Hi Sandra,
Excuse me for the late reply.
We use lotsofcores (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LotsOfCores) Solr feature,
around 100 simultaneous loaded cores. But the issue is reproducible with
few less cores.
We also have a high rate of indexing, and also reindexing (atomic update).
We are indexing
I am hosting in windows OS
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Zookeeper-as-Service-tp4110396p4110413.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Greg Preston wrote
[qtp243983770-60] ERROR org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore –
java.io.IOException: cannot uncache file=_1.nvm: it was separately
also created in the delegate directory
at
org.apache.lucene.store.NRTCachingDirectory.unCache(NRTCachingDirectory.java:297)
at
Hi,
We tried to understand why we get a Connection reset exception on the leader
when it tries to foward the documents to one of its replica. We analyzed the GC logs and
we did not see any long GC pauses around the time the exception was thrown.
For 24 hours of gc logs, the max full gc pause
Hi,
I am a new to solr/lucene.
I am trying to do a text analysis on my index. The below error
(screenshot) is shown when I increase the field value length. I have tried
searching in vain for any length specific restrictions in solr.TextField.
There is no error text/exception thrown.
[image:
Can you copy paste the error, for some reason I can not see the image of
the screenshot you posted.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Umapathy S nsupat...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am a new to solr/lucene.
I am trying to do a text analysis on my index. The below error
(screenshot) is shown
Hi,
I have one app where the search part is based currently on something
else than Solr. However, as the scale/demand and complexity grows I am
looking at Solr for a potential better fit, including for some features
currently implemented into scripting layer (so which are not on search
Thanks.
Actually there is no error thrown. Just a red bar appears on top.
I have pasted it on http://snag.gy/U9IiJ.jpg
On 9 January 2014 12:56, Aruna Kumar Pamulapati apamulap...@gmail.comwrote:
Can you copy paste the error, for some reason I can not see the image of
the screenshot you
Thanks, can you paste the text that you were trying to analyze?
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Umapathy S nsupat...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks.
Actually there is no error thrown. Just a red bar appears on top.
I have pasted it on http://snag.gy/U9IiJ.jpg
On 9 January 2014 12:56, Aruna
Hello Cristian,
Have you seen http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Deduplication ?
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Cristian Bichis cri...@imagis.ro wrote:
Hi,
I have one app where the search part is based currently on something else
than Solr. However, as the scale/demand and complexity grows I am
I checked that before. I am using solr-4.6.0. maxFieldLength is not
applicable.
On 9 January 2014 13:23, Aruna Kumar Pamulapati apamulap...@gmail.comwrote:
If you are using a Solr version before 4.0 you should look into.
solrconfig.xml:
maxFieldLength1/maxFieldLength
What is
See if this helps:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/lily-discuss/IaQLpNVJRi8
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Umapathy S nsupat...@gmail.com wrote:
I checked that before. I am using solr-4.6.0. maxFieldLength is not
applicable.
On 9 January 2014 13:23, Aruna Kumar Pamulapati
Hi Mikhail,
I seen deduplication part as well but I have some concerns:
1. Is deduplication supposed to work as well into a check-only (not try
to actually add new record to index) request ? So if I just check to see
if could be some duplicates of some text ?
2. As far as I seen the
Hi,
I have a price field of type tint, from which I will generate a range facet.
And I have now some items in my index that exceed tint type limit (max
integer).
How do I increase tint max integer value?
Here is tint definition in schema.xml:
fieldType name=tint class=solr.TrieIntField
On 09/01/2014 09:44, Karthikeyan.Kannappan wrote:
I am hosting in windows OS
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Zookeeper-as-Service-tp4110396p4110413.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
There are various ways to 'servicify'
It won¹t hit the filter cache if you set {! cache=false} local-param.
On 1/8/14, 12:18 PM, Kranti Parisa kranti.par...@gmail.com wrote:
yes thats the key, these time ranges change frequently and hitting
filtercache then is a problem. I will try few more samples and probably
debug thru it.
Hello,
Here is workaround for caching separate clauses in OR filters.
http://blog.griddynamics.com/2014/01/segmented-filter-cache-in-solr.html
No coding is required, just try to experiment with request parameters.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
@Ahmet:
Thanks, but I also need to be able to search via wildcard and just found
that a - might be resulting in unwanted results. E.g. when using this
query:
Hi,
I tested the BoostQueryParser and it works on the simplified example.
But we need to keep the edismax Query parser, so I tried the following query
and it seems to work (I defined a local bf='' for qq).
q=beautiful Christmas tree
mm=2
qf=title^12 description^2
defType=edismax
From your email I gather your main concern is starting zookeeper on server
startups.
You may want to look at these non-native service oriented options too:
Create a script( cmd or bat) to start ZK on server bootup. This method may not
restart Zk if Zk crashes(not the server).
Create C#
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Cristian Bichis cri...@imagis.ro wrote:
Hi Mikhail,
I seen deduplication part as well but I have some concerns:
1. Is deduplication supposed to work as well into a check-only (not try to
actually add new record to index) request ? So if I just check to see if
Basically a user starts typing the first letters of a city and I want to
return citynames that start with those letters, case-insensitive and not
splitting the cityname on separate words (whether the separator is a
whitespace or a -).
