Hello Max,
Since it reports the first space occurrence pos=32, I advise to nuke all
spaces between braces in sum().
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Max Bridgewater
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following configuration for firstSearcher handler in
> solrconfig.xml:
>
>
>
>
>
>
Shawn:
bq: The bottleneck is definitely Solr.
Since you commented out the server.add(doclist), you're right to focus
there. I've seen
a few things that help.
1> batch the documents, i.e. in the doclist above the list should be
on the order of 1,000 docs. Here
are some numbers I worked up one tim
Have you tried 'tie' parameter?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/The+DisMax+Query+Parser#TheDisMaxQueryParser-Thetie%28TieBreaker%29Parameter
Regards,
Alex.
Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates:
http://www.solr-start.com/
On 1 April 2016 at 14:03
You may be interested in checking out:
http://luxdb.org/ - seems to be still on Solr 4.x though
http://siren.solutions/siren/overview/ - I believe they indexed XML
Regards,
Alex.
Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates:
http://www.solr-start.com/
On 1 April 2016 at
Hi Shawn and Jack,
Yes that is true. I was referring the tutorial and practicing and ended up
in this.
By the way, one more thing I would like to know, is it possible to schedule
the full data import? or the delta import?
i.e. on regular intervals the data should be updated.
Regards,
GNT
On Sat
On 4/1/2016 1:24 PM, Girish Tavag wrote:
> Finally i'm able to figure out the problem. The issue was in
> solrconfig.xml where the booleans was defined. I replaced booleans with
> boolean and other similar fileds and it worked correctly :)
This has happened because you mixed the solrconfig.xml fi
I think it's a bug...
Ah, the key clue is here:
Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: fieldType 'booleans' not
found in the schema
at
org.apache.solr.update.processor.AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessor
Factory$TypeMapping.populateValueClasses(AddSchemaFieldsUpdateProcessor
Factory.java:
Hi Shawn,
Finally i'm able to figure out the problem. The issue was in
solrconfig.xml where the booleans was defined. I replaced booleans with
boolean and other similar fileds and it worked correctly :)
Regards,
GNT.
Tamas,
This feels a bit like a "user favorites" problem.
I did a little searching and found this... Don't know if it will help, but
when I'm looking for stuff like this I find it helps to try to come up with
generic or different descriptions of my problem and go search those as
well...
http://s
Tamas,
I'm brainstorming here - not being careful, just throwing out ideas...
One thing that comes up is a separate document in SOLR - one doc for each
list.
If a user adds a doc to their list, that doc's id gets added to this other
type of document...
So, a document with the title "List 1" wou
Hi Shawn,
Thank you for responding and informing me about the attachments. Here is
the log file details..
016-04-01 18:24:08.191 INFO (coreLoadExecutor-6-thread-1) [
x:myDatabase] o.a.s.c.CachingDirectoryFactory looking to close
solr-5.5.0\server\solr\myDatabase\data\index
[CachedDir
On 4/1/2016 12:11 PM, Girish Tavag wrote:
> I copied schema.xml from solr-5.5.0\example\example-DIH\solr\db\conf\
> to \solr-5.5.0\server\solr\myDatabase\conf\
> I've attached the file too.
>
> @Shawn
> The file does not have any field which defined as name="somefield" type="booleans" indexed
Here is the error message "*myDatabase:*
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:
fieldType 'booleans' not found in the schema"
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Girish Tavag
wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
> I copied schema.xml from solr-5.5.0\example\example-DIH\solr\db\c
Hi Jack,
I copied schema.xml from solr-5.5.0\example\example-DIH\solr\db\conf\
to \solr-5.5.0\server\solr\myDatabase\conf\
I've attached the file too.
@Shawn
The file does not have any field which defined as
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Jack Krupansky
wrote:
> Exactly which file did yo
OK - I get it. List order is totally arbitrary and cannot be tied to an
hard data point.
I'll have to think - Perhaps billnbell's solution will help, although I'm
not totally sure I understand that suggestion yet.
