Hi Everyone,
Looking at the out-of-the box schema.xml of Solr 5.1, I see this:
fieldType name=payloads stored=false indexed=true
class=solr.TextField
analyzer
Is it valid to have stored and indexed on fieldType/? My
understanding is that those are on field/ only. If not, is the
Comments inline:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Gopal Jee zgo...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to understand the role of overseer and solrCloud stateChange
mechanism. I tried finding resources on web, but with not much luck.
Can someone point me to some relevant doc or explain. Few doubts i
Hi,
I am suddenly seeing this error message when I try to index documents using
SolrJ client. The same piece of code was working fine last time when I
indexed the documents. But now, this is the error message being thrown on
the SolrJ client. Request your urgent help as this is very high priority
Yeah, it took me a few tries to get it all straight in my head.
Perhaps this will help. Whether or not to install Zookeeper on the same
node as Solr is entirely your decision. And I'm assuming that you're NOT
talking about the embedded Zookeeper BTW.
The only problem with running ZK on the same
Both cool and interesting.
Andrea, does your Solr RDF indexing project support inference? If so, is
inference done by Jena or ahead of time before indexing by Solr?
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Gazzarini [mailto:a.gazzar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 7:31 AM
To:
On 4/28/2015 3:58 AM, balmydrizzle wrote:
Just happen to have same issue as this question posted on stackoverflow site:
Why Solr default Multivalued to true? - Stack Overflow
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21933032/why-solr-default-multivalued-to-true
It has been my experience that if I
Hi there,
I tried the solution provided in
https://lucidworks.com/blog/solution-for-multi-term-synonyms-in-lucenesolr-using-the-auto-phrasing-tokenfilter/
.The mentioned solution works when the indexed data does not have alpha
numerics or special characters. But in my case the synonyms are
Hi,
I checked comments in the example schema.xml it says false by default.
How do you figure out that it is true?
Ahmet
On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 1:05 PM, balmydrizzle balmydriz...@gmail.com wrote:
Just happen to have same issue as this question posted on stackoverflow site:
Why Solr
Hi,
I am using Solr to do some complex querying. Some queries require me to
return one main document and some expanded documents at the same time. When
I run the query without extracting any expanded document, the performance is
good. But once I added the expanded conditions, the performance
Thanks a lot for being patient with me. Unfortunately there is no button load
term info. :-(
Can you may be help me using the TermsComponent instead? I read it is per
default configured.
Thanks a lot
Best
Steve
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Erick Erickson
Yes, that's because DELETEREPLICA doesn't support async at this time. It's
expected and documented.
The reason why it's not supported is because when ASYNC mode was
introduced, it was only added for tasks that could end up running longer
than the http timeout.
It might be a good thing to have for
Facets! I believe Google Search Appliance does not support facets. Which
means it supports search, but not post-search results tuning. In general,
custom metadata was problematic with GSA
Cost. I know at least one - very large, international, company moving to
Solr from Google Search Appliance
Hi
In Solrcloud (4.6.1) every time a property/value is changed in
solrcore.properties file, a core/collection reload is needed to pick up the
new values.
Core/Collection reloads for large collections (example 100 shards) is very
expensive (performance wise) and can pose a threat to the
There better be.
1 go to the admin UI
2 select a core
3 select schema browser
4 select a field from the drop-down
Until you do step 4 the window will be pretty blank.
Here's the info for TermsComponent, what have you tried?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/The+Terms+Component
: I am thinking to index these companies name in solr since all the
functionality already there?
:
: Do we have support for spark?
https://github.com/LucidWorks/spark-solr
Also of possible interest...
http://lucidworks.com/blog/solr-yarn/
https://github.com/LucidWorks/yarn-proto
Just to add, my solrconfig.xml is the standard one, with no modifications.
It was taken directly from the collection1 core from 4.10.2 installation.
However, in schema.xml, I have added my own fields. Hope it has got nothing
to do with schema.xml
Thanks Regards
Vijay
Shani,
Off topic: that footer of yours may collide with list policy. All content here
is publicly available, in case you missed it.
@LAFK_PL
Oryginalna wiadomość
Od: Chaushu, Shani
Wysłano: wtorek, 28 kwietnia 2015 14:59
Do: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Odpowiedz: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Hi Steve,
From
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Field+Type+Definitions+and+Properties:
The properties that can be specified for a given field type fall into
three major categories:
• Properties specific to the field type's class.
• General Properties Solr supports for
Hi Charlie,
definitely cool and interesting.
Best,
Andrea
On 04/28/2015 10:20 AM, Charlie Hull wrote:
On 27/04/2015 21:41, Andrea Gazzarini wrote:
Hi guys,
I'd like to share with you a project (actually a hobby for me) where I'm
spending my free time, maybe someone could get some idea or
Hi,
I'm trying to use the Solr Tika language detection.
