Hi,
Thanks for your answers. I'll give some context: our project uses multiple
3rd party products, Solr is among them. Upgrading versions of 3rd parties
can only take place at specific points in time in the development cycle. At
these points it would be useful to be able to see what changed in
We are still hitting an issue with two cores, each having their own custom
query parser.
The problem in passing {!qparser} is that the custom query parser can
pretty much alter an input query into something that is not desirable for
the delete by query operation.
Is there any way of specifying
Hi Chris,
I think what you are looking for could be solved using the eDismax query
parser.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/The+Extended+DisMax+Query+Parser
1. Your Query Fields ( qf ) would be - urlKeywords^60 title^40 fulltxt^1
2. To check on adultFlag:N you could use
please see below code..
dataConfig
dataSource type=JdbcDataSource
driver=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver
url=jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/mydb01
user=root
password=/
document
entity name=users query=select id,firstname,username from users
Hi William,
I doubt this is a bug.
I tried on Solr 4.5.1. Indexed documents using java -jar post.jar *.xml
This is the query that I fired -
http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/select?q=*:*wt=jsonindent=truerows=0facet=truefacet.limit=1facet.field=namefacet.field=name
And here is the
Hi Guys...
I am new to solandra. How to index the data from database using solandra..
I was configure the Solandra by following this link
https://github.com/tjake/Solandra https://github.com/tjake/Solandra and
i dont know how to index the data using solandra.. Please help me...
--
View
Hi;
This is Solr user mailing list. This page:
https://github.com/tjake/Solandra/wiki/Solandra-Wiki points to a mail list
for Solandra. If you have Solr specific questions you can ask them here.
Thanks;
Furkan KAMACI
2014-02-04 Sathya sathia.blacks...@gmail.com:
Hi Guys...
I am new to
Hi;
I want to detect sentences for Turkish documents to generate better
Higlighting at Solr 4.6.1 What do you prefer to me for that purpose?
Thanks;
Furkan KAMACI
Boundary scanner using Java's break iterator:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters#hl.boundaryScanner
-Original message-
From:Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday 4th February 2014 12:03
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Sentence Detection for
Hi Friends,
I am working in Solr 4.6.0 from last 2 months. i have indexed the data in
solr. Indexing size is 8.3GB which is increasing day by day. While im
searching in this index using java programming with multiple instance( more
than 15 instance), the solr is not responding to the search
I had a configuration where I had overwriteDupes=false. Result: I got
duplicate documents in the index.
When I changed to overwriteDupes=false, the duplicate documents started
overwriting the older documents.
How do I achieve, add if not there, fail if duplicate is found. I though
that
On 4 February 2014 15:28, rachun rachun.c...@gmail.com wrote:
please see below code..
dataConfig
dataSource type=JdbcDataSource
driver=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver
url=jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/mydb01
user=root
password=/
document
Hi Markus;
I've seen it but there is no documentation for it.
2014-02-04 Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.io:
Boundary scanner using Java's break iterator:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters#hl.boundaryScanner
-Original message-
From:Furkan KAMACI
Hi;
Your index size is not much for a 24 GB machine. There should be any other
problem for it. What is your document size and query rate per second? On
the other hand how do you start up your Solr instance (which parameters do
you use)?
Thanks;
Furkan KAMACI
2014-02-04 Sathya
Hi Furkan,
I have index the subjects that containing only 1 to 10 words per subject.
And query rate is minimum 7 seconds for one searching. And i have single
solr instance only.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Searching-Issue-tp4115207p4115234.html
Hi;
Which JVM parameters do you use?
Thanks;
Furkan KAMACI
2014-02-04 Sathya sathia.blacks...@gmail.com:
Hi Furkan,
I have index the subjects that containing only 1 to 10 words per subject.
And query rate is minimum 7 seconds for one searching. And i have single
solr instance only.
Maybe you need a larger Java heap.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Sathya
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2014 6:11 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr Searching Issue
Hi Friends,
I am working in Solr 4.6.0 from last 2 months. i have indexed the data in
solr.
Hi;
Do you want to use token length at boosting? I mean if longer tokens
matched at EdgeNGram filtered field it will have a more boost than the
others?
Thanks;
Furkan KAMACI
2014-02-04 Otis Gospodnetic otis.gospodne...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Can you provide an example, Alexander?