At this point, you could get all the documents for List X that match the
search te
Sorry I don't know what you mean.
If "listpos" field contains multiple values like "list=pos" then is it
possible to order by field value where that field value fits a query?
For example list 1 contains: p1 and p2, list 2 contains p2 and p1 in this
order, then
p1 document has a listpos field wit
Put the match into 2 separate fields and index it. Then sort in Solr by the 2
fields is one way
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
> On Apr 1, 2016, at 11:15 AM, John Bickerstaff
> wrote:
>
> Just to be clear - I don't mean who requests the list (application or user)
> I mean what "rule" determines
So, the list order is determined by the user. The user creates a list, adds
products to it and i have to display these list using filters and
pagination.
Let's assume there is list with 1 products in it. In the website where
i display the list only 50 products are displayed in a page. So if i
Oh - and if you send a copy of your query - please include a human-readable
version of what your intent is...
Something like: Find all the documents that have "blue" in the color field
in addition to searching the title field for the user's search term..."
...Or whatever your intent is for this s
Just to be clear - I don't mean who requests the list (application or user)
I mean what "rule" determines the ordering of the list?
Or, is there even a rule of any kind?
In other words, does a user arbitrarily decide that documentA, documentF,
and documentW should be on a list of their own? For
Some of the lists are created by users and some are generated by
applications, it doesn't matter.
It would be fine to solve it in Solr because Solr does the work of
filtering and pagination. If sorting were done outside than I would have to
read every document from Solr to sort them. It is not an
Specifically, what drives the position in the list? Is it arbitrary or is
it driven by some piece of data?
If data-driven - code could do the sorting based on that data... separate
from SOLR...
Alternatively, if the data point exists in SOLR, a "sub-query" might be
used to get the right sort or
Hi,
I have the following configuration for firstSearcher handler in
solrconfig.xml:
parts
score desc, Review1 asc, Rank2 asc
make
{!func}sum(product(0.01,param1),
product(0.20,param2), min(param2,0.4)) desc
For example I have to display sellable products which are in list X in the
correct order.
If I add a "status" and "list" (multivalued) fields to every document
(products), then I can execute a query: status:sellable AND list:X, where X
is the ID of the list. The list field contains IDs of the list
I think this is a classic XY Problem , you are trying to solve X with Y ,
and you are asking us about Y .
Could you describe us what is your X problem ? What are you trying to do
with this ordered lists ?
If not I would add a field to the product called :
list_position ( or a similar name) of type
I don't think I understand your problem properly. Are you trying to
pre-sort the products?
On Fri, 1 Apr 2016, 19:49 Tamás Barta, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem and I don't know how should I solve it in Solr.
>
> I have products indexed. Every product can be in lists. It is possible that
> a
Hi,
I have a problem and I don't know how should I solve it in Solr.
I have products indexed. Every product can be in lists. It is possible that
a product isn't in any list or it is in multiple list.
In a list the products are ordered. I would like to search for products in
a specified list with
Let's try to make clarity in here : Lucene Query Syntax is not XPath.
This means you can not search Lucene Documents as you do for xml nodes.
You need to model your information according to the Lucene Document ( and
children) structure.
Then you can play with the Lucene Query language and the diff
The docs on reclaimDeletesWeight say:
"Controls how aggressively merges that reclaim more deletions are
favored. Higher values favor selecting merges that reclaim deletions."
I can't imagine you would notice anything after only a few commits. I
have many shards that size or larger and what I
On 30 March 2016 at 17:46, Erick Erickson wrote:
> through a clever bit of reflection, you can set the
> reclaimDeletesWeight variable from solrconfig by including something
> like
> 5 (going from memory
> here, you'll get an error on startup if I've messed it up.)
I added the following to my
Hi everybody
I'm looking for the way to store XML file and keep on hierarchy of the
data because I need show full xml and besides to search inside of nodes
of xml.
Only I have found XPathEntityProcessor for import xml but it does not
keep on the hierarchy of the data.
I have not found one ty
31 matches
Mail list logo