I am using the follow command with commit:
curl 'http://:/solr/update/json?commit=true' --data-binary
@books.json -H 'Content-type:application/json'
So I assume this is hard commit?
Thanks,
Lili
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-only-partial-res
thanks for the respond, i will try it and report back ...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-3-6-1-tp4028502p4028675.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Put parentheses around the original query and your new contraint and
separate them with "AND":
(...) AND (...)
Either of those sub-queries could have any complexity of AND and OR.
Or,
Put the constraint query into a filter query: &fq=... , which will limit the
query results as specified.
If I do a free text search for a keyword over all my fields using the query
winston churchill
town:*winston churchill* OR label:*winston churchill* OR name:*winston
churchill* OR office:*winston churchill*
I get plenty of results. But If I want to filter the searches down to towns. So
Winston Ch
On 12/21/2012 3:31 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: My Solr 4.1 dev server doesn't seem to have a problem handling this. I see a
: substantially similar exception when I send a similar request.
:
: I have a clarification, at least for 4.1: That specific exception is when it's
: a large negative numb
: My Solr 4.1 dev server doesn't seem to have a problem handling this. I see a
: substantially similar exception when I send a similar request.
:
: I have a clarification, at least for 4.1: That specific exception is when it's
: a large negative number - larger than the numFound of the query. W
Thank you very much! This is a good starting point!
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Have you seen the functions here:
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#Relevance_Functions
>
> Best
> Erick
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Joe Zhang wrote:
>
> > Dear list,
Thanks Otis, will do.
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis.gospodne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 7:01 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: occasional GC crashes
Hi Robi,
Oh that's the thing of the past, go for the latest Java 7 if they let
The only sure way to get the last searchable document is to use a
timestamp or sequence number in the document. I do not think that using
a timestamp with default=NOW will give a unique timestamp, so you need
your own sequence number.
On 12/19/2012 10:17 PM, Joe wrote:
I'm using SOLR 4 for an
At least it looks like your hitting that - based on it mentioning no frame of
reference to use to sync with - more importantly though, your also hitting
another issue - see my email to the user list:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201212.mbox/%3cd0994a2d-04b0-4a80-af07
Your hitting https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3939
The luck of hashing must have left the guy trying to become the leader without
any docs. Due to SOLR-3939, a node with an empty index cannot become the leader.
- Mark
On Dec 21, 2012, at 1:41 PM, gumatias wrote:
> I'm getting the sa
I'm getting the same error. I followed the SolrCloud examples and it didn't
work.. here's basically what I've done:
EXPERIMENT 1: start shards and index documents, search for documents in all
replicas
# Starting Shards
- Shard1 Leader (with zookeeper)
java -Dbootstrap_confdir=./solr/colle
Hi group,
I'm trying to highlight my complete(!) XML document, which is indexed for that
purpose in a special field called "wkxmlsource". I configured the "wkxmlsource"
field like
And the text_xml fieldtype is almost equal to the text_en field, but with the
as the first class in
the index
I'm working on a system for indexing logs. We're probably looking at
filling one core every month.
We'll maintain a short term index containing the last 7 days - that one
is easy to handle.
For the longer term stuff, we'd like to maintain a collection that will
query across all the historic data,
Thanks for the advice.
Unfortunately what we really need is for the corrections to satisfy fq
params.
Was wondering how bad the perf would be if we're using the same DocSet (or
should it be an OpenBitSet? sorry, I'm still trying to figure all that code
out) for each 'correction query'? Seems like
Hmm…have not seen a report of this before.
For the future, FWIW, if you are in a bad state, the best thing to do is stop
all the replicas in the shard and then start it again. That way everyone will
work together to trade data and determine the best leader.
When you restarted instance 2, instan
How about you 'xml encode' your content, instead of using CDATA:
testing
I don't entirely get what's going on for you. I just did a test, posting
this:
UV1
testing
And query
It looks from your stack trace that your XML document has a value for
"ChemicalNameOfSubstance" yet you do not have such a column defined in
schema.xml. Is this your problem?
The easiest way to get Solr to ignore extra fields that you do not wish to
index or store is to add a "catch-all" dynam
I am working with an xml format named EAD (Encoded Archival
Description). That format need to be precompiled before it can be
digested by solr.
So I just need to store in my index the original XML file.
Maybe I need to work with DIH ?
2012/12/20 Upayavira :
> Solr does not support nested structu
Let me see how easy it is to patch this.
Upayavira
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012, at 12:56 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Nuke 'em or something. This is one of the most annoying "errors" I see.
> I'm
> not a new user, but every time that flashes by I have to look to see what
> happened and think "Oh, it's t
Great, thank you.
> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:42:13 +0100
> From: r@solr.pl
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: facet query
>
> Hello!
>
> Try facet.mincount=1, that should help.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Rafał Kuć
> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch - Elas
Hello!
Try facet.mincount=1, that should help.
