Hi,
I know that they mismatch. I'm guessing that there is something inside Tika
that is setting up. Or alternatively it's trying to guess the format and
needs to unzip. I don't really understand why the error says a constant is
not available.
Any ideas?
- Joel
On 18 December 2014 at 17:01,
I'm trying to implement specifying queries - we have some results and need to
search over them.
But query, I constructed, returns some strange results.
q=(text:(specific) OR title:(specific)) AND (text:(first long query) OR
title:(first long query))
This query returns something, which contains
Hello,
I suppose it's answered at
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/converting-to-parent-child-block-indexing-td4174835.html
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Rajesh rajesh.panneersel...@aspiresys.com
wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to index documents using SolrJ. I'm getting duplicate documents
Hi, I am using solr 4.9 for searching over 90 million+ documents. My Solr is
running on tomcat server and I am querying Solr from an application. I
have a problem with long-running queries against Solr. Although I have set
timeAllowed to 4ms, but it seems that solr still running this query
Hello Nick,
First of all, if you don't understand the results ask Solr to explain by
debugQuery=true. The output is raally verbose and puzzling. That is.
Then, I guess you tries to implement something like 'refinement', filtering
aka faceted navigation. Try to supply the filtering clause via
Hello,
Note, that timeout is checked only during the search. But for example, it
isn't checked during facet counting. Check debugQuery=true output, to
understand how the processing time is distributed across components.
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Vishnu Mishra vdil...@gmail.com wrote:
I am out of the office until 12/26/2014.
I'll be out of the office starting Friday, Dec 19, until Friday, Dec 26.
Please contact Biju Kumar or Khurram Arshad for any pressing JAS Team
related items.
Note: This is an automated response to your message Re: Indexing with
SolrJ sent on
I have the next settings in my solrconfig.xml:
filterCache class=solr.FastLRUCache
size=512000
initialSize=64000
autowarmCount=32000/
queryResultCache class=solr.LRUCache
size=256000
initialSize=32000
Hi,
based on this example:
http://www.cominvent.com/2012/01/25/super-flexible-autocomplete-with-solr/
I have earlier successfully implemented highlight of terms in
(Edge)NGram-analyzed fields.
In a new project, however, with Solr 4.10.2 it does not work.
In the Solr admin analysis page I see
Those are huge cache sizes. My guess is that the searchExecutor thread is
spending too much time doing warming. Garbage collection may also be a
factor as other people pointed out.
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:50 PM, heaven aheave...@gmail.com wrote:
I have the next settings in my solrconfig.xml:
Also note SOLR-5986 which will help in such cases when queries are stuck
iterating through terms. This will be released with Solr 5.0
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Mikhail Khludnev
mkhlud...@griddynamics.com wrote:
Hello,
Note, that timeout is checked only during the search. But for
Oh. You are saying you are sending a text file and somehow Tika gets involved.
Which handler are you sending it to and what format is your text file in?
If it's Solr XML/JSON or CSV, you should be sending it to the /update
handler, not the /extract one.
Regards,
Alex.
Sign up for my
i'm sending it too
/update/extract/
using the document interface in the web manager.
The text file is just an empty text document. I'm on a mac so utf-8 I
guess.
- Joel
On 19 December 2014 at 15:55, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Oh. You are saying you are sending a text
Then I don't understand what you are trying to do. I assume you have
gone through the tutorial and the explanation of the extract handler
(e.g. http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler ).
It feels like you are shooting yourself in the foot on purpose and
wonder why it hurts. What is
Thanks, decreased the caches at twice, increased the heap size to 16G,
configured Huge Pages and added these options:
-XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
-XX:+UseLargePages
-XX:+CMSParallelRemarkEnabled
-XX:+ParallelRefProcEnabled
-XX:+UseLargePages
-XX:+AggressiveOpts
-XX:CMSInitiatingOccupancyFraction=75
As Shalin points out, these cache sizes are wy out the norm.
For filterCache, each entry is roughly maxDoc/8. You haven't told
us now many docs are on the node, but you can find maxDoc on
the admin page. What I _have_ seen is a similar situation and
if you ever stop indexing you'll get OOM
Okay, thanks for the suggestion, will try to decrease the caches gradually.
Each node has near 50 000 000 docs, perhaps we need more shards...
We had smaller caches before but that was leading to bad feedback from our
users. Besides our application users we also use Solr internally for data
I looked for messages on the following error but dont see anything in nabble.
Does anyone know what this error means and how to correct it??
SEVERE: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException:
/var/apache/my-solr-slave/solr/coreA/data/index/write.lock does not exist
I also occasionally see error
I'm trying to get anything to index. Starting with the simplest file
possible. As it stands no extraction is working. I'm just trying to get any
extraction working. I've followed that guide, I'll try again.
J
On 19 December 2014 at 16:21, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Then I
: I'm trying to get anything to index. Starting with the simplest file
: possible. As it stands no extraction is working. I'm just trying to get any
: extraction working. I've followed that guide, I'll try again.
let's back up for a minute.
You have a plain text file, and you want to index it.
Hi there,
I have an index that has a field called collection_facet.
There was a value 'Ness Motley Law Firm Documents' that we wanted to update to
'Ness Motley Law Firm'. There were 36,132 records with this value. So I
re-indexed just the 36,132 records. After the update, I ran a facet
50K is still very, very large. You say you have 50M docs/node. Each
filterCache entry will be on the order of 6M. Times 50,000 (potential
if you turn indexing off). Or 300G memory for your filter cache alone.
There are OOMs out there with your name on them, just waiting to
happen at 3:00 AM after
On 12/19/2014 11:22 AM, Tang, Rebecca wrote:
I have an index that has a field called collection_facet.
There was a value 'Ness Motley Law Firm Documents' that we wanted to update
to 'Ness Motley Law Firm'. There were 36,132 records with this value. So I
re-indexed just the 36,132 records.
I have the following documents indexed
response
lst name=responseHeader
int name=status0/int
int name=QTime1/int
/lst
result name=response numFound=6 start=0
doc
str name=type_sphysicalcharacteristics/str
str name=test_haircolor_txtBlack/str
str name=test_eyecolor_txtGreen/str
/doc
doc
str
Set mincount=1
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
On Dec 19, 2014, at 12:22 PM, Tang, Rebecca rebecca.t...@ucsf.edu wrote:
Hi there,
I have an index that has a field called collection_facet.
There was a value 'Ness Motley Law Firm Documents' that we wanted to update
to 'Ness Motley Law
This sounds a lot like...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6643
: Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:54:03 -0700 (MST)
: From: solr-user solr-u...@hotmail.com
: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
: To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
: Subject: Re: Solr 4.10.2 Found core but I get No cores
26 matches
Mail list logo
