Hi,
Exists some issue open in the Solr Project about this issue?
Thanks
-
Best regards
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Atomic-Updates-Payloads-Non-stored-data-tp4006678p4023789.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Hoss,
my config has definately not changed and it worked with 3.6 and 3.6.1.
Yes I have a custom plugin and if q was empty with 3.6 it picked automatically
q.alt from solrconfig.xml.
This all was done with params.get()
With 4.x this is gone due to some changes in DefaultSolrParams(?).
Which is
You can't. I guess you could extract those numbers from your text and
index them into a separate numeric field.
Upayavira
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012, at 07:08 AM, jend wrote:
Hi,
Im building a solr install which has a blurb of data in a field
description.
In that field there are sentences such as
Yeah, there are a bunch, some of which have been around for years. It's not
an easy problem given the structure of the index.
Can't come up with the JIRAs right now, sorry.
Best
Erick
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 8:13 AM, yriveiro yago.rive...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Exists some issue open in the
Bernd -
There never has been, nor is there now, a method that looks for q and falls
back to q.alt. The logic for that is purely in DisMaxQParser.java:
if (userQuery == null || userQuery.trim().length() 1) {
// If no query is specified, we may have an alternate
altUserQuery =
This is very helpful. Thanks a lot, Shaun and Dikchant!
So in default single-core situation, the index would live in data/index,
correct?
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 11/30/2012 10:11 PM, Joe Zhang wrote:
May I ask: how to set up multiple
Mark Miller-3 wrote
FYI, I've fixed this 5x issue a few days ago.
- Mark
Yep, after the patch, it is not occuring anymore, thank you
-
Zeki ama calismiyor... Calissa yapar...
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
A bit hard to tell without seeing all system and Solr metrics, but the
first thing I'd look at is disk IO. Yes, you may warm up the index, but
you still have some new data on disk after replication, so if a user query
hits data in newly copied blocks, it will *have to* be read from disk.
Chris Hostetter-3 wrote
w/o more information about how/where you add this information, it's going
to be really hard to give you suggestions on how to fix your problem.
The modifications I made is nearly the same with score field. Basically I
have added a PositionAugmenter class, modified
deniz wrote
after these, I guess i need to check how the request is distributed on
cloud... any ideas where I should start checking?
as for replying my own question (hopefully correct) I have started digging
org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler.handleRequestBody which
loops (i
Hi,
I am trying to apply SOLR for Turkish Language for my research.
Instead of using language identification, I manually assigned Turkish
language for a sample test document. I have configured SOLR schema.xml,
activated the part below. I have added the attached document
testTurkishDoc.xml that
Have you tried using the Solr Admin Analysis page, using the word and a few
words of context for index analysis and the word alone for query analysis?
And be sure to fully reindex if you change ANYTHING in the schema fields or
field types.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Erol Akarsu
Sent: Sunday,
I defined the following data type in my solr schema.xml
fieldtype name=testkeep class=solr.TextField
analyzer
filter class=solr.KeepWordFilterFactory words=keepwords.txt
ignoreCase=false/
/analyzer
/fieldtype
when I use the type testkeep to index a test field, my true expecation
was
If the value for id field is the same, the old entry will be update; if
it is new, a new entry will be created indexed.
This is my experience. :)
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Joe Zhang smartag...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear list,
I just want to confirm an expected behavior of solr:
Assuming
Thanks!
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Xi Shen davidshe...@gmail.com wrote:
If the value for id field is the same, the old entry will be update; if
it is new, a new entry will be created indexed.
This is my experience. :)
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Joe Zhang smartag...@gmail.com
Sorry I didn't make it perfectly clear. The id field is URL.
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Joe Zhang smartag...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks!
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Xi Shen davidshe...@gmail.com wrote:
If the value for id field is the same, the old entry will be update; if
it is
By the definition on
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/api-3_6_1/org/apache/solr/analysis/KeepWordFilter.html,
I am pretty sure it is the correct behavior of this filter :)
I guess you are trying to this filter to index some special words in
Chinese?
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Joe Zhang
how to add a dictionary in lucene? please give an example.
because I want to develop IndonesianStemmer by adding Indonesian dictionary.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-Adding-Dictionary-tp4023888.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
I think I have figured out this... at least some kinda..
After putting logs here there in the code, especially in SolrCore,
HttpShardHandler, SearchHandler classes, it seems like sorting is done after
all of the shards finish responding and then before we see the results the
result set is
yes, that is the correct behavior. But how do I achieve my goal, i.e,
speical treatment on a list of uppercase/special words, normal treatment on
everything else?
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Xi Shen davidshe...@gmail.com wrote:
By the definition on
To be more specific, this is the data type I was using:
fieldType name=textspecial class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer
tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/
filter class=solr.KeepWordFilterFactory
In other words, what I wanted to achieve is case-senstive indexing on a
small set of words. Can anybody help?
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Joe Zhang smartag...@gmail.com wrote:
To be more specific, this is the data type I was using:
fieldType name=textspecial class=solr.TextField
22 matches
Mail list logo
