Except if I missed it, nobody yet pointed to
http://solr-vs-elasticsearch.com/
which seems to be fairly up-to-date.
As for performance, I would expect that it is very hard to find one of
the two technologies to be generally ahead. Except for plain blunders
that may be lurking in the code, I
This all depends on how the tokenizers take your URLs apart. To quickly
see what ended up in the index, go to a core in the UI, select Schema
Browser, select the field containing your URLs, click on Load Term Info.
In your case, for the field holding the URL you could try to switch to a
That resource is rather superficial. I wouldn't make big decision based on it.
As to performance, ElasticSearch stores the full submitted content as
_source field. That allows it some extra tricks (like fake-nested
documents), but also has a storage price. You can disable the _source
field, but
Hi,
I am building a new search component and it runs after QueryComponent.
What I want to do is set params like start, rows, query and so on at new
search component.
I could set/get query by using
setQueryString()
On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 08:31 +0200, Harald Kirsch wrote:
As for performance, I would expect that it is very hard to find one of
the two technologies to be generally ahead. Except for plain blunders
that may be lurking in the code, I would think the inner loops, the
stuff that really burns
Dear SOLR user list
We are hiring for Search Platform Business Consultant on contract in London.
Working for leading global consulting firm from London offices on London / UK
major retail clients.
I wondered if you may find of interest or be able to recommend in the group.
Hi Shalin,
Thanks for the response.. :)
In this case, is there any other way to update the document make it the
retrieval work?
I tried the below code and with this I am getting the version conflict
exception. How to avoid this and make it work?
I think you are sending the entire document returned by Solr again for an
atomic update. The reason why it fails with a version conflict error
because the document you are sending has a _version_ field.
Just send the unique key and the field that you want to update. The rest of
the fields aren't
Very interested in what you find out with your benchmarking, and whether it
bears out what I've experienced.
Does anyone know when 4.10 is likely to be released?
I'm benchmarking this right now so I'll share some numbers soon.
--
View this message in context:
Any one find any solution for this probleme ?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Auto-suggest-with-adding-accents-tp4150379p4150972.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Use ModifiableParams
SolrParams params = rb.req.getParams();
ModifiableSolrParams modifableSolrParams = new
ModifiableSolrParams(params);
modifableSolrParams.set(ParamName, paramValue);
rb.req.setParams(modifableSolrParams)
On 4 August 2014
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
arafa...@gmail.com wrote:
That resource is rather superficial. I wouldn't make big decision based on it.
Agree. It's also somewhat biased given the environment in which it
grew. ES advocates were all over stuff like that, but Solr advocates
And neither project supports the Lucene faceting module, correct?
And the ES web site says: WARNING: Facets are deprecated and will be
removed in a future release. You are encouraged to migrate to aggregations
instead.
That makes it more of an apples/oranges comparison.
-- Jack Krupansky
Hello,
I have an index which contain genève
I need to do this query q=gene and get in auto complete this result :
genève (e - è)
I'm using StandardTokenizerFactory for field and SpellCheckComponent for
searchCompenent.
All solutions are welcome,
Thanks,
Best regards,
Anass BENJELLOUN
--
You need to use this filter in your analysis chain:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory
Michael Della Bitta
Applications Developer
o: +1 646 532 3062
appinions inc.
“The Science of Influence Marketing”
18 East 41st Street
New York, NY
hello you didnt enderstand well my probleme,
i give exemple: i have document contain genève with accent
when i do q=gene -- autoSuggest geneve because of
ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory preserveOriginal=true
when i do q=genè -- autoSuggest genève
but what i need to is:
q=gene without accent and get
How are you implementing autosuggest? I'm assuming you're querying an
indexed field and getting a stored value back. But there are a wide variety
of ways of doing it.
Michael Della Bitta
Applications Developer
o: +1 646 532 3062
appinions inc.
“The Science of Influence Marketing”
18 East
here is my configuration:
searchComponent class=solr.SpellCheckComponent name=suggests
lst name=spellchecker
str name=namesuggestDic/str
str name=classnameorg.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.Suggester/str
str
Hi Joel,
You're sort of describing the classic replication scenario, which you can
get started on by reading this: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication
Although I believe this is handled in the reference guide, too.
