Hi;
Could you give more information about your hardware infrastructure and JVM
settings?
Thanks;
Furkan KAMACI
2014-01-30 MayurPanchal mayur.panc...@silvertouch.com:
Hi,
I am working on solr 4.2.1 jetty and we are facing some performance issue
and heap memory overflow issue as well. So i
Hello,
I am currently experimenting to move our Solr instance into a SolrCloud
setup.
I am getting an error trying to access the realtimeget handlers:
HTTP ERROR 404
Problem accessing /solr/collection1/get. Reason:
Not Found
They work fine in the normal Solr setup. Do I need some changes
Hello!
Do you have realtime get handler defined in your solrconfig.xml? This
part should be present:
requestHandler name=/get class=solr.RealTimeGetHandler
lst name=defaults
str name=omitHeadertrue/str
str name=wtjson/str
str name=indenttrue/str
/lst
That seemed to be the issue.
I had several other request handlers as I wasn't using the simple /get, but
apparently in SolrCloud this handler must be present in order to use the
class RealTimeGetHandler at all.
Thank you!
--
View this message in context:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Kuchekar kuchekar.nil...@gmail.com wrote:
docs: [ { id: ABC123, company: [ APPLE ] },
{ id: ABC1234, company: [ APPLE ] },
{ id: ABC1235, company: [ APPLE ] },
{ id: ABC1236, company: [ APPLE ] } ] }, facet_counts: {
facet_queries: { p_company:ucsf\n: 1 },
On 30 January 2014 17:35, Kuchekar kuchekar.nil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mikhail,
I would like my faceting to run only on my resultset
returned as in only on numFound, rather than the whole index.
As far as I know, unless you define filter tagging and exclusion, this
is the
Hello!
No problem. Also remember that you need the _version_ field to be
present in your schema.
--
Regards,
Rafał Kuć
Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics
Solr Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
That seemed to be the issue.
I had several other request
Hi everybody,
I'm working on DSpace 3.2 and I want to change 'Related Documents'
functionality, which is based on Solr MoreLikeThis. Now when I open an item,
below his metadata appears 'Related Documents' where would have to show
other items of actual item's author, but appears items of another
The reason is that although you can configure handlers with any name you
want, internal requests to other shards (other Solr servers) will assume
that the handlers have the default handler names, like /get. Probably that
should be configurable, or have some way of determining what the original
It seems to be faster to first restrict the search space and then do the
scoring compared to just use the full query and let solr handle everything.
For example in my application one of the scoring fields effectivly hits
1/12 of the database (a month field) and if we have 100'' items in the
What does your actual query look like? Is it two range queries and an AND?
Also, you have spaces in your field names, so that makes it more difficult
to write queries since they need to be escaped.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Avner Levy
Sent: Saturday, January 18,
Hi;
I am developing an application that will have an ability to list and edit
SolrCloud config files at Zookeeper. Basically operator will able to see
stopwords, synonyms (also elevator). Operator will edit it from my
dashboard and this files will be updated at Zookeper.
Currently I use
Hi,
I have a strange situation. I created a collection with 4 ndoes
(separate servers, numShards=4), I then proceeded to index data ... all
has been seemingly well until this morning when I had to reboot one of
the nodes.
After reboot, the node I rebooted went into recovery mode! This is
Would probably need to see some logs to have an idea of what happened.
Would also be nice to see the after state of zk in a text dump.
You should be able to fix it, as long as you have the index on a disk, just
make sure it is where it is expected and manually update the clusterstate.json.
On Jan 31, 2014, at 10:13 AM, David Santamauro david.santama...@gmail.com
wrote:
Oh, and I'm assuming shard1 is completely corrupt.
Seems unlikely by the way. Sounds like what probably happened is that for some
reason it thought when you restarted the shard that you were creating it with
On Jan 31, 2014, at 10:31 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems unlikely by the way. Sounds like what probably happened is that for
some reason it thought when you restarted the shard that you were creating it
with numShards=2 instead of 1.
