Didn't you ask exactly this question two weeks ago and got some
replies that you need to do more domain analysis? Did you have any
progress since and do you have more precise Solr-specific questions?
Regards,
Alex.
P.s. http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/a/alberteins133991.html
Personal
Oh, somehow missed that in your original e-mail. How do you run the
checkindex? Do you pass the -fix option? [1]
You may want to try luke [2] to open index without opening the IndexReader
and run the Tools-Check Index tool from the luke.
[1] http://java.dzone.com/news/lucene-and-solrs-checkindex
my_index(one core):
id,dealer,productName,amount,region
1,A1,iphone4,400,east
2,A1,iphone4s,450,east
3,A2,iphone5s,550,east
..
4,A1,iphone4,400,west
5,A1,iphone4s,450,west
6,A3,iphone5s,550,west
..
-I'd like to get which dealer sale the 'iphone' both in the 'east' and
'west'
pl/sql
Thank you.
I tried Luke with IndexReader disabled, however it seems the index is
compeletely broken, as it complains ERROR: java.lang.Exception: there is
no valid Lucene index in this directory.
Sounds like I am out of luck, is it so?
--
View this message in context:
1. Luke: if you leave the IndexReader on, does the index even open? Can you
access the CheckIndex?
2. The command line CheckIndex: what does the CheckIndex -fix do?
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:54 AM, zqzuk ziqizh...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
Thank you.
I tried Luke with IndexReader disabled,
hi all,
I have a test for document migrate. I followed this url:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Collections+API#CollectionsAPI-api12Migratedocumentstoanothercollection
I am trying on solr- 4.6.1. I have two collection (collection1 and
collection2) and two shards. my collection1
I searched a way to index only the content/text part of a PDF (without all the
other fields Tika creates) and I found the solution with the uprefix =
ignored_ and dynamicField name=ignored_* type=ignored multiValued=true
indexed=false stored=false /.
The problem is, that uprefix works on
1. No, if IndexReader is on I get the same error message from checkindex
2. It doesnt do any thing but giving that error message I posted before then
quit. The full print of the error trace is:
Opening index @ E:\...\zookeeper\solr\collec
tion1\data\index
ERROR: could not read any segments
Hello,
I have the following issue and need help:
One HTML file has different parts for different countries.
For example:
!-- Country: FR, BE ---
Address for France and Benelux
!-- Country End --
!-- Country: CH --
Address for Switzerland
!-- Country End --
Depending on a
On 25 March 2014 15:59, Michael Clivot cli...@netmedia.de wrote:
Hello,
I have the following issue and need help:
One HTML file has different parts for different countries.
For example:
!-- Country: FR, BE ---
Address for France and Benelux
!-- Country End --
!-- Country: CH
Migrate is new in Solr 4.7.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
25. mars 2014 kl. 10:51 skrev Cihat güzel c.guzel@gmail.com:
hi all,
I have a test for document migrate. I followed this url:
Hi;
I think that we should add which version includes which parameters at
Collections API wiki page. A new 'migrate' collection API to split all
documents with a route key into another collection is introduced with Solr
4.7.0
Thanks;
Furkan KAMACI
2014-03-25 11:51 GMT+02:00 Cihat güzel
Hi,
Seems you try to reindex from one server to the other.
Be aware that it could be easier for you to simply copy the whole index folder
over to your 4.6.1 server and start Solr as it will be able to read your 3.x
index. This is unless you also want to do major upgrades of your schema or
I think that we should add which version includes which parameters at
Collections API wiki page. A new 'migrate' collection API to split all
documents with a route key into another collection is introduced with Solr
4.7.0
Should not be necessary, since the top of every Confluence page reads
There is no Solr feature that would break up your HTML file - you will have
to do that yourself, either before you send the file to Solr or by
developing a custom update processor that extracts the sections and directs
each to a specific field for the language. The former is probably easier
If using stopwords with edismax, please make sure that ALL fields referred in
qf have stopwords defined in the fieldType and also that the stopword
dictionary is the SAME for all these. This way you will not encounter the
infamous edismax+stopwords bug mentioned in
Hi,
First of all, the wiki page you refer to is *not* the official ref-guide. The
official one can be found here
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Apache+Solr+Reference+Guide
The wiki you found is a community-edited wiki, and may talk about ideas or
patches.
The autentication
Hi Ares,
How about using field collapsing? https://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing
q=+region:(east OR west) +productName:iPhone
group=true
group.field=dealer
If the number of distinct groups is high, CollapsingQueryParser could be used
too.
right. If you have cfs files in the index directory, there is a thread
discussing the method of regenerating the segment files:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/39744
backup before doing changes!
source on SO:
Thanks for Solr! It's a great product. I've been hanging out in
#lucene-dev for a while but I thought I'd join the mailing list.
ezmlm seems to pick up an alternate email address of mine in the
Return-Path header so I tried to override the default subscription
address by emailing
Gora! It works now!