Otis
Solr
Solandra was a prototype, an experiment. It was superceded by a commercial
product - DataStax Enterprise (DSE).
See:
http://www.datastax.com/what-we-offer/products-services/datastax-enterprise
Free support is available on Stack Overflow.
DSE differs from Solandra in that the Lucene index is
Hi Otis and everbody,
I am not sure if Solr works this way, actually I doubt it...
Let's say I look for ABC, and I setup my EdgeNGram to create everything up to
one character: ABC, AB, A
And maybe I have only two docs in the index with ABCD and AB, and they are
also setup with that EdgeNGram
You also said you have multiple instances ( 15) but are they all reading
the same 8Gb data (in which case it must be static or you'd get locking
problems) or is it partitioned/sharded somehow? I'd have the same
questions as the others, query rates, how are your queries distributed over
the
1) Yes, its the JDBC connection URL/URI. You can use a JNDI preconfigured
datasource instead. It's all here
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler
2) It's a mapping: column is the database column and name is your solr
destination field. You only need to specify name when both differ.
DIH
Dear Varun,
Thank you for your replies, I managed to get point 1 2 done, but for the
boost query, I am unable to figure it out. Could you be kind enough to
point me to an example or maybe advice a bit more on that one?
Thanks for your help,
Chris
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Varun Thacker
: The proposed solutions so far (the Apache general updates RSS and the Solr
: general list) are too noisy and not focused enough.
Well, the feed URL previously posted just happened to be for all projects,
there are also per project based feeds if you want more focused RSS...
I think that is silly. We can still offer per shard stats *and* let a user
easily see stats for a collection without requiring they jump hoops or use a
specific monitoring solution where someone else has already jumped hoops for
them.
You don’t have to guess what ops people really want -
+101 for more stats. Was just saying that trying to pre-aggregate them
along multiple dimensions is probably best left out of Solr.
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics
Solr Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Mark Miller
Hi All,
Is there a way to retrieve the documents being imported in a dataimport
request from a EventListener configured to run at onImportEnd?
I need to get the set of values of the field:content of all the documents
imported to perform an enhancement task. Is there a way to retrieve the
I agree that sorting and filtering stats in Solr is not a good idea. There is
certainly some use in aggregation, though. One request to /admin/mbeans
replaces about 50 JMX requests.
Is anybody working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4735?
wunder
On Feb 4, 2014, at 8:13 AM, Otis
Hi all,
I'm on my way to migrating from a proprietary search technology (Endeca) to
SolrCloud 4.6.1.
I'm running 4 servers with 8 cores (2 threads per core with hyperthreading)
and 64 Gb of RAM per server. Each server has 4 shards and each shard is
running in a separate Tomcat instance with a 4
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Joel Cohen joel.co...@bluefly.com wrote:
I'm trying to get the query time down to ~15 msec. Anyone have any tuning
recommendations?
I guess it depends on what the slowest part of the query currently is.
If you are faceting, it's often that.
Also, it's often a
1. We are faceting. I'm not a developer so I'm not quite sure how we're
doing it. How can I measure?
2. I'm not sure how we'd force this kind of document partitioning. I can
see how my shards are partitioned by looking at the clusterstate.json from
Zookeeper, but I don't have a clue on how to get
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Joel Cohen joel.co...@bluefly.com wrote:
1. We are faceting. I'm not a developer so I'm not quite sure how we're
doing it. How can I measure?
Add debugQuery=true to the request and look at the timings of various
components.
2. I'm not sure how we'd force this
Add the debug=true parameter to some test queries and look at the timing
section to see which search components are taking the time. Traditionally,
highlighting for large documents was a top culprit.
Are you returning a lot of data or field values? Sometimes reducing the
amount of data
I plan on adding the debug flag to my queries and collecting that from my
logs. I don't think we're using highlighting. Would anyone be able to tell
from a raw query?
q=%7B%21q.op%3DAND%7D*defType=edismaxqf=color_en%5E2.0+q_vendorColor_en%5E17.0+q_bullet2_en%5E19.0+v
Btw timing for distributed requests are broken at this moment, it doesn't
combine values from requests to shards. I'm working on a patch.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3644
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:j...@basetechnology.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February
: facet.field=prac_spec_heirfacet.field=prac_spec_heir
...
: Thoughts? Seems like a new bug in 4.6 ?
