It would be a huge step forward if one could have several hundreds of Solr
collections, but only have a small portion of them opened/loaded at the
same time. This is similar to ElasticSearch's close index api, listed here:
http://www.elasticsearch.org/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/indice
Hi All,
Here’s more update on where I am at with this.
I enabled infoStream logging and quickly figured that I need to get rid of
maxBufferedDocs. So Erick you
were absolutely right on that.
I increased my ramBufferSize to 100MB
and reduced maxMergeAtOnce to 3 and segmentsPerTier to 3 as well.
M
Hello,
DocumentObjectBinder would benefit from a post bind call imo. Something
like:
public List getBeans(Class clazz, SolrDocumentList solrDocList,
boolean postBind) {
List fields = getDocFields(clazz);
List result = new ArrayList<>(solrDocList.size());
for (SolrDocument sdoc : s
I want SOLR 4.9 to log to my rolling tomcat logs like
catalina.2015-03-06.log. Instead I'm just getting a solr.log with no
timestamp. Maybe this is this just the way it has to be now?
I'm also not sure if I need to copy more SOLR jars into my tomcat lib.
This is my setup.
tomcat6/conf/log4j
Shawn,
Thanks!
I was using Document Viewer and not Adobe Acrobat so was unclear.
The TOC I meant was as in a traditional print publication with section
#s, etc. Not a navigation TOC sans numbering as in Adobe.
The Confluence documentation (I can't see the actual stylesheet in use,
I don't t
Well, the only work-around we found to actually work properly is to override
the problem causing tokenizer implementations on by one. Regarding the
WordDelimiterFilter, the quickest fix is enabling keepOriginal, if you don't
want the original to stick around, the filter implementation must be mo
On 3/6/2015 10:20 AM, Patrick Durusau wrote:
> I was looking at the PDF version of the Apache Solr Reference Guide
> 5.0 and noticed that it has no TOC nor any section numbering.
> http://apache.claz.org/lucene/solr/ref-guide/apache-solr-ref-guide-5.0.pdf
>
> The lack of a TOC and section headings
Greetings,
I was looking at the PDF version of the Apache Solr Reference Guide 5.0
and noticed that it has no TOC nor any section numbering.
http://apache.claz.org/lucene/solr/ref-guide/apache-solr-ref-guide-5.0.pdf
The lack of a TOC and section headings makes navigation difficult.
I have ju
On 3/6/2015 1:34 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> In Solr 5.0, the cloud graph is sorting the collections by name. The
> shard names also appear to be sorted -- all the collections I have on
> the example cloud setup only have two shards, so I really can't be sure.
> It might also be sorting the replica
Thats good to know.
On http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml it also states about dynamicFields
that "you can create field rules that Solr will use to understand what
datatype should be used whenever it is given a field name that is not
explicitly defined, but matches a prefix or suffix used in a
I don't believe the order in file matters for anything apart from
initParams section. The longer - more specific one - matches first.
Regards,
Alex.
Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter:
http://www.solr-start.com/
On 6 March 2015 at 11:21, Tom Devel wrote:
>
Hi,
I am running solr 5 using basic_configs and have a questions about the
order of defining fields and dynamic fields in the schema.xml file?
For example, there is a field "hierarchy.of.fields.Project" I am capturing
as below as "text_en_splitting", but the rest of the fields in this
hierarchy,
bq: You say in our case some docs didn't made it to the node, but
that's not really true: the docs can be found on the corrupted nodes
when I search on ID. The docs are also complete. The problem is that
the docs do not appear when I filter on certain fields
this _sounds_ like you somehow don't ha
Hello,
i'm looking for a solution for the following situation:
I have a website consisting of two sites.
One site is called "home" and one is called "search".
On the search site i have embeded solr via iframe.
On the home site there should be a search field.
When the search field is fired it shoul
I did more testing following your question... And now all makes sense
and I think that maybe a more clear explanation on documentation can help.
I was using Grouping where a group is created also if only one element
is present, I have inferred that expanded section was showing ALL
collapsed reco
Help me understand this better (regarding ranking).
If I have two docs that are 100% identical with the exception of uid (which is
stored but not indexed). In a single core setup, if I search "xyz" such that
those 2 docs end up ranking as #1 and #2. When I switch over to two core
setup, doc-A
If I have SOLR document with field value such as:
"a ? c ? e"
And I want a phrase query such as "a b c d e" to match that document.
So:
q:"a b c d e" --> return doc with "a ? c ? e" as field value for "q" field.
Is this possible, or is there a way it can be done with a plug-in using
lower lev
On 3/6/2015 3:25 AM, manju16832003 wrote:
> Solr 5 has been released. I was just giving a try and come across the same
> issue. As I heard over from some documentation, Solr 5 doesn't come with
> default core (example in earlier versions). And this requires us to create
> a core from Solr Admin. W
The expand component only displays the groups heads when it finds expanded
documents in the group. And it only expands for the current page.
Are you finding situations where there are group heads on the page, that
have child documents that are not being expanded?
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at
I think these frequencies are not the frequence of the term in the same index
:
- original frequency represents the number of results that you have in
lucene index when you query "who".
- suggestion frequency is the number of results of this term in the
spellcheck dictionnary.
I guess you're usi
I'm using Solr 4.10.1 and FieldCollapsing but when adding expand=true
and activating ExpandComponent the expanded section into result contains
only one group head and not all group heads present into the result.
I don't know if this is the intended behaviour. Using a query q=*:* the
expanded sec
Hello everyone.
I'm working with Solr 4.3. I use the Spellechecker component which gives me
suggestions as i expect.
I will explain my problem with an example :
I am querying /"cartouchhe"/instead of /"cartouche"/.
I obtain these suggestions
array (size=5)
0 =>
array (size=2)
'w
Try -
bin/solr create -c inventory
> On Mar 6, 2015, at 05:25, manju16832003 wrote:
>
> Solr 5 has been released. I was just giving a try and come across the same
> issue. As I heard over from some documentation, Solr 5 doesn't come with
> default core (example in earlier versions). And
zkhost=hostnames,
port=some port
variables in your solr.xml should work?
I have tested this with tomcat not with jetty, this stays with your config.
Rajesh.
On Mar 5, 2015 9:20 PM, "Aman Tandon" wrote:
> Thanks shamik :)
>
> With Regards
> Aman Tandon
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 3:30 AM, shamik
Solr 5 has been released. I was just giving a try and come across the same
issue. As I heard over from some documentation, Solr 5 doesn't come with
default core (example in earlier versions). And this requires us to create
a core from Solr Admin. When I tried to create the core, I get the followin
do you use solrcloud?maybe your suggestion is not support distribute
2015-03-04 22:39 GMT+08:00 Nitin Solanki :
> Hi..
>I have a term("who") where original frequency of "who" is 191 but
> when I get suggestion of "who" it gives me 90. Why?
>
> Example :
>
> *Original Frequency* comes like
you can write a macro in you velocity template,which is used to show your
query response
2015-03-06 1:14 GMT+08:00 Henrique O. Santos :
> Hello,
>
> I’ve been trying to have a pretty name for my facets on Velocity Response
> Writer. Do you know how can I do that?
>
> For example, suppose that I a
On 3/2/2015 2:12 PM, spillane wrote:
> Since the order is consistently 1,4,2,3 it sounds like I can start the
> leaders in 1,4,2,3 order and then replicas in 1,4,2,3 order and expect the
> relationships to stick
>
> leader1 -> replica1
> leader4 -> replica4
> leader2 -> replica2
> leader3 -> repl
28 matches
Mail list logo
