we're also seeing these
warnings in the logs on all 10 nodes and for all cores using today's or
yesterday's trunk.
2012-10-31
That's 5, the actual trunk/
-Original message-
From:Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com
Sent: Wed 31-Oct-2012 16:29
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: No lockType configured for NRTCachingDirectory
By trunk do you mean 4X or 5X?
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Markus
If you can share any logs, that would help as well.
- Mark
Hello,
Same as Sam, I believe the SWAP command is important for important use
cases.
For example, with Solr 3, we do use Current and Temp cores, so that
incremental updates to the index are done live on Current, as well as
searches.
Whenever a full/baseline/from scratch index need to be
Mark,
We have tried the following:-
1. Removing everything in the ZooKeeper snapshot directory
2. Removing the indexes
We get the same error in both the cases.
Attached the cloud dumps:- cloud_dump.json
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n4017315/cloud_dump.json
Thanks,
Balaji
--
Just created the defect in Jira.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4020
Thanks.
On 31 October 2012 10:47, Indika Tantrigoda indik...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the reply Chris.
Yes you are correct, SolrJ is serializing a String[] instead of the
separate String values.
Using
Sure. here are some more details:
1) we are having 30M ~ 60M documents per node (right now we have 4 nodes,
but that will increase in the future). Documents are relatively small
(around 3K), but 99% searches must be returned within 200ms and this is
measured by test drivers sitting right in
: SOLR relies on JavaBinCodec class which does de/serialization in it's
: own way - some kind of bug in there?
:
: I don't know what is the proper way to handle BigDecimal values in
: SOLR 3.5 after all?
The safe thing to do is only add primitive java objects that Solr
understands natively -
A big difference if you are using tomcat is that you still need to
specify jetty.port - unless you change the name of that sys prop in
solr.xml.
Some more below:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
How are you?I followed SolrCloud Wiki tutorial
Hi,
Is the AnalyzingQueryParser ported to SOLR? I read that it it available in
Lucene. Not sure about SOLR.
We are trying to workaround this limitation:-
On wildcard and fuzzy searches, no text analysis is performed on the search
word.
Hi,
Not sure if I follow your requirements correctly, but it sounds like
you may be looking for phrase queries (as opposed to term/keyword
queries).
Otis
--
Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html
On Wed,
Hi,
I didn't follow the thread, but maybe you are looking for fq=(name1
OR name2 OR ) for those 100 names you mentioned, so that 1 doesn't
filter out the other 99.
Otis
--
Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
Performance Monitoring -
Hi,
I apologize for the trivial question, but I cannot find out what is wrong. I
try to switch from Solr 3.6 to Solr 4.0. All what I have done was I have
downloaded and unzipped the official binary file for Windows (32 bit) and run
just an example and it does not work.
In Solr 3.6 the request
We are trying to workaround this limitation:-
On wildcard and fuzzy searches, no text analysis is
performed on the search
word.
I think http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultitermQueryAnalysis is a more elegant
way to deal with this.
Dear Lev,
core0 is only available on multicore environment. You should start Solr as
java -Dsolr.solr.home=multicore -jar start.jar
cheers,
Péter
2012/10/31 Tannen, Lev (USAEO) [Contractor] lev.tan...@usdoj.gov:
Hi,
I apologize for the trivial question, but I cannot find out what is wrong. I
The right address to go is http://localhost:8983/solr/ on Solr 4.0.
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin links to nothing if you go check the
servlet.
Cheers
James
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Tannen, Lev (USAEO) [Contractor]
lev.tan...@usdoj.gov wrote:
Hi,
I apologize for the trivial
Scoring or ranking of document relevancy is called similarity. You can
create your own similarity class, or even have a field-specific similarity
class.
See, for example:
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_0_0/core/org/apache/lucene/search/similarities/TFIDFSimilarity.html
I would like to lower or eliminate
the contribution of the fieldNorm
on some searches. I figured that a LocalParam might help,
but I cannot
find any documentation on it. Is there documentation on how
to reduce
the consideration for tf, idf, fieldNorm, and coord? Where
is that?
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
omitNorms=true|false
This is arguably an advanced option. Set to true to omit the norms associated
with this field (this disables length normalization and index-time boosting
for the field, and saves some memory). Only
You could write a custom search component that checked for your desired
request parameters, and then it could set them for a custom similarity
class, which you would also have to write.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Dotan Cohen
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 6:07 PM
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Jack Krupansky
j...@basetechnology.com wrote:
Scoring or ranking of document relevancy is called similarity. You can
create your own similarity class, or even have a field-specific similarity
class.
See, for example:
: The right address to go is http://localhost:8983/solr/ on Solr 4.0.
: http://localhost:8983/solr/admin links to nothing if you go check the
: servlet.
For back compat, http://localhost:8983/solr/admin should automatially redirect
to
http://localhost:8983/solr/#/ -- regardless of wether you
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com wrote:
You could write a custom search component that checked for your desired
request parameters, and then it could set them for a custom similarity
class, which you would also have to write.
Perhaps, but if I'm going
Hi iorixxx, this is how we our email field defined.
fieldType name=text_email class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer
tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/
filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/
filter
I second the original poster- all selects are blocked during commits.
I have Master replicating to Slave.
Indexing happens to Master, few docs/about every 30 secs
Selects are run against Slave.
This is the pattern from the Slave log:
Oct 30, 2012 12:33:23 AM
Hi,
That should work just fine. It;s either a bug or you are doing something
you didn't mention. Maybe you can provide a small, self-enclosed unit test
and stick it in JIRA?
Otis
--
Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
Performance Monitoring -
And - just to get stupid options out of the way - you don't have any
parameters defined on the handlers that may list the fields to return?
Regards,
Alex.
Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
- Time is the quality of nature
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Otis Gospodnetic
otis.gospodne...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
That should work just fine. It;s either a bug or you are doing something
you didn't mention. Maybe you can provide a small, self-enclosed unit test
and stick it in JIRA?
I would assume that it's me
- I tried using HttpSolrServer, but had some problems and some news
groups mentioned that it is buggy and I should be using
CommonsHttpSolrServer. So, I am using CommonsHttpSolrServer. But both
approaches does not work.
- I have tried using SOLR 4.0 as well as 3.6.1. I get errors in both
47 matches
Mail list logo
