Hi,
I am trying to integrate DictionaryAnnotator of UIMA to Solr 4.9.0 to find
gene names from a dictionary. So I made the following changes.
1. I Modified OverridingParamsExtServicesAE.xml file as follow:
:
...
...
:
2. Modified the sections for adding DictionaryAnnotator
node:
Hi,
I am trying to integrate UIMA and Solr. I'm following the guide here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/UIMA+Integration
I'm also already using DIH to import from XML files.
Here is what I've added to solrconfig.xml:
libraries:
UpdateRequestProcessorChain:
I'm looking at the Solr Reference Guide about Solr on HDFS, and it's
bringing up a couple of quick questions for me. I guess I got spoiled by
MMapDirectory and how magically it worked!
1. What is the minimum number of configuration parameters that enables HDFS
block caching? It seems like I need t
Ralph good catch. Thanks for the feedback!
We should try without highlighting when a query with highlighting
fails. In general we want to keep the requirements to a minimum. Right
now it looks like highlighting is a requirement, but that shouldn't be
the case. Highlighting should only be a value-a
What are the dependencies here in terms of solr config? Looks like it's
dependent on highlighting at a minimum?
I tried the example url and got a 500 with this stack trace once I
inspected the response of the generated URI:
java.lang.NullPointerException at
org.apache.solr.handler.component.High
Cool Doug! I look forward to digging into this.
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Doug Turnbull <
dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> Greetings from the OpenSource Connecti
Turns out there are in fact documents for the same group in different
shards which must be causing this problem. It looks like we have a slight
flaw in how we were trying to use the composite id routing.
Thanks for putting me down the right path.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Shumway
The Co-location section of this document
http://searchhub.org/2013/06/13/solr-cloud-document-routing/ might be of
interest to you. It mentions the need for using Solr Cloud routing to group
documents in the same core so that grouping can work properly.
--Andrew Shumway
-Original Message
Thanks Jim.
We've been using the composite id approach where we put group value as the
leading portion of the id (i.e. groupValue!documentid), so I was expecting
all of the documents for a given group to be in the same shard, but at
least this gives me something to look into. I'm still suspicious
Greetings from the OpenSource Connections Team!
We're happy to announce we've taken core sandbox of our search relevancy
product Quepid and open sourced it as "Splainer" (http://splainer.io).
Splainer is a search sandbox that explains search results in a human
readable form as you work. By being a
Hi Bryan,
This is a known limitations of the grouping.
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing#RequestParameters
group.ngroups:
*WARNING: If this parameter is set to true on a sharded environment, all
the documents that belong to the same group have to be located in the same
shard, otherwis
Solr does support date mathematics in filters / queries . So your
timestamps intervals can be dynamic ..
On 22 August 2014 05:51, deniz wrote:
> umeshprasad wrote
> > Grouping supports group by queries.
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Result+Grouping
> >
> > However y
Great!! Worked for me too. Thanks a lot
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Null-pointer-exception-in-spell-checker-at-addchecker-method-tp4105489p4154403.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
HI Tomer,
I guess you are looking for a different fragment builder.
There is one called ScoreOrderFragmentsBuilder which probably is not exact what
you need, but at least it orders the snippets by a score. That should work for
you
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters#hl.fragmentsB
14 matches
Mail list logo