Sergio:
Done.
Best,
Erick Erickson (there are never too many Erik/Eric/Erick's in the world)
2015-05-18 2:38 GMT-07:00 Sergio Velasco ser...@mitula.com:
Hi Erik,
I had it created. My user is SergioVelasco.
Thank you.
Regards.
www.mitula.com
Sergio Velasco | Dpto. de Desarrollo
I'm having some normalization issues when trying to search decimal fields
(i.e. TrieDoubleField copied to TextField).
1. Wildcard searching: I created a separate TextField field type (e.g.
filter_decimal) which filters whole numbers to have at least one decimal
place (i.e. dot zero) using the
On Mon, May 18, 2015, at 01:42 PM, Steven White wrote:
Hi Everyone,
With regards to Solr 5.0+, can someone point me where I can find out more
on:
1) Why WAR support is deprecated and is being dropped from Solr? and
2) How do I deploy Solr 5.1 in a servlet other than Jetty, such as
At this point you can. At this point you have a war file anyway, so...
Eventually this will be unsupported, I expect that _eventually_
there'll be a change that makes this no longer possible.
So my question back to you is why you have to run Solr in a servlet
container? Why not just use the
Maybe you should first disclose the nature of the business problem you are
trying to solve.
To be clear, patterns and wildcards are string processing operations, not
numeric operations. Usually one searches for ranges of numeric values. So,
again, what operation are you really trying to perform
This feels like an XY problem. Either you're working with numbers or
you're not. It's hard for me to imagine what purpose is served by a
query on numerical data that would match 2.5, 20.5, 299.5,
299.5 etc, much less regexes. That may just be my limited
imagination however.
You could
Hi,
I tried performing a join query
{!join from=fA to=fB}
where fA was string and fB was text using keywordTokenizer
it doesn't work, but it does if either fields are both string or both
text.
If you confirm this is the correct behavior I'll
They should not have to be *exactly* the same type... just compatible
types such that the indexed tokens match.
When you used the keywordTokenizer, was there other analysis such as
lowercasing going on?
-Yonik
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Matteo Grolla matteo.gro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
What's the rest of the stack trace? The fragment you provided isn't
enough to say much. There should be a caused by bit somewhere that
should provide a more informative message.
Best,
Erick
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 3:24 AM, Manohar Sripada manohar...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using 4.7.2 version of
Hi everyone,
Recently I upgraded to solr 5.1.0. When trying to generate facets using
the more like this handler, I now get a a NullPointerException. I never
got this exception while using Solr 4.10.0 Details are below:
Stack Trace:
at
Hello,
I need to use the solr.ICUFoldingFilterFactory on my solrCloud instances
and so I need to know which is the best way to include this jar on the
classpath of each node of the solrcloud. I tried to put it on the
[collection_name]/lib folder and create the collection using solr create
but
Great!!!
Many Thanks.
Hehehe :)
www.mitula.com
Sergio Velasco | Dpto. de Desarrollo
Contáctame:
ser...@mitula.com | Tfno. +34 917 08 21 47 | Fax +34 917 08 21 56
Síguenos en:
Facebook.com/mitula.es.latam | @mitula_es | Linkedin.com/mitula |
Blog
El
Thanks Shawn and Upayavira.
What about the second part of my question? I guess I was not clear on it,
so let me try again. Lets say I want to use Solr in a container other that
Jetty, such as WebSphere or Tomcat. If the WAR will be deprecated, is it a
matter of copying other Solr files into
Jack,
Thanks for the information. If I understand this correctly, the White space
tokenizer will break a single token of size 300 into two tokens, one of size
256 and the other of size 44. If this is true, then for the single test
document I have used, in the index in the portal_package field,
Hi Everyone,
With regards to Solr 5.0+, can someone point me where I can find out more
on:
1) Why WAR support is deprecated and is being dropped from Solr? and
2) How do I deploy Solr 5.1 in a servlet other than Jetty, such as
WebSphere?
Thanks
Steve
thank you Ahmet !
