Hi Jack, for the point: "each element of the array as a solr document, with
a group field and a disease field"
Did you mean it this way:
"group1_grp": G1
"disease1_d": 2,
"disease2_d": 3,
"group1_grp": G2
"disease1_d": 2,
"disease2_d": 3,
"disease3_d": 1,
"disease4_d": 1,
similar to
Liu Bo,
Changing the permissions fixed the problem. Thank you for helping me.
Best regards, Jim
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCore-collection1-is-not-available-due-to-init-failure-tp4094869p4095195.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive
You may be better off indexing each element of the array as a solr document,
with a group field and a disease field. Then you can easily and efficiently
add new diseases. Then to query a row, you query for the group field having
the desired group.
If possible, index the array as being sparse -
Hi Erick, Yes it is. But the columns here are dynamically and very
frequently added.They can increase upto 1 million right now. So, 1 document
with 1 million dynamic fields, is it fine? Or any other approach?
While searching through web, I found that docValues are column oriented.
http://searchhub
On 10/11/2013 9:38 AM, Christopher Gross wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>
>> On 10/11/2013 8:17 AM, Christopher Gross wrote:
>>> Is there a spot in a Solr configuration that I can set this up to use
>> HTTPS?
>>
>> From what I can tell, not yet.
>>
>> https://
Isn't this just indexing each row as a separate document
with a suitable ID "groupN" in your example?
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 2:43 PM, David Philip
wrote:
> Hi Erick,
>
>We have set of groups as represented below. New columns (diseases as in
> below matrix) keep coming and we need to add the
Would adding a dummy shard instead of a dummy collection would resolve the
situation? - e.g. editing clusterstate.json from a zookeeper client and
adding a shard with a 0-range so no docs are routed to this core. This core
would be on a separate server and act as the collection gateway.
Hi Erick,
We have set of groups as represented below. New columns (diseases as in
below matrix) keep coming and we need to add them as new column. To that
column, we have values such as 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 (exist, slight, na,
notfound) for respective groups.
While querying we need to get the ent
David:
This feels like it may be an XY problem. _Why_ do you
want to store a 2-dimensional array and what
do you want to do with it? Maybe there are better
approaches.
Best
Erick
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 2:07 AM, David Philip
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a 2 dimension array and want it to be persi
Or you can use custom update preprocessor.
W dniu 11.10.2013 23:02, keshari.prerna pisze:
Hello,
One of my indexing field have NULL values and i want it to be replaces with
0 while indexing itself. So that when i search after indexing it gives me 0
instead of NULL.
This is my data-config.xml
What about using COALESCE in SQL?
like:
select COALESCE(duration, 0) as duration from mytable
On 11 October 2013 22:02, keshari.prerna wrote:
> Hello,
>
> One of my indexing field have NULL values and i want it to be replaces with
> 0 while indexing itself. So that when i search after indexin
David,
We have a similar query in astrophysics, an user can select an area of the
skymany stars out there
I am long overdue in creating a Jira issue, but here you have another
efficient mechanism for searching large number of ids
https://github.com/romanchyla/montysolr/blob/master/contrib
12 matches
Mail list logo