But although the search of a user is case-insensitive, I want
A TrieIntField field can never contain a value greater then java's
Integer.MAX_VALUE -- it doesn't matter what settings you use.
If you want to store larger values, you need to use a TrieLongField and
re-index.
There's also: http://www.tanukisoftware.com/
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Nazik Huq nazik...@yahoo.com wrote:
From your email I gather your main concern is starting zookeeper on server
startups.
You may want to look at these non-native service oriented options too:
Create a script(
Today I setup a simple SolrCloud with tow shards. Seems the same. When I'm
debugging a distributed search I can't catch a break-point at lucene codec
file, but when I'm using faceted search everything looks fine - debugger
stops.
Can anyone help me with my question? Thanks.
--
View this
Hi Peter,
Use KeywordTokenizerFactory instead of Whitespace tokenizer.
Also you might interested in this :
http://www.cominvent.com/2012/01/25/super-flexible-autocomplete-with-solr/
Ahmet
On Thursday, January 9, 2014 6:35 PM, PeterKerk vettepa...@hotmail.com wrote:
Basically a user starts
Thanks that's the response I was searching for. And, I have confirmed that
I need to reindex my data because tlong isnt compatible with tint.
2014/1/9 Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org
A TrieIntField field can never contain a value greater then java's
Integer.MAX_VALUE -- it doesn't
Hi Ahmet,
Thanks. Also for that link, although it's too advanced for my usecase.
I see that by using KeywordTokenizerFactory it almost works now, but when I
search on:
new y, no results are found,
but when I search on new, I do get New York.
So the space in the searchquery is still causing
Question: Does adding replicas help with query load?
Scenario: 3 Physical Machines. 3 Shards
Query any machine, get results. Standard Solr Cloud stuff.
Update Scenario: 6 Physical Machines. 3 Shards.
M = Machine, S = Shard, -L = Leader
M1S1-L
M2S2
M3S3
M4S1
M5S2-L
M6S3-L
Incoming Query to
Absolutely adding replicas helps you scale query load. Queries do not need to
be routed to leaders; they can be handled by any replica in a shard. Leaders
are only needed for handling update requests.
In general, a distributed query has two phases, driven by a controller node
(what you called
I'm searching on cities and returning city and province, some cities exist in
different provinces, which is ok.
However, I have some duplicates, meaning 2 cities occur in the same
province. In that case I only want to return 1 result.
I therefore need to have a distinct and unique city+province
Hi,
I would like to know if I index a file I.e PDF of 100KB then what would be the
size of index. What all factors should be consider to determine the disk size?
Rgds
AJ
Hi Amit,
It really boils down to how much of that 100kb is actually text, and how
you analyze and store the text. Meaning, it's really hard for us to say.
You're probably going to need to experiment to figure out what the storage
needs for your use case are.
Michael Della Bitta
Applications
Thank you, will take a look at it.
Thanks,
Kranti K. Parisa
http://www.linkedin.com/in/krantiparisa
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Mikhail Khludnev
mkhlud...@griddynamics.com wrote:
Hello,
Here is workaround for caching separate clauses in OR filters.
Thanks. We will try with more heap.
And we noticed that zookeeper(open jdk) and Solr(sun jdk) is using different
jvm. Will this really cause this OOM issue ?.
--
View this message in context:
As a follow-up question on this
One would want to use some kind of load balancing 'above' the SolrCloud
installation for search queries, correct? To ensure that the initial requests
would get distributed evenly to all nodes?
If you don't have that, and send all requests to M2S2 (IRT OP),
On 1/9/2014 4:09 PM, Garth Grimm wrote:
As a follow-up question on this
One would want to use some kind of load balancing 'above' the SolrCloud
installation for search queries, correct? To ensure that the initial requests
would get distributed evenly to all nodes?
If you don't have
There is no way to do these things with LUCENE-2899.
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:07 AM, rashi gandhi gandhirash...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I have applied OpenNLP (LUCENE 2899.patch) patch to SOLR-4.5.1 for nlp
searching and it is working fine.
Also I have designed an analyzer for this:
You do need to load balance the initial query request across the SolrCloud
nodes. Solj's CloudSolrServer and LBHttpSolrServer can perform the load
balancing for you in the client. Or you can use a hardware load balancer.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:58
Try running PDF through standalone Tika and see what comes back. That's the
size of the input. It usually be quite a small proportion of PDF size.
Possibly down to metadata only and no text, if your PDF does not include
text layer.
Then, it depends on your storing and indexing options, your
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:34 PM, PeterKerk vettepa...@hotmail.com wrote:
Basically a user starts typing the first letters of a city and I want to
return citynames that start with those letters, case-insensitive and not
splitting the cityname on separate words (whether the separator is a
Hi,
I am testing replication feature of solr 4.x with large index,
unfortunately, that index that we had was for 3.x format. So I copied
the index file and ran the upgrade index utility to convert it to 4.x
format. The utility did, what it is suppose to do and I 4.x index
(verified it with
Hi Peter,
Here are two different ways to do it.
1) Use phrase query q=yourField:new y with the following type.
fieldType name=prefix_full class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=1
analyzer type=index
tokenizer class=solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory /
filter class=solr.TrimFilterFactory /
filter
43 matches
Mail list logo