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com.invalid
wrote:
Hi Chalitha,
You may find these two relevant.
http://www.semanticmetadata.net/lire/
https://bitbucket.org/dermotte/liresolr
Ahmet
On Monday, May 18, 2015 2:17 PM, chalitha udara Perera
Hi Chalitha,
You may find these two relevant.
http://www.semanticmetadata.net/lire/
https://bitbucket.org/dermotte/liresolr
Ahmet
On Monday, May 18, 2015 2:17 PM, chalitha udara Perera
chalithaud...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alex,
Just watched the presentation, It is a very good starting point
Hi everyone,
Recently I upgraded to solr 5.1.0. When trying to generate facets using
the more like this handler, I now get a a NullPointerException. I never
got this exception while using Solr 4.10.0 Details are below:
Stack Trace:
at
On 5/18/2015 6:42 AM, Steven White wrote:
With regards to Solr 5.0+, can someone point me where I can find out more
on:
1) Why WAR support is deprecated and is being dropped from Solr? and
2) How do I deploy Solr 5.1 in a servlet other than Jetty, such as
WebSphere?
As of 5.1, and probably
Shawn,
Sorry about my mistake. I have rerun the test with the correct fieldType
definition. Still have the same results. See test information below.
field name=portal_package type=text_std indexed=true stored=true
multiValued=true/
fieldType name=text_std class=solr.TextField
I just tested out what you've mentioned and see the same behavior. I think
it calls for a JIRA and a fix.
distrib=false shouldn't consult zk in my opinion, else it makes no sense to
have that param. I'm not sure but it might just be regression.
Can you create a JIRA? I'll take it up soon if no
Sorry for not spotting that earlier. Lucene itself does have such a limit.
No way around it - an individual term is limited to 32K-2 bytes. Lucene is
designed for searching of terms, not large blob storage.
Maybe you defined that field as a string originally and later updated your
schema to a
As large users of Solr/Lucene for many of our existing sites
(BoatTrader.com, GetAuto.com, ForRent.com, etc) we would like for the
ability to contribute to the wiki as we come across items. My current
wiki login is BillTrembley (bill.tremb...@gmail.com).
Thanks,
Bill Trembley
Director of
No, not using SynonymFilterFactory. Rather take that as a base for a
custom Filter that
doesn't use any input file. Rather it would normalize any numeric
tokens and inject
as many variants on the spot as you desire.
Best,
Erick
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Todd Long lon...@gmail.com wrote:
Background:
I'm using Solr as a mechanism for search for users, but before even getting
to that point as a means of intelligent inference more or less. Product
data comes in and we're hoping to match it to the correct known product
without having to use the user for confirmation/search.
Problem:
Does a boost field in Solr has any use on the core calculation? For what I can
see in [1] If a boost attribute is used in the doc/field level it my be encoded
in the norm field and then used to boost the specific match in the doc/field.
But I've a schema.xml with a boost field defined and using
For what I'm seeing I've defined a boost field in my docs, this field is
defined as float which has the following fieldType:
fieldType name=float class=solr.TrieFloatField precisionStep=6/
Is a boost field used by default to boost a document? I couldn't find any
reference to this behaviour
Hi,
*Problem Statement: *I want to reload an hash of protwords created by the
kstem filter without reloading the whole index core.
*My Thought: *I am thinking to reload the hash by passing a parameter
like *r=1
*to analysis url request (to somehow pass the parameter via url). And I am
thinking
No, the field has always been text. And from the error, its obviously passing a
very large token to the index, regardless of the tokenizer and filter.
So I guess I will have to tokenize and filter the text before I send it to
solr, since solr is not able to properly handle a very large token.
Essentially, we have a grid of data (i.e. frequencies, baud rates, data
rates, etc.) and we allow wildcard filtering on the various columns. As the
user provides input, in a specific column, we simply filter the overall data
by an implicit starts with query (i.e. 23 becomes 23*). In most cases,
Thanks for the quick and precise answer,
fb are lowercased so indexed tokens don't match
Il giorno 18/mag/2015, alle ore 16:54, Yonik Seeley ha scritto:
They should not have to be *exactly* the same type... just compatible
types such that the indexed tokens match.