Generally speaking, the sorts of issues you mention are general issues
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Joel Cohen jco...@grubhub.com wrote:
The only thing so far that I see as a hurdle here is the data set size vs.
heap size. If the index grows too large, then we have to increase the heap
size, which could lead to longer GC times. Servers could pop in and out of
I just finished adding support for persisted (backed as I call them)
bloom-filters in Guava Bloom Filter. Implemented one kind of persisted
bloom-filter that works on memory mapped files.
I have changed our Solr code so that it uses such a enhanced Guava Bloom
Filter. Making sure it is kept up
if you have another configuration to can solve this problem please share it,
thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Auto-Complete-tp4150987p4151002.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I am trying to build a development environment with 3 solr nodes and 1
zookeeper node using Vagrant.
I am using example/collection1 with 2 shards, standard tutorial.
Right now, this is my Vagrantfile:
VAGRANTFILE_API_VERSION = 2
Vagrant.configure(VAGRANTFILE_API_VERSION) do |config|
To do a substring search, I have added a new fieldType - Text with
NgramFilter.
It works fine perfectly but downside is this problem
Example
name = ['Apple','Samy','And','a']
When I do a search name:a, then all the above items gets pulled up. Even
when search changes to App. All the above items
Don't use N-grams at query time.
-Original message-
From:prem1980 prem1...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday 4th August 2014 17:47
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr substring search yields all indexed results
To do a substring search, I have added a new fieldType - Text with
Thanks for the input. For how long will the 'old style' of replication be
supported? Is it set to go away in Solr 5? I don't want to be stuck on
using an old version because we designed our application the wrong way.
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Michael Della Bitta
It will always be supported under the current architecture as
SolrCloud uses master/slave style replication to bring replicas back
in-sync with leaders if a replica is too far out of date (currently,
too far 100 missed updates). So if it fits your architecture better,
then use it!
On Mon, Aug 4,
Hi Guys
Thanks for the replies. I've had a look at the WordDelimiterFilterFactory
and the Term Info for the url field. It seems that all the terms exist and
I now understand that each url is being broken up using the delimiters
specified. But I think I'm still missing something.
Am I correct
The standard tokenizer treats underscore as a valid token character, not a
delimiter.
The word delimiter filter will treat underscore as a delimiter though.
Make sure your query-time WDF does not have preserveOriginal=1 - but the
index-time WDF should have preserveOriginal=1. Otherwise, the
Looking at this line in the code:
// This enusres that reRankDocs = docs needed to satisfy the result set.
reRankDocs = Math.max(start+rows, reRankDocs);
This looks like it would cause skips and duplicates while paging through
the results, since if you exceed the reRankDocs parameter and keep
Hello everyone, this is my first time posting a question, so forgive me if
i'm missing something.
This is my problem:
I have a schema.xml that has the following latLong information
The dynamicField generates 2 dynamic fields that have the lat and the long
(latLong_0_coordinate and
Are the latLong_0_coordinate and latLong_1_coordinate fields populated using
copyField? If so, this sounds like it could be
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3502.
-Michael
-Original Message-
From: Franco Giacosa [mailto:fgiac...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 9:05
No, they are not declarad explicitly.
This is how they are created:
field name=latLong type=location indexed=true stored=true/
dynamicField name=*_coordinate type=tdouble indexed=true
stored=false/
fieldType name=location class=solr.LatLonType
subFieldSuffix=_coordinate/
2014-08-04 22:28
On 7/30/14, 10:47 AM, Eugene wrote:
Hello, fellow Solr and Lucene users and developers!
In our project we receive text from users in different languages. We
detect language automatically and use Google Translate APIs a lot (so
having arbitrary number of languages in our system doesn't
Hmmm, I jus tried this with a 4.x build and I can update the document
multiple times without a problem. I just indexed the standard exampledocs
and then updated a doc like this (vidcard.xml was the base):
add
doc
field name=idEN7800GTX/2DHTV/256M/field
field name=manu_id_s update=seteoe
Hi Solr Experts,
Request you to please help me in fixing the below facets problem. Thanks in
advance. Also pls let me know if you do not understand any part of my
explanation below.
How do I facet on more than two categories (let’s say ‘project’ and ‘type’
as discussed below) at the same time
If I understand correctly, you are looking for multi-select faceting:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#Multi-Select_Faceting_and_LocalParams
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Smitha Rajiv smitharaji...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Solr Experts,
Request you to please help me in fixing
37 matches
Mail list logo