Nope ... it's always been like that. We could concievably dedup, but
that seems like unneccessary cycles in most cases -- if the client asks
for redundent faceting, the client gets
: We found out that:
:
: 1. this happens iff on two cores inside the same container there is a
: query parser defined via defType.
: 2. After removing index files on one of the cores, the delete by query
: works just fine. Right after restarting the container, the same query fails.
I suspect faceting is the issue here. The actual query you have shown
seem to bring back a single document (or a single set of document for
a product):
fq=id:(320403401)
On the other hand, you are asking for 4 field facets:
facet.field=q_virtualCategory_ss
facet.field=q_brand_s
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
Well, the feed URL previously posted just happened to be for all projects,
there are also per project based feeds if you want more focused RSS...
https://projects.apache.org/feeds/rss/solr.xml
I think this is
solr user group -
I'm afraid I may have a scenario where I might need to define a few
thousand fields in Solr. The context here is, this type of data is extremely
granular and unfortunately cannot be grouped into logical groupings or
aggregate fields because there is a need to know
I just would like to thank you for all guru's comments ;)
Now i got it work
Thank you for sharing and helps.
_/|\_
Chun.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Import-data-from-mysql-to-sold-tp4114982p4115431.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive
Hi,
Our SolrCloud with Solr 4.6.0 has two replicas and uses three external
ZooKeeper servers. We have created 20 collections successfully in the last two
weeks. Then, creating new collections started failing since yesterday. New
collections are created with curl like this one:
curl
Hello,
I had a configuration where I had overwriteDupes=false. I added few
duplicate documents. Result: I got duplicate documents in the index.
When I changed to overwriteDupes=true, the duplicate documents started
overwriting the older documents.
Question 1: How do I achieve, [add if not
What will your queries be like? Will it be okay if they are relatively slow?
I mean, how many of those 100 fields will you need to use in a typical (95th
percentile) query?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Mike L.
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2014 10:00 PM
To:
Hi,
Yes all the instances are reading the same 8GB data at a time. The java
search programs( 15 instances) are running in different machines, different
JVM and they accessing the solr server machine(Ubuntu 64 bit). And the solr
Index is not shard. The query rates are too poor(more than 5 seconds
Hey Jack -
Two types of queries:
A) Return all docs that have a match for a particular value from a particular
field (fq=fieldname:value). Because of this I feel Im tied to defining all the
fields. No particular field matters more than another - depends on the search
context so hard to
Interesting about the Zookeeper quorum problem. What if we were to run three
Zookeepers in our primary data center and four in the backup data center. If we
failed over, we wouldn't have a quorum, but we could kill one of the Zookeepers
to restore a quorum, couldn't we? If we did extend the
Thanks - I was unaware of Flume and will investigate it. It looks like it has
specific features for replicating Solr data? Have you or has anyone on the list
used it for this purpose?
Thanks again,
Darrel
-Original Message-
From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
Sent:
You could probably manage the schema by using dynamic fields. Also,
enable lazy loading to avoid loading the values of the fields you do
not care about.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
- Time is the
On 2/4/2014 9:49 PM, Sathya wrote:
Yes all the instances are reading the same 8GB data at a time. The java
search programs( 15 instances) are running in different machines, different
JVM and they accessing the solr server machine(Ubuntu 64 bit). And the solr
Index is not shard. The query rates
On 2/4/2014 10:14 PM, Darrell Burgan wrote:
Interesting about the Zookeeper quorum problem. What if we were to run three
Zookeepers in our primary data center and four in the backup data center. If
we failed over, we wouldn't have a quorum, but we could kill one of the
Zookeepers to restore
On 2/4/2014 8:00 PM, Mike L. wrote:
I'm just wondering here if there is any defined limit to how many fields can
be created within a schema? I'm sure the configuration maintenance of a
schema like this would be a nightmare, but would like to know if its at all
possible in the first place
Hi Shawn,
I am running single instance solr and the JVM heap space is minimum 6.3gb
and maximum 24.31gb. Nothing is running to complete the 24gb except tomcat
server. I have only 2 copyField entries only.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Shawn Heisey-4 [via Lucene]
Hi Chris,
An example for point 3 could be -
boost=recip(field(domainRank),0.1,1,1)
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#recip
recip(x,m,a,b) implementing a/(m*x+b). m,a,b are constants, x is any
numeric field or arbitrarily complex function.
So with these values when domainRank is 1 it
54 matches
Mail list logo
