Hello,
It seems Solr is caching when facting even with fq={!cache=false}*:* specified.
This is what I am doing on Solr 4.10.0 on jre 1.7.0_51.
Query 1) No cache in filterCache as expected
http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/select?q=*:*rows=0fq={!cache=false}*:*
Hi,
I'm using Solr 4.10.1 with the new solr.xml format (auto-discovered
cores). I'm trying to set a property that I can reference in
solrconfig.xml files of all cores.
I know I can use JVM system properties or add the property to each
core's core.properties file. Is there another
Hi,
I am using Nutch 1.9 and Solr 4.6 to index a web application with approximately
100 distinct URL and contents.
Nutch is used to fetch the urls, links and the crawl the entire web application
to extract all the content for all pages, and send the content to Solr.
The problem that I have
First, I want to thank you for your response!
can you provide more information about the suggested hardlink solution?
What are the advantages and disadvantages using it?
can you provide an example please?
meanwhile try to read about it and test it myself asap.
thanks!
--
View this
Okay, I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6728
Erick Erickson wrote on 11/06/2014 08:00 PM:
Yeah, please create a JIRA. There are a couple of umbrella JIRAs that
you might want to link it to
I'm not sure it quite fits in either, if not just let it hang out there bear:
In Korea, only few people can read English well. Thus, it is difficult to
use solr. But I want solr to spread out . So I would like to translate solr
wiki to Korean. Is there any good ways to translate it?
I want to show cumulative graph from banana framework(SiLK).
https://docs.lucidworks.com/display/SiLK/Banana
There is no cumulative graph so I want to select count(*) from solr
collection like dummy field.
So then I am going to sum the field(count(*)) and show histogram graph.
Do you have idea?
Hi, folks!
We are using parent/child architecture in our project and sometimes when
using child transformer ([child]) there are an exception:
Parent query yields document which is not matched by parents filter,
docID=...
Examples of query are:
I think I found the problem. The definition of the suggester component
has a field option which references the field that the suggester uses
to generate suggestions. Changing this to the field using the
DictionaryCompundWordTokenFilterFactory also suggests word parts.
Am 11.11.2014 08:52 schrieb
Like in this article
(http://www.andornot.com/blog/post/Advanced-autocomplete-with-Solr-Ngrams-and-Twitters-typeaheadjs.aspx),
I am using multiple fields to generate different options for an
autosuggest functionality:
- First, the whole field (top priority)
- Then, the whole field as
Hi Moumita,
Once, I used https://code.google.com/p/boilerpipe/ to remove common
header/footers etc.
Ahmet
On Tuesday, November 11, 2014 10:41 AM, Moumita Dhar01
moumita_dha...@infosys.com wrote:
Hi,
I am using Nutch 1.9 and Solr 4.6 to index a web application with approximately
100
Hi Anurag,
How can I find median function ? I use a lot that.
2014-11-09 20:39 GMT+02:00 Anurag Sharma anura...@gmail.com:
Can a function query(http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery) serves your
use case
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Talat Uyarer ta...@uyarer.com wrote:
I searched
On 11/11/2014 1:45 AM, elmerfudd wrote:
First, I want to thank you for your response!
can you provide more information about the suggested hardlink solution?
What are the advantages and disadvantages using it?
can you provide an example please?
meanwhile try to read about it and test
Hi Jeon Woosung,
The Solr community wiki is no longer the official Solr documentation location.
The Solr Reference Guide is where Solr documentation is now maintained:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Apache+Solr+Reference+Guide.
I’m not sure what you mean when you ask “Is
On 11/11/2014 1:22 AM, Mohsin Beg Beg wrote:
It seems Solr is caching when facting even with fq={!cache=false}*:*
specified. This is what I am doing on Solr 4.10.0 on jre 1.7.0_51.
Query 1) No cache in filterCache as expected
Hi Eric, Michael,
thank you both for your comments.
2014-11-11 5:05 GMT+01:00 Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com:
bq: - the documents are organized in shards according to date (integer)
and
language (a possibly extensible discrete set)
bq: - the indexes are disjunct
OK, I'm having a
Yeah, Erick confused me a bit too, but I think what he's talking about
takes for granted that you'd have your various indexes directly set up
as individual collections.
If instead you're considering one big collection, or a few collections
based on aggregations of your individual indexes,
Hm. So I found that one can update stored fields with atomic update
operation, however according to
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19058795/it-is-possible-to-update-uniquekey-in-solr-4
this will not work for uniqueKey. So I guess with compositeId router I am
out of luck.