You are amazing! thank you so much!
I dropped the atom: from the xpath and everything is working.
I did have a typo that might have been causing issues too.
thanks again!
--
View this message in context:
Hello,
I have the following problem to resolve using solr :
search WITH or WITHOUT accents (selection at runtime) + highlights
how can i configure the schema to realize this ?
for example:
inputString aaa près bbb pres
A) accent sensitive
1.search for *près* highlight =aaa
This night the problem occurred again and I have more data. This time this
problem happened only in one solr server and it successfully recovered.
solr which had all the leaders:
[06:38:58.205 - 06:38:58.222] Stopping recovery for
zkNodeName=core_node2core=** *- for all collections*
Hi Philip,
Comments inline:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Philip Durbin
philip_dur...@harvard.edu wrote:
I'm new to Solr and am exploring the idea of creating shards on the
fly. Once the shards have been created and populated, I am hoping to
use the shards query parameter to combine
Bump
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Software Dev static.void@gmail.com wrote:
In 3.5.0 we have the following.
fieldType name=autocomplete class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer type=index
tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/
filter
I see that by default in SolrCloud that my collections are
replicating. Should this be disabled in SolrCloud as this is already
handled by it?
From the documentation:
The Replication screen shows you the current replication state for
the named core you have specified. In Solr, replication is for
Hi all!
Now I have a default search field, defined as
field name=Text type=text indexed=true stored=true /
...
fieldType name=text class=solr.TextField
autoGeneratePhraseQueries=true
analyzer type=index
tokenizer class=solr.ClassicTokenizerFactory/
filter
On 3/25/2014 10:42 AM, Software Dev wrote:
I see that by default in SolrCloud that my collections are
replicating. Should this be disabled in SolrCloud as this is already
handled by it?
From the documentation:
The Replication screen shows you the current replication state for
the named core
Thank you very much for responding Mr. Høydahl. I removed the recursion
which eliminated the stack overflow exception. However, I still
encountering my main problem with the docs not getting indexed in solr 4.x
as I mentioned in my original email. The reason I am reindexing is that
with solr 4.x
I'm new to Solr and am exploring the idea of creating shards on the
fly. Once the shards have been created and populated, I am hoping to
use the shards query parameter to combine results from multiple
shards into a single results set.
By following the Testing Index Sharding on Two Local Servers
Hello Mikhail,
Thanks for the suggestions. It took some time to get to this -
1. FieldsCollapsing cannot be done on Multivalue fields -
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing
2. Join acts on documents, how can I use it to join multi-value fields in
the same document?
3. Block-join
No, don't disable replication!
The way shards ordinarily keep up with updates is by sending every document
to each member of the shard. However, if a shard goes offline for a period
of time and comes back, replication is used to catch up that shard. So
you really need it on.
If you created your
Thanks for the reply. Ill make sure NOT to disable it.
Can anyone else chime in? Thanks
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Software Dev
static.void@gmail.com wrote:
Shawn,
Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. After consulting the
above document I *think* that the problem may be too large of a heap
and which may be affecting GC
What kind of load are the machines under when this happens? A lot of
writes? A lot of http connections?
Do your zookeeper logs mention anything about losing clients?
Have you tried turning on GC logging or profiling GC?
Have you tried running with a smaller max heap size, or
setting
hi friends,
when i search for A and B it gives me result for A , B , i am not sure
why?
Please guide how can i exact match when it is within phrase/quotes.
--
Thanks and kind Regards,
Abhishek jain
What does your field type analyzer look like?
I suspect that you have a stop filter which cause and to be removed.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: abhishek jain
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 1:29 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: AND not as a boolean operator
One other question. If I optimize a collection on one node, does this
get replicated to all others when finished?
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Software Dev
static.void@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the reply. Ill make sure NOT to disable it.
Iam also seeing the following in the log. Is it really commiting ??? Now I
am totally confused about how solr 4.x indexes. My relavant update config
is as shown below
updateHandler class=solr.DirectUpdateHandler2
maxPendingDeletes1/maxPendingDeletes
autoCommit
maxDocs100/maxDocs
Ehh.. found out the hard way. I optimized the collection on 1 machine
and when it was completed it replicated to the others and took my
cluster down. Shitty
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Software Dev
static.void@gmail.com wrote:
One other question. If I optimize a collection on one node,
On 3/25/2014 11:59 AM, Software Dev wrote:
Ehh.. found out the hard way. I optimized the collection on 1 machine
and when it was completed it replicated to the others and took my
cluster down. Shitty
It doesn't get replicated -- each core in the collection will be
optimized. In older
So its generally a bad idea to optimize I gather?