I added to the Solrconfig.xml:
updateRequestProcessorChain name=langid
processor
class=org.apache.solr.update.processor.TikaLanguageIdentifierUpdateProcessorFactory
str name=langid.flcontent/str
str
Johannes,
If you just want to implement a custom search syntax, Solr can be great for
this. You just need a Solr query parser which takes a search string and
allows you to translate that into any number of Lucene queries. These are
fairly straightforward to implement with a small amount of Lucene
Hi,
just a wild guess: you are calling /solr/update instead of
/solr/collection/update
Regards
Stephan
Von:Vijaya Narayana Reddy Bhoomi Reddy
vijaya.bhoomire...@whishworks.com
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org,
Datum: 28.04.2015 13:57
Betreff:Expected mime type
Hi guys,
I used the Erick's suggestions (thanks again!!) to create a new field and
copy in it the _text content.
curl -X POST -H 'Content-type:application/json' --data-binary '{
add-field : { name:content, type:string, indexed:true,
stored:true}, add-copy-field : { source:_text, dest: [
Thanks Stephen, that was the issue. In the URL, I missed the solr part.
Thanks for your help. Functionality is working fine now.
Thanks Regards
Vijay
On 28 April 2015 at 13:05, Stephan Schubert stephan.schub...@sick.de
wrote:
Hi,
just a wild guess: you are calling /solr/update instead of
Hi Daniel,
no, unfortunately not...it is definitely one of the interesting
challenges of this wedding: inference in responses or crazy things
like inferential faceting.
It's all in the grocery list :) but I never thought about the concrete
implementation. Thanks for your suggestions.
Best,
Well, frankly if what they have already serves their needs, I see no reason
they should switch. Investing time and effort in more modern technology
without a compelling reason is a waste.
Personally, I'd just leave the argument there. Talk to the stake-holders in
the product and get them to list
Hi All
I have around 20 million company name and I want to index them.
Currently What I am doing I am tokenizing and for each token I am applying
Metaphone 3 and then Stroring each token in Hbase.
When I get new query(company to match) I will again tokenize and apply
metaphone3 as I did when I
On 4/28/2015 4:40 AM, shacky wrote:
I'm using Solr for 3 years and now I want to move to a SolrCloud
configuration on 3 nodes which would make my infrastructure highly
available.
But I am very confused about it.
I read that ZooKeeper should not be installed on the same Solr nodes,
but I
This is a bug. Can you please open a Jira issue?
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Ian Rose ianr...@fullstory.com wrote:
Is it possible to run DELETESHARD commands in async mode? Google searches
seem to indicate yes, but not definitively.
My local experience indicates otherwise. If I start
Hi,
We have a client that will have a website in Ektron CMS. As you may know
Ektron has good integration with Solr and that is primary reason for us
developers to use it.
But the client does not want to switch from their Google Mini Search
appliance even though Google stopped support for it
Hi Uwe,
Today, I downloaded Solr 5.1 and it worked fine. It seems that this bug fix
SOLR-7139 is only included in 5.1, not 5.0.
Thank everyone for your support.
Trung.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:21 AM, trung.ht trung...@anlab.vn wrote:
Hi Uwe,
Thanks for the answer, but it looks like it
Done!
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7481
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a bug. Can you please open a Jira issue?
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Ian Rose ianr...@fullstory.com wrote:
Is it possible to run
Hi Ian,
DELETESHARD doesn't support ASYNC calls officially. We could certainly do
with a better response but I believe with most of the Collections API calls
at this time in Solr, you could send random params which would get ignored.
Therefore, in this case, I believe that the async param gets
Hi,
When I perform a query, the matching document related field information is
displayed separate from the highlighting information. Is there a way to
merge these two so that highlighting for each document appears within the
document level information itself. That way, it would be easier to find
: I would still use ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer as it is good for catching up
: when my indexing has fallen behind. I know it swallows exceptions.
I feel like you are missing the point of when/why
ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer compared to your goal of load balancing
updates.
The *only* feature
Could you provide a few more details?
1) Version of Lucene/Solr
2) A sample slow query
3) Number of unique values in the collapse field
4) Number of search results before the collapse
5) Number of results fetched in the page
6) Performance numbers for the query
Joel Bernstein
Hi,
I am entirely new to the world of SOLR programming and I have the
following questions:
In addition to our regular searches we need to implement a specialised
form of range search and ranking. What I mean by this is that users can
search for one or more numeric ranges like 17:85,205:303 etc.
Hi Ian,
What do you mean by *my testing shows* ? Can you elaborate on the steps
and how did you confirm that the call was indeed *async* ?
I may be wrong but I think what you're seeing is a normal DELETEREPLICA
call succeeding behind the scenes. It is not treated or processed as an
async call.