I have been also
Well, the difference that you're faceting with method=enum, which uses
the filterCache (I think, it's been a while).
I admit I'm a little surprised that when I tried faceting with the
inStock field in the standard distro I got 3 entries when there are
only two values but I'm willing to let that
bq: So I guess with compositeId router I am out of luck.
No, not at all. Atomic updates are exactly about updating
a doc and NOT changing the id. A different uniqueKey is
a different doc by definition.
So you can easily use atomic updates with composite IDs
since you are changing a field of an
Thanks for your response.. It's indeed a good idea..I will try that out..
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-generate-calculate-facet-counts-for-external-fields-tp4168653p4168790.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
This issue should be resolved in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6323.
This is committed in trunk, 5x, 4x, and 4_10, but this did not make it into
4.10.2. If you take the version in the 4_10 branch you should be good to
go. If a version 4.10.3 is cut, this will be included.
Joel
Shawn, then how to skip filterCache for facet.method=enum ?
Wiki says fq={!cache=false}*:* is ok, no?
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCaching#filterCache
-Mohsin
- Original Message -
From: erickerick...@gmail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Mohsin Beg Beg mohsin@oracle.com wrote:
Wiki says fq={!cache=false}*:* is ok, no?
That's for the filtering... not for the faceting.
then how to skip filterCache for facet.method=enum ?
Specify a high minDF (the min docfreq or number of documents that
need
Just verified that fuzzy queries work in trunk with this test:
params = new ModifiableSolrParams();
params.add(rq, {!rerank reRankQuery=$rqq reRankDocs=6});
params.add(q, term_s:~1 AND test_ti:[0 TO 2000]);
params.add(rqq, id:1^10 id:2^20 id:3^30 id:4^40 id:5^50 id:6^60);
I am using the below code to do partial update (in SOLR 4.2)
partialUpdate = new HashMapString, Object();
partialUpdate.put(set,Object);
doc.setField(description, partialUpdate);
server.add(docs);
server.commit();
I am seeing the below description value with {set =...}, Any idea why this
is
Probably sum and division can be applied to get the median.
If you are using ver above 5,
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev//trunk/solr/contrib/analytics/src/java/org/apache/solr/analytics/statistics/MedianStatsCollector.java
can be used directly
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Talat
The usual approach is to use copyField to copy multiple fields to a
single field.
I posted a solution using an UpdateRequestProcessor to merge fields, but
with different analyzers, here:
https://blog.safaribooksonline.com/2014/04/15/search-suggestions-with-solr-2/
My latest approach is
Hi All,
I am seeing interesting behavior on the replicas , I have a single
shard and 6 replicas and on SolrCloud 4.10.1 . I only have a small
number of documents ~375 that are replicated across the six replicas .
The interesting thing is that the same document has a different id in
each one of
“uuid” isn’t an out of the box field type that I’m familiar with.
Generally, I’d stick with the out of the box advice of the schema.xml file,
which includes things like….
!-- Only remove the id field if you have a very good reason to. While not
strictly
required, it is highly
Looking a little deeper, I did find this about UUIDField
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_9_0/solr-core/org/apache/solr/schema/UUIDField.html
NOTE: Configuring a UUIDField instance with a default value of NEW is not
advisable for most users when using SolrCloud (and not possible if the UUID
The first thing I'd try is to stop explicitly _telling_ solr to use
the enum method by
omitting the facet.method=enum from your URL ;)...
I'm guessing that the field in question has very few unique values, so
you probably
need to do what Yonik suggests
Erick
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 1:30 PM,
Sorry didn't get what you are trying to achieve and the issue.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:20 AM, bbarani bbar...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using the below code to do partial update (in SOLR 4.2)
partialUpdate = new HashMapString, Object();
partialUpdate.put(set,Object);
Hi Bbarani,
Partial update solrJ example can be found in :
http://find.searchhub.org/document/5b1187abfcfad33f
Ahmet
On Tuesday, November 11, 2014 8:51 PM, bbarani bbar...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using the below code to do partial update (in SOLR 4.2)
partialUpdate = new HashMapString,
I am trying to index json data present under blob data type in data base.
JSON stored in database as {a:1,b:2,c:3}.
I want to Search based on fields later like fq= a:1.
The fields a,b,c are dynamic and can be anything based on data posted by
users.
What is the correct way to index data based on
35 matches
Mail list logo
