David, et al.
2 questions.
Is this a good tradeoff for performance?
Also, RptWithGeometrySpatialField improved performance on what type of
searches? Does it support multivalued lat,lon fields?
Does LatLonType support multivalued lat,lon fields or only RPT allows for
this?
--
Bill Bell
bil
I've tried to do some minor modification in the code under
JiebaSegmenter.java, and the highlighting seems to be fine now.
Basically, I created another int called offset2 under process() method.
int offset2 = 0;
Then I modified the offset to offset2 for this part of the code under
process() metho
@Erik: thanks, overlooked that...added fq= before geofilt and now it works :)
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/geolocation-search-ignores-distance-parameter-tp4241564p4241571.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 11/22/2015 5:39 PM, PeterKerk wrote:
> Why is the result below returned even though I'm filtering in a radius of 20
> from geocoordinates defined in pt parameter in the querystring?
> As you can see the result in _dist_ in this result is is far larger than 20.
>
> http://localhost:8983/solr/loc
Looks like your query doesn't actually make geofilt be an actual fq parameter.
> On Nov 22, 2015, at 19:39, PeterKerk wrote:
>
> Why is the result below returned even though I'm filtering in a radius of 20
> from geocoordinates defined in pt parameter in the querystring?
> As you can see the re
Why is the result below returned even though I'm filtering in a radius of 20
from geocoordinates defined in pt parameter in the querystring?
As you can see the result in _dist_ in this result is is far larger than 20.
http://localhost:8983/solr/locs/select/?indent=on&facet=true{!geofilt}&pt=51.98,
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Mikhail Khludnev
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I also played with json.facet, but couldn't achieve the desired result too.
>
> Yonik, Alessandro,
> Do you think it's a new feature or it can be achieved with the current
> implementation?
Not sure if I'm misunderstanding the
>You seem to be suggesting that the UI be broken down into components that can
>be authorised independently.
Yes, this is what I was mostly concerned of. It doesn’t apply much with today’s
Admin UI though...
>For myself, right now, I'm just keen to see that if authentication is required
>for S
Don,
You seem to be suggesting that the UI be broken down into components
that can be authorised independently. For example, a user who is allowed
to query, but not to update, should not have access to UI elements (such
as documents in its current incarnation) that allow updating. This is
taking t
Hello,
I also played with json.facet, but couldn't achieve the desired result too.
Yonik, Alessandro,
Do you think it's a new feature or it can be achieved with the current
implementation?
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 2:50 PM, xavi jmlucjav wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to get some faceting with the
These are just Lucene indexes. There's the Cloud backup and restore
that is being worked on.
But if the index is static (i.e. not being indexed to), simply copying
the data/index (well, actually the whole data index and subdirs)
directory will backup and restore it. Copying the index directory bac
11 matches
Mail list logo