- In older versions it might have done them all at once, but I believe
that newer versions only do one core at a time.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 3/25/2014 11:59 AM, Software Dev wrote:
Ehh..
In older versions it might have done them all at once, but I believe
that newer versions only do one core at a time.
It looks like it did it all at once and I'm on the latest (4.7)
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Software Dev
static.void@gmail.com wrote:
So its generally a bad idea to
Ravi,
It looks like you are re-indexing data by pulling data from your solr server
and then indexing it back to the same server. I can think of many things
that could go wrong with this setup. For example are all your fields stored?
Since you are iterating through all documents on the solr server
Yes, it is generally a bad idea to optimize.
The system continually does merges as needed. You generally do not need to
force a full merge.
wunder
On Mar 25, 2014, at 11:27 AM, Software Dev static.void@gmail.com wrote:
So its generally a bad idea to optimize I gather?
- In older
I'm new to Solr and I'm looking for a document level security filter
solution. Anonymous users searching my application should be able to
find public data. Logged in users should be able to find public data
and private data they have access to.
Earlier today I wrote about shards as a possible
Depending on requirements, another option for simple security is to
store the security info in the index and utilize a join. This really
only works when you have a single shard since joins aren't
distributed.
# the documents, with permissions
id:doc1, perms:public,...
id:doc2, perms:group1
I just tried even reading from one core A and indexed it into core B and
the same issue still persists.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Lan dung@gmail.com wrote:
Ravi,
It looks like you are re-indexing data by pulling data from your solr
server
and then indexing it back to the same
Sorry Guys, really apologize for wasting your time...bone headed coding on
my part. Did not set the rows and start to correct values for proper
pagination so it was getting the same 10 docs every single time.
Thanks
Ravi Kiran Bhaskar
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Ravi Solr
Same problem here:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-x-EdgeNGramFilterFactory-and-highlighting-td4114748.html
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Software Dev static.void@gmail.com wrote:
Bump
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Software Dev static.void@gmail.com
wrote:
In 3.5.0
On Mar 25, 2014 10:37 PM, ku3ia dem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
Now I have a default search field, defined as
field name=Text type=text indexed=true stored=true /
...
fieldType name=text class=solr.TextField
autoGeneratePhraseQueries=true
analyzer type=index
tokenizer
Hi
Is it possible to set up the data import handler so that it keeps track of
the last imported time in Zulu time and not local time ?
Its not very clear from the documentation how to do it or if it is even
possible to do it.
Ref:
In reference to my prior thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201403.mbox/%3ccac-cpvrzbhizomcdhkrhygqizguerntkwtkxwwx3j1rqcxe...@mail.gmail.com%3E
I followed the advice to set unmap=false on my indexes with promising
results. Without performing any index updates I
I'm having a very similar issue to this currently on 4.6.0 (large
java.lang.ref.Finalizer usage, many open file handles to long gone files) --
were you able to make any progress diagnosing this issue?
--
View this message in context:
What are the main contributing factors for Solr Cloud generating a lot
of disk IO?
A lot of reads? Writes? Insufficient RAM?
I would think if there was enough disk cache available for the whole
index there would be little to no disk IO.
How big is you index? #documents, #size?
Thanks,
Susheel
-Original Message-
From: cmd.ares [mailto:cmd.a...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 4:50 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: intersect query
my_index(one core):
id,dealer,productName,amount,region
(2014/03/26 2:29), abhishek jain wrote:
hi friends,
when i search for A and B it gives me result for A , B , i am not sure
why?
Please guide how can i exact match when it is within phrase/quotes.
Generally speaking (w/ LuceneQParser), if you want phrase match results,
use quotes, i.e. q=A B.
Better to user '+A +B' rather than AND/OR, see:
http://searchhub.org/2011/12/28/why-not-and-or-and-not/
François
On Mar 25, 2014, at 10:21 PM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote:
(2014/03/26 2:29), abhishek jain wrote:
hi friends,
when i search for A and B it gives me result
On 26 March 2014 02:44, Kiran J kiranjuni...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Is it possible to set up the data import handler so that it keeps track of
the last imported time in Zulu time and not local time ?
[...]
Start your JVM with the desired timezone, e.g.,
java -Duser.timezone=UTC -jar start.jar
q_score=cancer
sort: rint(product(sum($p_score,$s_score,$q_score),100)) desc,s_query asc
,tie: 1,q1: $q,q_score: query({!dismax qf=\user_query_edge^1
user_query^0.5 user_query_fuzzy\ v=$q1}),
I also tried q1=cancer... It does not work unless I set v='cancer'
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:12 PM, William Bell
61 matches
Mail list logo