Hi Anshum,
FWIW I find that page is not entirely accurate with regard to async
params. For example, my testing shows that DELETEREPLICA *does* support
the async param, although that is not listed here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Collections+API#CollectionsAPI-api9
Cheers,
because of th enature of the CSV format, the order of the fields *has* to
be deterministic and consistent for all documents, so the response writer
sorts them into the approrpaite columns.
for JSON XML formats this consistency isn't required, so instead Solr
writes out hte fields of each
2015-04-28 19:45 GMT+02:00 Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com:
I think you're over-thinking the problem though. How often does a
machine fail? If it's more
often than once in an blue moon, you have _other_ problems.
My needs are not only high availability (for which 2 nodes would be
Yeah, it took me a few tries to get it all straight in my head.
Thanks Erick for your fast answer!
The only problem with running ZK on the same node as Solr is that if the
node goes down, it takes _both_ zookeeper and Solr with it. If running
the embedded zookeeper, then you can't even
Your last comment really answered. A ZK quorum is explicitly ((num zk
instances)/2) + 1.
So no, you don't need 6 nodes at all. It's perfectly reasonable to run
a Solr instance
on each node and a ZK instance (not embedded) on the same three nodes.
I think you're over-thinking the problem though.
Thanks a ton shalin. Now i have a very clear view of state change. Will
certainly help me stabilize my cluster issues.
Thanks a lot.
Gopal
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
Comments inline:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Gopal Jee
Shawn / Hoss,
I see that CloudSolrServer appeared in SolrJ 4.5, will that work with a 4.2
SolrCloud? If so I'll upgrade my client and point the CloudSolrServer
constructor at my 5 ZK hosts.
I would still use ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer as it is good for catching up
when my indexing has fallen
SolrCloud does need up to twice the amount of disk space as your usual
index size during replication. Amongst other things, this ensures you have
a full copy of the index at any point. There's no way around this, I would
suggest you provision the additional disk space needed.
On 20 Apr 2015 23:21,
Hi.
I'm using Solr for 3 years and now I want to move to a SolrCloud
configuration on 3 nodes which would make my infrastructure highly
available.
But I am very confused about it.
I read that ZooKeeper should not be installed on the same Solr nodes,
but I also read another guide that installs
Thanks Shawn for the insight. WIll try your recommendations .
Gopal
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Rajesh Hazari rajeshhaz...@gmail.com
wrote:
thanks, i am sure that we have missed this command line property, this
gives me more information on how to use latest solr scripts more
Hi there,
editing the solr.in.cmd and list the zookeeper hosts there instead of
passing them via parameter in the console worked. I'm using Solr 5.1 btw.
Von:Stephan Schubert stephan.schub...@sick.de
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org,
Datum: 27.04.2015 19:06
Betreff:Start
I am trying to understand the role of overseer and solrCloud stateChange
mechanism. I tried finding resources on web, but with not much luck.
Can someone point me to some relevant doc or explain. Few doubts i have:
1. In doc, it says overseer updates clusterstate.json when a new node
joins. How
Just happen to have same issue as this question posted on stackoverflow site:
Why Solr default Multivalued to true? - Stack Overflow
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21933032/why-solr-default-multivalued-to-true
--
View this message in context:
On 4/28/2015 1:14 PM, spillane wrote:
I see that CloudSolrServer appeared in SolrJ 4.5, will that work with a 4.2
SolrCloud? If so I'll upgrade my client and point the CloudSolrServer
constructor at my 5 ZK hosts.
I would still use ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer as it is good for catching up
Sure. Here is an example of ADDREPLICA in synchronous mode:
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/collections?action=addreplicacollection=293shard=shard1_1
response:
response
lst name=responseHeader
int name=status0/int
int name=QTime1168/int
/lst
lst name=success
lst
lst name=responseHeader
int
On 27/04/2015 21:41, Andrea Gazzarini wrote:
Hi guys,
I'd like to share with you a project (actually a hobby for me) where I'm
spending my free time, maybe someone could get some idea or benefit from it.
https://github.com/agazzarini/SolRDF
I called it SolRDF (Solr + RDF): It is a set of Solr
If copies of the index are not eventually cleaned up, I'd fill a JIRA to
address the issue. Those directories should be removed over time. At times
there will have to be a couple around at the same time and others may take
a while to clean up.
- Mark
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:27 AM Ramkumar R.
Is it possible to run DELETESHARD commands in async mode? Google searches
seem to indicate yes, but not definitively.
My local experience indicates otherwise. If I start with an async
SPLITSHARD like so:
Hi Everyone,
if add fl=field_1, field_2 in a query the order of fields in the
response is good for my needs :
{
field_1 : value X,
field_2 : value Y
}
*however* it works only with the CSV reponse format :-(
How do i get the same functionnality with for instance XML and JSON
Branko,
Your client's existing enterprise search isn't supported now, so I'm not
saying that you should stick with Google Mini Search appliance. However,
there are some things that Solr doesn't do well, and you should be aware of
these before advocating Solr as a pure developer.Here are
58 matches
Mail list logo