No, that’s not right. Sorry.
It
Here at Appinions, we use mostly m2.2xlarges, but the new i2.xlarges look
pretty tasty primarily because of the SSD, and I'll probably push for a
switch to those when our reservations run out.
http://www.ec2instances.info/
Michael Della Bitta
Applications Developer
o: +1 646 532 3062
Thanks, Shawn. This information is actually not all that shocking to me.
It's always been in the back of my mind that I was getting away with
something in serving from the m1.large. Remarkably, however, it has served
me well for nearly two years; also, although the index has not always been
30GB,
On 01/31/2014 10:35 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
On Jan 31, 2014, at 10:31 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems unlikely by the way. Sounds like what probably happened is that for some
reason it thought when you restarted the shard that you were creating it with
numShards=2
On 01/31/2014 10:22 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
I’d also highly recommend you try moving to Solr 4.6.1 when you can though. We
have fixed many, many, many bugs around SolrCloud in the 4 releases since 4.4.
You can follow the progress in the CHANGES file we update for each release.
Can I do a
solr persistent=“false”
You have to set that to true. When a core starts up, it’s assigned a
coreNodeName. That is persisted in solr.xml.
This will happen every time you restart with persistent=false.
As far as fixing. Yes, you simple want shard1 and remove the replica info.
You would also
On Jan 31, 2014, at 11:15 AM, David Santamauro david.santama...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 01/31/2014 10:22 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
I’d also highly recommend you try moving to Solr 4.6.1 when you can though.
We have fixed many, many, many bugs around SolrCloud in the 4 releases since
4.4. You
Joesph:
Not so much after using some of the settings available on Shawn's Solr Wiki
page: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ShawnHeisey
This is what we're running with right now:
-Xmx6g
-XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
-XX:CMSInitiatingOccupancyFraction=80
Michael Della Bitta
Applications Developer
o:
Can someone clarify what the following options are:
- updatesToLeaders
- shutdownLBHttpSolrServer
- parallelUpdates
Also, I remember in older version of Solr there was an efficient format
that was used between SolrJ and Solr that is more compact. Does this sill
exist in the latest version of
Is there a way to disable commit/hard-commit at runtime? For example, we
usually have our hard commit and soft-commit set really low but when we do
bulk indexing we would like to disable this to increase performance. If
there isn't a an easy way of doing this would simply pushing a new
solrconfig
Why don't you set both solrconfig commits to very high values and issue a
commit command in sparsed, small updates?
I've been doing this for ages and works perfecly for me.
alexei martchenko
Facebook http://www.facebook.com/alexeiramone |
Linkedinhttp://br.linkedin.com/in/alexeimartchenko|
Hi Mikhail,
The Actual result is as following
facet_counts: {
facet_queries: {}, facet_fields: { company: [ Apple, 215, BOSE, 0,
Walmart, 0, Oracle, 25,
...
...
...
... Microsoft,
34, ATT, 45
] }, facet_dates: {}, facet_ranges: {} }
The Expected result would be
It’s not a good idea to disable hard commit because the transaction can grow
without limit in RAM.
Also, try some performance tests. I’ve never seen it matter if it’s set to like
a minute, both for bulk and NRT.
As far as soft commit, you could turn it off and control visibility when adding
Hi friends,
I am facing a strange problem, When I search a term eg .Net , the solr
searches for Net and not includes '.'
Is dot a special character in Solr? I tried escaping it with backslash in
the url call to solr, but no use same resultset,
Also , is there a way to boost some
I didn't mean to disable, just to put some high value there. I have a
script that updates my solr in batches of thousands so I set my commit to
100,000 because when it runs it updates 100,000 records in short time.
The other script updates in batches of hundreds and its not so fast, so its
I'm assuming you mean CloudSolrServer here. If I'm wrong please ignore my
response.