--
Regards,
Rafał Kuć
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch - ElasticSearch
> Hi, is there a way with facets to say, return facets that are not
> 0? I have &facet=true&facet.field=office&facet.field=name as my
> facet paramete
Hi, is there a way with facets to say, return facets that are not 0? I have
&facet=true&facet.field=office&facet.field=name as my facet parameters, and
with some of my queries it brings back people that have a value of 0.
Thanks
I've been bitten by caching before too, server-level, browser level,
whatever-level..
FWIW,
Erick
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Per Steffensen wrote:
> Are you using (soft) auto-commit or do you perform a manual commit after
> the documents have been indexed? You can index documents, but th
The index is stored normally but, when i ask the index, all xml markup
is deleted in the response.
For exemple, when i store this field:
I obtain this kind of response when i ask index:
2012/12/20 Alexandre Rafalovitch :
> What happens if you just supply it as CDATA into a string field? S
Just saw this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4134
so I don't think you can do what you want currently without the patch.
Erick
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Hmmm, looks like it might be a bug, but I don't know that code at all.
> Wonder what Yonik would
Have you seen the functions here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#Relevance_Functions
Best
Erick
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Joe Zhang wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> Is there any way to access things such as word frequency, doc frequency in
> solr index?
>
> Thanks!
>
Note that you don't have to re-compile, the latest successful build is
always available, you can find the from here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/NightlyBuilds
FWIW,
Erick
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:36 AM, shreejay wrote:
> Thanks John.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.
Solr doesn't natively handle array types, you probably have to do something
like
for (long l : arryOfLong) {
doc.set(... l );
}
Although I'm not all that familiar with the update set syntax...
FWIW,
Erick
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:26 PM, leonildo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I´m using solr 1.4
>
> Ho
On the solr cloud page, admittedly down the page a ways, is the line below.
Does that apply?
Best
Erick
# try bootstrapping all the conf dirs in solr.xml
java -classpath example/solr-webapp/WEB-INF/lib/*
org.apache.solr.cloud.ZkCLI -cmd bootstrap -zkhost 127.0.0.1:9983
-solrhome example/solr
On
Hmmm, looks like it might be a bug, but I don't know that code at all.
Wonder what Yonik would have to say
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Dikchant Sahi wrote:
> Hi Erick,
>
> The name field is stored. I experience problem only when I update
> multiValued field with multiple values like,
>
Nuke 'em or something. This is one of the most annoying "errors" I see. I'm
not a new user, but every time that flashes by I have to look to see what
happened and think "Oh, it's that thing again".
I added a comment to the JIRA that amounts to "nuke 'em 'til they glow and
shoot 'em in the dark". I
Hi,
we are trying to import medline into a solr core. everthing works fine
except the problem, that in the xml files from medline, sometimes
certain tags are missing. If we define them in the data-config.xml file
for our core, the dataimporthandler throws an exception for every tag,
that is m
Are you using (soft) auto-commit or do you perform a manual commit after
the documents have been indexed? You can index documents, but they wont
be searchable before a (soft) commit has been performed. Even if you are
running with (soft) auto-commit there is not guarantee that the
documents are
Custom routing is a nice improvement for 4.1, but if I understand you
correctly it is probably not what you want to use.
If I understand you correctly you want to make a collection with a
number of slices - one slice for each day (or other period) - and then
make kinda "slicing window" where y
I would start using Solr Cloud now (keep experimenting), so that you
will have a chance to work on setting it up, creating and managing
collection, using it from your clients etc. Solr Cloud is very different
from simple standalone 3.5 Solr, so you have a lot to learn about how it
works before
On 20/12/12 20:19, alx...@aim.com wrote:
Depending on your architecture, why not index the same data into two machines?
One will be your prod another your backup?
Because we're trying to keep costs and complexity low whilst in the
development stage ;-)
But more seriously, this will obviously
The default operator is OR. And the default field is 'text'. So when
So what you did this query:
q=exactText:"how+about" AND content:tomorrow+morning
what you did was:
Find all documents that:
have the terms 'how' and 'about' next to each other in the exactText
field
AND
have the term
Hi,
I have a case where i need to find the results of a query that search for a
exact phrase + other words, for example, if i have a keyword like:
"how about" tomorrow morning
the results that should be fetched should match these criteria:
- containing exact phrase how about <= exactly how about
On 12/21/2012 12:53 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
This is on Solr 3.5.0.
We are getting a java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException when our webapp
sends a query where the start parameter is set to a negative value. This
seems to set off a denial of service problem within Solr. I don't yet
know whether it
Fair enough. The explicit warning on LUCENE_CURRENT means that the
implementers probably thought this through better than I did.
Thanks,
Alex.
Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
- Time is the quality of nature that keeps event
On 12/20/2012 10:37 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
The question is, why do I need luceneMatchVersion? Removing it seems to
throw an exception. But it's presence seems so esoteric that absolute
majority of users will never change it.
Shouldn't it be by default a LUCENE_LATEST as deemed by Solr
42 matches
Mail list logo
