This is my pet peeve in Solr.
When q={!join ..}all tokens goes into join qp
but even if we put space in front of curly brace q= {!join
..}1st_only_token_goes_to_join_qp
I remember there were some discussion in comments, but I believe it is not
raised ever raised as a defect.
We have some json
Hi,
We were using bit older version Solr 4.10.2 and upgrading to Solr7.
We have like 4mil records in one of the core which is of course pretty
huge, hence re-sourcing the index is nearly impossible and re-querying from
source Solr to Solr7 is also going to be an exhausting effort.
Hence, I
Yes, we have TZ parameter for that which worked only for date math. I need
to convert the date time zone on the client side.
Thanks
Renuka Srishti
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 11/16/2017 4:54 AM, Renuka Srishti wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your
Hii Rick,
All clients are in different time zone. So I was searching for some support
which can convert the date fields in the query response in given time zone.
Thanks
Renuka Srishti
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Rick Leir wrote:
> Renuka
> Are your clients all in the
I found the suggesters very memory hungry. I had one particularly large
index where the suggester should have been filtering a small number of
docs, but was mmap'ing the entire index. I only ever saw this behavior with
the suggesters.
On 22 November 2017 at 03:17, Walter Underwood
Am 23.11.17 um 20:13 schrieb Mikhail Khludnev:
Hello, David.
It should be like
q=name:"Mike" AND {!join from=pid to=id v=$qq}=city:"London" AND id:"a1"
Thanks a lot!
But this looks like working around a bug, given that
>> {!join from=pid to=id}(city:"London" AND id:"a1")
works fine. Is
Haven't done it myself, but maybe these could be useful:
https://github.com/DiceTechJobs/SolrPlugins
https://github.com/leonardofoderaro/alba
Regards,
Alex.
http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced
On 21 November 2017 at 05:22, Zara Parst
Hi,
I am working on Solr to develop a toll to make analysis. I am using search
function of Streaming Expressions, which requires a field to be indexed
with docValues enabled, so I can get it.
Suppose that after someone finishes the analysis, and would like to get
other fields of the resultset
Nawab
What do you see in the log file?
If nothing else is solving the problem, then get a sample V7 solrcinfig.xml and
use it, modified to suit your needs.
Cheers -- Rick
On November 22, 2017 11:38:13 AM EST, Nawab Zada Asad Iqbal
wrote:
>Rick
>
>Your suspicion is correct. I
Hello, David.
It should be like
q=name:"Mike" AND {!join from=pid to=id v=$qq}=city:"London" AND id:"a1"
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:06 PM, David Frese
wrote:
> Hi there everbody,
>
> I want to combine joins with multiple criteria and other criteria, with
> variying
Hi there everbody,
I want to combine joins with multiple criteria and other criteria, with
variying boolean operators, but I keep getting
"org.apache.solr.search.SyntaxError: Cannot parse" errors. I tried with
an installation of version 6.3, and also with the embedded server in
version 7.1
Hi all,
Is it possible to return the results of a spellcheck in addition to the
spellcheck WITHOUT sending another query request?
Example:
Client sends "educatione", results returns education results as well as noting
that the term "educatione" was spellchecked.
Thanks
Sid Latty
On 11/23/2017 8:06 AM, marotosg wrote:
I am trying to strip out any "." at the end of a token but I would like to
keep the original token as well.
This is my index analyzer
i was thinking of using the solr.PatternReplaceFilterFactory but i see
Hi Sergio,
You can use PatternCaptureGroupFilterFactory to emit both tokens. This token
filter is not documented in recent documentation but it is still there.
HTH,
Emir
--
Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection
Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training -
Hi all,
I am trying to strip out any "." at the end of a token but I would like to
keep the original token as well.
This is my index analyzer
i was thinking of using the solr.PatternReplaceFilterFactory but i see this
one won't keep the original
Hi Mikhail,
group.facet=false, but group.truncate=true.
I found out that if the group.truncate parameter is true, the query will be
much slower (x5 times), regardless of faceting.
I thought, that the group.truncate param is meaningless without activating the
facet system, but this is not the
Hi Shawn,
Thanks for the info. We will most likely be doing sharding when we migrate
to Solr 7.1.0, and re-index the data.
But as Solr 7.1.0 is still not ready to index EML files yet due to this
JIRA, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11622, we have to make use
with our current Solr
Hi Magnus,
Not sure if this is the right group for this question and I did not code this
part for a long time, and not sure if fully understood the issue, but can you
map higlighting to Map?
Also, not sure if using this in example in your tests, but you are missing
Hi,
We're started to migrate our integration-framework to move over to JavaEE
JSON-B as default json-serialization /deserialization framework and now the
highlighning component is giving us some troubles. Here's a constructed example
of the JSON response from Solr.
{
"responseHeader":{
That's great!! Got it.
Thank you very much.
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Emir Arnautović <
emir.arnauto...@sematext.com> wrote:
> Hi Roxana,
> The idea with update request processor is to have following parameters:
> * inputField - document field with text to analyse
> * sharedAnalysis -
20 matches
Mail list logo