You haven't really told us what you tried and what the failure was.
Is your problem getting the _configuration_ created or using the
system variables after they're created?
You need to tell us exactly _what_ you tried and exactly _how_ what
you tried didn't work. Details matter, particularly what
bq: fq value, say 20 char
Well, my guess here is that you're constructing a huge OR clause
(that's the usual case for such large fq clauses).
It's rare for such a clause to be generated identically very often. Do
you really expect to have this _exact_ clause created over and over
and over
You can just put a directive in your solrconfig.xml file
that points to the jar in analysis-extras.
I generally prefer that to copying things around on the theory that
it's one less thing to forget to copy sometime later...
Best,
Erick
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Nawab Zada Asad Iqbal
When I do 'ant server', the libs from "./build/lucene-libs/" are copied
over to "./server/solr-webapp/webapp/WEB-INF/lib/" . However, my required
class is in a lib which is on:
"./build/contrib/solr-analysis-extras/lucene-libs/"
I guess, I need to do the contrib target?
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 4:
Hi Erick
"bin/solr start -e techproducts" works fine. It is probably because it is
not referring to 'org.apache.lucene.analysis.ic
u.ICUNormalizer2CharFilterFactory' in the schema.xml ?
I am not sure what should I try. I am wondering if there is some document
about solr dev setup.
On Fri, Jun 2
In this case, for example:
http://host1:8983/solr/collName/admin/mbeans?stats=true
returns us stats in the contex of the shard of "collName", living on host1,
is not it?
BR
Daniel
Am 02.06.2017 20:00 schrieb "Daniel Angelov" :
Sorry for the typos in the previous mail, "fg" should be "fq"
Am 02.
Hi Nawab,
We did exact the same way like Rick recommended. When you apply your
change from your old configs on top of the originals, it will give you the
errors for incompatible settings. For an example of
"text_general_edge_ngram" fieldType setting, side="front" is no longer
valid attributes.
T
Hi,
Sorry for the delay, here are my replies:
1. I'm not yet a spark user (but I'm working on that :))
2. I'm not sure I understand how you would use a feature that is not a float
into a model,
in my experience all the learning to rank methods always train and predict from
a list of
floats.
Sorry for the typos in the previous mail, "fg" should be "fq"
Am 02.06.2017 18:15 schrieb "Daniel Angelov" :
> This means, that quering alias NNN pointing 3 collections, each 10 shards
> and each 2 replicas, a query with very long fg value, say 20 char
> string. First query with fq will cache
This means, that quering alias NNN pointing 3 collections, each 10 shards
and each 2 replicas, a query with very long fg value, say 20 char
string. First query with fq will cache all 20 chars 30 times (3 x 10
cores). The next query with the same fg, could not use the same cores as
the first
In the documentation for Solr cdcr there is an example of a source
configuration that uses properties:
${TargetZk}
${SourceCollection}
${TargetCollection}
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=62687462#CrossDataCenterReplication(CDCR)-InitialSt
Mike:
That's one possibility. What I'm really asking for is to be sure that
there's a good reason (yours is one).
It's just that I've spent too much time in my life trying to get
something to work only to discover that it has marginal utility so I
like to ask "is this important enough to take tim
To throw out one possibility, a read only file systems has no (low?)
possibility of corruption. If you have a static index then you shouldn't
need to be doing any recovery. Would still need to run ZK with RW
filesystem, but mybe Solr could work?
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Erick Erickson
bq: This means, if we have a collection with 2 replicas, there is a chance,
that 2 queries with identical fq values can be served from different
replicas of the same shards, this means, that the second query will not use
the cached set from the first query, is not it?
Yes. In practice autowarming
that's pretty much my strategy.
I'll add parenthetically that I often see the bottleneck for indexing
to be acquiring the data from the system of record in the first place
rather than Solr. Assuming you're using SolrJ, an easy test is to
comment out the line that sends to Solr. There's usually som
Thanks for the answer!
This means, if we have a collection with 2 replicas, there is a chance,
that 2 queries with identical fq values can be served from different
replicas of the same shards, this means, that the second query will not use
the cached set from the first query, is not it?
Thanks
Dan
"ant server" should be sufficient. "dist" is useful for when
you have custom _external_ programs (say SolrJ) that you
want all the libraries collected in the same place. There's
no need to "ant compile" as the "server" target
I assume what you're seeing is a ClassNotFound error, right?
I'm a bit p
A similar pattern should work with .NET, all that's
necessary is a JDBC driver for connecting to the database
and an connection to a Solr node.
SolrNet will not be as performant as SolrJ I'd guess
since there's no equivalent to CloudSolrClient. You
can still SolrNet, any connection to any Solr nod
As Susheel says, this is iffy, very iffy. You can disable tlogs
entirely through solrconfig.xml, you can _probably_
disable all of the Solr logging.
You'd also have to _not_ run in SolrCloud. You say
"some of the nodes eventually are stuck in the recovering phase"
SolrCloud tries very hard to keep
I see. You can create a JIRA and submit patch and see if committers agree
or have different opinion/suggestion.
Thanks,
Susheel
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Sergio García Maroto
wrote:
> You are right about that but in some cases I may need to reindex my data
> and wanted to avoid deleting
Hi,
Solr 4.7 is old but is probably okay. Is it easy to try a 6.x version?
