to index byte array

2014-01-01 Thread sweety
I am converting .doc and .docx files to byte array in c#, now I need to index this byte array of doc files. Is it possible in solr to index byte array of files?? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/to-index-byte-array-tp4108999.html Sent from the Solr - User

Re: to index byte array

2014-01-01 Thread Gora Mohanty
On 1 January 2014 13:37, sweety sweetyshind...@yahoo.com wrote: I am converting .doc and .docx files to byte array in c#, now I need to index this byte array of doc files. Is it possible in solr to index byte array of files?? This does not make much sense: How would one search through a byte

Re: to index byte array

2014-01-01 Thread sweety
For indexing .docx files using tika, requires file system path, but i dont want to give the path. I read in DIH faq's that by using transformer the output can be converted from byte to string. -- View this message in context:

Re: to index byte array

2014-01-01 Thread sweety
For indexing .docx files using tika, requires file system path, but i dont want to give the path. I read in DIH faq's that by using transformer the output can be converted from byte to string. -- View this message in context:

Re: to index byte array

2014-01-01 Thread Gora Mohanty
On 1 January 2014 16:03, sweety sweetyshind...@yahoo.com wrote: For indexing .docx files using tika, requires file system path, but i dont want to give the path. Um, why not? I read in DIH faq's that by using transformer the output can be converted from byte to string. Yes, that can

Re: to index byte array

2014-01-01 Thread sweety
If you consider a client-server architecture, the documents will sent in binary format to server, now for solr this binary format will be the source to index, so i need to index byte array. Also if store this byte-array into db and then index in solr, then will the contents of document be

Re: Grouping results with group.limit return wrong numFound ?

2014-01-01 Thread Liu Bo
hi @Ahmet I've thought about using group.ngroups=true , but when you use group.main=true, there's no ngroups field in the response. and according to http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing, the result might not be correct in solrcloud. I don't like using facet for this but seems have to...

Re: Grouping results with group.limit return wrong numFound ?

2014-01-01 Thread Ahmet Arslan
Hi Liu, Aha now I see ... old format does not display that info. For faceting solution https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2242 could be relevant. By the way how are these things in CollapsingQueryParser?