When you
On 5/18/2015 8:07 AM, Steven White wrote:
Thanks Shawn and Upayavira.
What about the second part of my question? I guess I was not clear on it,
so let me try again. Lets say I want to use Solr in a container other that
Jetty, such as WebSphere or Tomcat. If the WAR will be deprecated, is
Bill - done.
Thanks in advance for your contributions!
Erik - waves from not too far away in VA too
On May 18, 2015, at 12:06 PM, Bill Trembley
bill.tremb...@dominionenterprises.com wrote:
As large users of Solr/Lucene for many of our existing sites
(BoatTrader.com,
Hi Erick,
This isn't about deploying Solr using the WAR file, this is about a
business need in which I may not be able to use Jetty that comes with Solr
5.x.
My organization has issues with Jetty (some customers don't want Jetty on
their boxes, but are OK with WebSphere or Tomcat) so I'm trying
On Mon, May 18, 2015, at 05:11 PM, Steven White wrote:
Hi Erick,
This isn't about deploying Solr using the WAR file, this is about a
business need in which I may not be able to use Jetty that comes with
Solr
5.x.
My organization has issues with Jetty (some customers don't want Jetty on
The maxScore is 772 when I remove the
description.
I suppose the actual question, then, is if a low relevancy score on one
field
hurts the rest of them / the cumulative score,
This depends a lot on how you're searching over these fields. Is this a
(e)dismax query? Or a lucene query? Something
Also, I wouldn't expect at all that query-to-query you'll get comparable
scores. I'm not at all surprised that suddenly you get big swings in
scoring. So many parts of the scoring equation can change query to query.
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Doug Turnbull
Hey Doug,
Thanks for the quick reply.
No edismax just yet. Planning on getting there, but have been trying to
fine tune the 3 primary fields we use over the last week or so before
jumping into edismax and its nifty toolset to help push our accuracy and
precision even further (aside: is this a
You might just need some syntax help. Not sure what the Solr admin escapes,
but many of the text in your query actually have reserved meaning. Also,
when a term appears without a fieldName:value directly in front of it, I
believe its going to search the default field (it's no longer attached to
Thanks again for the speediness, Doug.
Good to know on some of those things, not least of all the + indicating a
mandatory field and the parentheses. It seems like the escaping is pretty
robust in light of the product number.
I'm thinking it has to be largely related to the analyzer. Check this
Hey John,
I think you likely do need to think about escaping the query operators. I
doubt the Solr admin could tell the difference.
For analysis, have you looked at the handy analysis tool in the Solr Admin
UI? Its pretty indespensible for figuring out if an analyzed query matches
an analyzed
Hi,
I'm having an issue with searching a term in german. Here's the keyword(s)
I'm trying to search -- Software und Downloads
I've a document indexed in German with the same title -- Software und
Downloads
I'm expecting that the search on Software und Downloads will return this
document,
Doug,
A couple things quickly:
- I'll check in to that. How would you go about testing things, direct URL?
If so, how would you compose one of the examples above?
- yup, I used it extensively before testing scores to ensure that I was
getting things parsed appropriately (segmenting off the unit
Doug,
very very cool tool you've made there. thanks so much for sharing!
i ended up removing the shinglefilterfactory and voila! things are back in
good, working order with some great matching. i'm not 100% certain as to
why shingling was so ineffective. i'm guessing the stacked terms created
Just for our future reference:
1. Which schema field type analyzer combination was producing the exception?
2. Can you provide the full stack trace for the exception?
It shouldn't be possible to get the exception when using the white space
tokenizer, due to the noted issue, so which tokenizer
Glad you figured things out and found splainer useful! Pull requests, bugs,
feature requests welcome!
https://github.com/o19s/splainer
Doug
On Monday, May 18, 2015, John Blythe j...@curvolabs.com wrote:
Doug,
very very cool tool you've made there. thanks so much for sharing!
i ended up
Thanks for the info.
I was afraid that there's a memory leak, although so far the problem didn't
occur after I enlarge the PermGen size.
