Can any one help me ??
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:07 AM, nihed mbarek nihe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
What is the utility of FieldFlags on ResponseBuilder ??
I saw a set on QueryComponent and want to have more information about this
attribute.
Regards,
Thanks to everyone for the suggestions, :).
Gian Maria
-Original Message-
From: Upayavira [mailto:u...@odoko.co.uk]
Sent: mercoledì 12 dicembre 2012 14:49
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr3 and solr4 side by side in tomcat on windows
You will need to create a context
Hi Tom,
This is great. Should make it to the documentations.
Regards,
Aloke
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Burgmans, Tom
tom.burgm...@wolterskluwer.com wrote:
I am also busy with getting this clear. Here are my notes so far (by
copying and writing myself):
queryWeight = the impact
What do you mean? Could you explain your use case?
Tomás
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 9:36 AM, nihed mbarek nihe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to define a custom search for a fieldType on a schema ? ?
Regards,
--
M'BAREK Med Nihed
actually, I have as schema albums with
artist / album_name / album_description
When I made a search without query the result is (having the some score) :
artist A
artist A
artist A
artist B
artist B
artist B
artist C
artist C
= depends on my indexing process
what I want as result :
artist A
Not sure I fully understood this and maybe you already cover that by
'merge', but if you know what you gave the client last time, you can just
build a differential as a second core, then on client mount that second
core and merge it into the first one (e.g. with DIH).
Just a thought.
Regards,
If you want that exact circular result I think the only option is to have
an extra field, pre calculated (according to these needs, for example,
incrementing a value for each document for the same artist or something
like that) and sort on that field.
If what you need is to show the artists,
Hi all,
We are seeing a strange problem on our 2-node solr4 cluster. This problem
has resultet in data loss.
We have two servers, varnish01 and varnish02. Zookeeper is running on
varnish02, but in a separate jvm.
We index directly to varnish02 and we read from varnish01. Data is thus
replicated
Couple things to start:
By default SolrCloud distributes updates a doc at a time. So if you have 1
shard, whatever node you index too, it will send updates to the other.
Replication is only used for recovery, not distributing data. So for some
reason, there is an IOException when it tries to
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, the main problem with it didn't really occur to me until I saw the
properties shard in the cluster view.
I started working on the UI to ignore it the other day and then never got
there because I was getting all
Perhaps you could use two indexed fields, one with synonym expansion and one
without.
wunder
On Dec 12, 2012, at 11:33 PM, Burgmans, Tom wrote:
In our case it's the opposite. For our clients it is very important that
every synonym gets equal chances in the relevancy calculation. The fact
: Can anyone explain or provide some links?
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#How_are_documents_scored
-Hoss
Hello,
As I understand it, MoreLikeThis only requires term frequencies, not
positions or offsets. So in order to save disk space I would like to store
termvectors, but without positions and offsets. Is there documentation
somewhere that
1) would confirm that MoreLikeThis only needs term
Try the Solr Admin Analyzer page to see how Solr is indexing that text. I
suspect that the ShingleFilter is generating extra terms with positions so
that PhraseQuery no longer sees the two terms from your quoted phrase as
being adjacent.
Your second query is simply generating a Boolean AND or
: I am trying to use the EmbeddedSolrServer to connect to the general
: core that is already running:
that is not going to work. EmbeddedSolrServer is solely for running solr
entirely contained inside your application, w/o using a servlet container
-- it doesn't support any of the HTTP based
The only custom code I have are 3 custom transformers for my DIH.
Here is the code.
package org.build.com.solr;
/**
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
* contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
* this work for additional
In our current architecture, we use a staging core to perform full re-indexes
while the live core continues to serve queries. After a full re-index we use
the core admin to swap the live and stage index. Both the live and stage
core are on the same solr instance.
In our new architecture we want
As far as I know, if replication fails, the old index will still be used.
There will be some performance impact during replication simply because of
network and disk IO, and of course the JVM Solr is in will be doing more
work. But I think you can throttle replication. or maybe not, I can't
Hi,
We've done something very similar to this before. We implemented it as a
custom SearchComponent with a pluggable hit (re)ordering mechanism.
Otis
--
SOLR Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html
Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
On
: SEVERE: The web application [/apache-solr-4.0.0] created a ThreadLocal with
: key of type [org.apache.solr.schema.DateField.ThreadLocalDateFormat] (value
It's a long standing issue...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2357
In practice it shouldn't really cause you any problems.
Hi Alex,
You got my point right. What I see is merge adds duplicate document. Is
there a way to overwrite existing document in one core by another. Can
merge operation lead to data corruption, say in case when the core on
client had uncommitted changes.
What would be a better solution for my
Do you have IDs defined? How do you expect Sold to know they are duplicate
records? Maybe the issue is there somewhere.
Regards,
Alex
On 13 Dec 2012 15:17, Dikchant Sahi contacts...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alex,
You got my point right. What I see is merge adds duplicate document. Is
there a
this is related to my previous post where I did not get any feedback yet...
I am going through a practice to reduce the disk usage by solr index files.
first step I took was to move some fields from stored to not stored. this
reduced the size of .fdt by 30-60%.
very promising... however I
I am indexing documents with Solr 4.0 and also processing the text
using a set of custom entity extractors (people, places, dates, times,
etc). The text field in Solr has Term Vectors enabled as well as term
positions and offsets, primarily so we can make use of Fast Vector
Highlighting. So far,
lucene index structure:
product_name type price
---
iphone4s mobile 2000
iphone5 mobile 5000
S3 mobile 3000
intel i3 pc 1000
intel i5
You could do it... if you wrote your own ValueSource that went out and did
the sum of the named field for the selected documents end then you could use
it in a function query in the fl field list.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: cmd.ares
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012
Hi,
You can add stats=truestats.field=type to your query.
Then you get a stats section in your result which includes the sum of the
choosen field.
Cheers,
Markus
cmd.ares cmd.a...@gmail.com wrote:
lucene index structure:
product_name type price
And add stats.facet=type - and then you would get a sum of price for each
type.
So,
?q=*:*stats=truestats.field=pricestats.facet=type
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Markus Mirsberger
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:41 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject:
lucene index structure:
product_name type price
---
iphone4s mobile 2000
iphone4s mobile 1500
iphone5 mobile 5000
iphone5 mobile 5000
S3
Yes, we have an uniqueId defined but merge adds two documents with the same
id. As per my understanding this is how Solr behaves. Correct me if am
wrong.
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
arafa...@gmail.comwrote:
Do you have IDs defined? How do you expect Sold to know they
Using Toms reply i have got most of the terms,
The following is my understanding of a single doc score,
5.528805 = (MATCH) sum of: (sum of scores = 0.08775589 + 5.441049)
0.08775589 = (MATCH) weight(text:sachin in 286) [DefaultSimilarity], result
of:
0.08775589 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0 =
Hi,
Can anyone please guide me to use SolrPhpClient? The documents available
are not clear. As to where to place SolrPhpClient?
I have downloaded SolrPhpClient and have changed the following lines,
specifying the path (where the files are present in my computer)
32 matches
Mail list logo