(note Spatial4j java package names have changed). There's also multiple
new pertinent options to your scenario:
https://locationtech.github.io/spatial4j/apidocs/org/locationtech/spatial4j/context/jts/JtsSpatialContextFact
Hi Rick,
I am not sure that Solr can take that stand once it stopped producing a
standalone war (Rationale for which is rather well documented here:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/WhyNoWar)
If Solr is asking users not to use standalone containers and wants to be
used as a Server then it must provide
Once you've scaled up the export from collection4 you can test the
performance of the join by moving the NullStream around the join.
parallel(null(innerJoin(collection 3, collection4)))
Again you'll want to test with different numbers of workers and replicas to
see where you max out performance o
innerJoin(intersect(innerJoin(collection1, collection2),
innerJoin(collection 3, collection4)),
collection5)
Let's focus on:
innerJoin(collection 3, collection4))
The first thing to focus on is how fast is the export from collection4. You
can test t
You are right about that but in some cases I may need to reindex my data
and wanted to avoid deleting the full index so
I can still server queries. I thought reindexing same version would be
handy or at least to have the flexibility.
On 2 June 2017 at 14:53, Susheel Kumar wrote:
> I see the diff
Thanks for the correction Shawn. Yes its only the heap allocation settings
are per host/JVM.
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 6/1/2017 11:40 PM, Daniel Angelov wrote:
> > Is the filter cache separate for each host and then for each
> > collection and then for each shard
On 6/1/2017 11:40 PM, Daniel Angelov wrote:
> Is the filter cache separate for each host and then for each
> collection and then for each shard and then for each replica in
> SolrCloud? For example, on host1 we have, coll1 shard1 replica1 and
> coll2 shard1 replica1, on host2 we have, coll1 shard2
On 5/29/2017 8:57 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote:
> And if you start all three in DC1, you have 3+3 voting, what would
> then happen? Any chance of state corruption?
>
> I believe that my solution isolates manual change to two ZK nodes in
> DC2, while your requires config change to 1 in DC2 and manual
> sta
I see the difference now between using _version_ vs custom versionField.
Both seems to behave differently. The _version_ field if used allows same
version to be updated and that's the perception I had in mind for custom
versionField.
My question is why do you want to update the document if same v
The heap allocation and cache settings are per host/JVM not for each
collection / shards. In SolrCloud you execute queries against a collection
and every other collection may have different schema/document id's and
all. So answer to your question, query1 from coll1 can't use results
cached from qu
Just to confirm again before go too far, are you able to execute these
examples and see same output given under "Optimistic Concurrency".
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Updating+Parts+of+Documents#UpdatingPartsofDocuments-In-PlaceUpdates
Let me know which example you fail to ge
I doubt it can run in readonly file system. Even though there is no
ingestion etc. Solr still needs to write to logs/tlogs for synching /
recovering etc
Thnx
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Wudong Liu wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> We have a normal build/stage -> prod settings for our production pi
Vrin
We had a good speedup from enabling a SQL cache. You also need to avoid
updating the DB tables so the cache does not get flushed.
Cheers -- Rick
On June 2, 2017 4:49:20 AM EDT, vrindavda wrote:
>Thanks Erick ,
>
>Could you please suggest some alternative to go with SolrNET.
>
>@jlman, I tr
Hi All:
We have a normal build/stage -> prod settings for our production pipeline.
And we would build solr index in the build environment and then the index
is copied to the prod environment.
The solrcloud in prod seems working fine when the file system backing it is
writable. However, we see man
Hi,
I have synced lucene-solr repo because I (will) have some custom code in
lucene and solr folders. What are the steps for starting solr server? My
schema.xml uses ICUNormalizer2CharFilterFactory (which I see in lucene
folder tree), but I don't know how to make it work with solr webapp. I know
t
Thanks for the replies. Just to confirm that I got it right:
1. Since there is no setting to control index writers, is it fair to assume
that Solr always indexes at maximum possible speed?
2. The way to control write speed is to control number of clients that are
simultaneously posting data, right?
solr-version:4.7.0
field spec as follows:
And i index some MULTILINESTRING (wkt formatted shape， the road data), and
i query use "Intersects" spatial predicates like
fq=geom:"Intersects(POLYGON((-10 30, -40 40, -10 -20, 40 20, 0 0, -10 30)))
distErrPct=0".
In fact, i want to query the shape
On 02/06/2017 00:56, Doug Turnbull wrote:
Scrapy is fantastic and I use it scrape search results pages for clients to
take quality snapshots for relevance work
+1 for Scrapy; it was built by a team at Mydeco.com while we were
building their search backend and has gone from strength to strength
I had a look to the source code and I see
DocBasedVersionConstraintsProcessorFactory
if (0 < ((Comparable)newUserVersion).compareTo((Comparable)
oldUserVersion)) {
// log.info("VERSION returning true (proceed with update)" );
return true;
}
I can't find a way of overwriting sa
Thanks Erick ,
Could you please suggest some alternative to go with SolrNET.
@jlman, I tried your way, that do reduces the number of request, but
delta-import still take longer than full-import. There is no improvement in
performance.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.
I am using 6.1.0.
I tried with two different field types, long and date.
I am using this configuration on the solrconfig.xml
false
UpdatedDateSD
i had a look to the wiki page and it says
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Upda
41 matches
Mail list logo