Is there any way to check the current PermGen size usage and prevent it
before the system crash? I've read some articles and they recommend that I
can include
On 5/18/2015 7:34 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:
Not out of the box.
Fields are parsed into tokens and queries search on tokens. An empty string
has no tokens for that field and a missing field has no tokens for that field.
If you really need to do this, then you’ll need to turn the empty
You can look inti Lire solr plugin. Works very well while searching similar
images.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 18, 2015, at 9:14 AM, chalitha udara Perera chalithaud...@gmail.com
wrote:
thank you Ahmet !
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com.invalid
wrote:
I really have in mind an index-time filter, not necessarily a
query-time Filter. So at index time you have something like 123.4000.
You index synonyms 123.4 and 123 (or whatever) and now your _queries_
should just work since the forms you need are in the index already
and whether it's a regex or
Please help or I am not clear here?
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Aman Tandon amantandon...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
*Problem Statement: *I want to reload an hash of protwords created by the
kstem filter without reloading the whole index core.
*My Thought: *I am
On 5/18/2015 7:16 PM, Lianyi Han wrote:
Would field: works in your case?
Best,
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:56 PM Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote:
Can I search for the empty string? This is distinct from searching for
documents that don't have a certain fieldat all, which I can
Sounds interesting to test it out. I only played with 5.10 recently on
empty string search,it seems that *field:* (double quotes) works, but
not *field:''* ( single quotes )
Best,
-lianyi
Unity of knowing and doing
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Shawn Heisey elyog...@elyograg.org wrote:
Not out of the box.
Fields are parsed into tokens and queries search on tokens. An empty string has
no tokens for that field and a missing field has no tokens for that field.
If you really need to do this, then you’ll need to turn the empty string in a
special token that means “empty string”,
Erick Erickson wrote
No, not using SynonymFilterFactory. Rather take that as a base for a
custom Filter that
doesn't use any input file.
OK, I just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something that could be done
with the SynonymFilterFactory itself. At one time, I started going down this
Would field: works in your case?
Best,
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:56 PM Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote:
Can I search for the empty string? This is distinct from searching for
documents that don't have a certain fieldat all, which I can already do
with a clause of *:* -field:[*TO *]in
Can I search for the empty string? This is distinct from searching for
documents that don't have a certain fieldat all, which I can already do
with a clause of *:* -field:[*TO *]in my query.
Thanks,
Shawn
Hi all,
I'm trying to index feature vectors extracted from images for similarity
search.
As a simple example, I have a color histogram of a image represented as a
double array.
Is there a way I can index a feature vector in Solr without using hashing ?
Thanks,
Chalitha
--
J.M Chalitha Udara
Hi Erik,
I had it created. My user is SergioVelasco.
Thank you.
Regards.
www.mitula.com
Sergio Velasco | Dpto. de Desarrollo
Contáctame:
ser...@mitula.com | Tfno. +34 917 08 21 47 | Fax +34 917 08 21 56
Síguenos en:
Facebook.com/mitula.es.latam | @mitula_es |
The error happens either when you have too large codebase or when you are
String-intensive in your application (Solr including) or when your previous
process did not terminate well.
Can't say for certain what Solr usage scenarios are string intensive
without deep look at it's code. Usually
Have you looked at the Solr Revolution presentation yet?
https://youtu.be/WjnLhtwp678?list=PLU6n9Voqu_1FM8nmVwiWWDRtsEjlPqhgP
Regards,
Alex.
Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter:
http://www.solr-start.com/
On 18 May 2015 at 19:04, chalitha udara Perera
I am using 4.7.2 version of Solr. Cluster contains 16 VMs for Solr and 3
Zookeeper VMs. I am creating a bunch of collections (total 54)
sequentially. I am getting the below error during one of the collection
creation. This error is intermittent.
* Could not fully createcollection:
Hi Alex,
Just watched the presentation, It is a very good starting point for me.
I am looking for a more generic solution to indexing any given feature
vector.
Thanks a lot !
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Have you looked at the Solr
63 matches
Mail list logo