-updatesToLeaders
Only send documents to shard leaders while indexing. This saves cross-talk
between slaves and leaders which results in more efficient document routing.
shutdownLBHttpSolrServer
On Jan 31, 2014, at 1:56 PM, Greg Walters greg.walt...@answers.com wrote:
I'm assuming you mean CloudSolrServer here. If I'm wrong please ignore my
response.
-updatesToLeaders
Only send documents to shard leaders while indexing. This saves cross-talk
between slaves and leaders which
Hi Bojan.
You've got some good ideas here along the lines of some that others have tried.
I've through together a page on the wiki about this subject some time ago that
I'm sure you will find interesting. It references a relevant stack-overflow
post, and also a presentation at DrupalCon
Hi Abhishek,
dot is not a special character. Your field type / analyzer is stripping that
character.
Please see similar discussions and alternative solutions.
http://search-lucene.com/m/6dbI9zMSob1
http://search-lucene.com/m/Ac71G0KlGz
http://search-lucene.com/m/RRD2D1p1mi
Ahmet
On Friday,
Hello,
We are using EdgeNGramFilterFactory to provide partial match on the search
phrase for type ahead/autocomplete. Field type definition
fieldType name=edgytext class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer type=index
tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/
filter
Which of any of these settings would be beneficial when bulk uploading?
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 31, 2014, at 1:56 PM, Greg Walters greg.walt...@answers.com
wrote:
I'm assuming you mean CloudSolrServer here. If I'm wrong please
Just make sure parallel updates is set to true.
If you want to load even faster, you can use the bulk add methods, or if you
need more fine grained responses, use the single add from multiple threads
(though bulk add can also be done via multiple threads if you really want to
try and push the
Hi,
If I issue either a core UNLOAD command, or a collection DELETEREPLICA
command, (which both seem pretty much equivalent) it works but if there are
no other replicas for the shard, then the metadata for the shard is
completely gone in clusterstate.json! That's pretty disconcerting because
Hi,
I'm attempting to come up with a SolrCloud restore / clone process for
either recover to a known good state or to clone the environment for
experimentation. At the moment my process involves either creating a new
zookeeper environment or at least deleting the existing Collection so that I
Be a little careful when looking at on-disk index sizes.
The *.fdt and *.fdx files are pretty irrelevant for the in-memory
requirements. They are just read to assemble the response (usually
10-20 docs). That said, you can _make_ them more relevant by
specifying very large document cache sizes.
What should be better for performance to get those facets that begins with
A?
1.
facet=truefacet.field=conditionsfacet.prefix=A
2.
When indexing create a new field conditions_A, and use it:
facet=truefacet.field=conditions_A
Thoughts?
--
Bill Bell
billnb...@gmail.com
cell 720-256-8076
I am quite sure that the binary flag will be faster as you will just
get a gigantic vector pre-loaded into memory. The problem starts if
you are going to have lots of those prefixes. Then, the memory
requirements may become an issue. Then, the facet becomes more
flexible as it uses the same list
Just to be perfectly clear, it is not a binary field.
conditions = A west side story
conditions = The edge of reason
I look for those strings beginning with A and set that in conditions_A:
conditions_A = A west side story
OK?
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
Ok, so you are pre-partitioning the facet field based on initial
letter. So all the texts that start from A will go into conditions_A
and all the texts that start from C will go into conditions_C.
Interesting approach. Ignore whatever I said before.
If this does not cause other issues, than it is
This is the approach for words that begin with using an alpha-span on the
site:
A B C D E F G ...
The user clicks A and I would use conditions_A.
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
arafa...@gmail.comwrote:
Ok, so you are pre-partitioning the facet field based on initial
Folks, have a basic question regarding solr join, the wiki,
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Join states : -
Fields or other properties of the documents being joined from are not
available for use in processing of the resulting set of to documents
(ie: you can not return fields in the from
46 matches
Mail list logo
