You can assign multiple values to text field and leverage
positionIncrementGap
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/field-type-definitions-and-properties.html#general-properties
And why wouldn't you use your Lucene plugin in Solr?
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Amin Raeiszadeh
how is it possible to add custom gaps between terms of
TextFiled in solr documents. for example between term
number 1 and 2 we need 200 gap and between term number
2 and 3 we need 1000 gap.
i can only send key-value pair as String to solr(then solr
index fields in different types according to
Thanks Erick, good point on maxMergedSegmentMB, many of my segments really
are max out.
My index isn't 800G, but it's not far from it - it's about 250G per server.
I have high confidence in Solr and my EC2 i3-2xl instances, so far I got
pretty good results.
--
Sent from:
So I'm guessing you have something on the order of an 800G index?
The max segment size is roughly 5G (by default) and assuming all your segments
are close to the max size I get 160 * 5G = 800G, but that may be off.
I think you're barking up the wrong tree if these numbers are close to
correct.
Yeah, much as I love SolrCloud (and make most of my living working
with it), it does have its complexities.
My rule of thumb is that you really want to consider SolrCloud when
you start having to shard or need NRT
searching.
You trade the complexity of maintaining your own sharding etc. for the
Στις 15/12/2017 20:05, ο Shawn Heisey έγραψε:
On 12/15/2017 2:53 AM, Georgios Petasis wrote:
I have a field of type "date_range" defined as:
The problem is that sorting on this field does not work (despite the
fact that I put dates in there). Instead I get an error prompting to
perform
Στις 15/12/2017 20:05, ο Shawn Heisey έγραψε:
On 12/15/2017 2:53 AM, Georgios Petasis wrote:
I have a field of type "date_range" defined as:
The problem is that sorting on this field does not work (despite the
fact that I put dates in there). Instead I get an error prompting to
perform
On 12/15/2017 12:12 PM, David Hastings wrote:
Also the complexity of adding another 3
or more machines just to do nothing but ZK stuff was getting out of hand.
You can run ZK on the same machines that are running Solr. The only
strong recommendation that I would make is that it should be a
While I don't know what exact solr image you use I can tell you this:
1. The command of your dockerfile probably starts solr. A Docker container
will automatically shutdown if the process that was started by it's command
is killed. Meaning you should never 'restart' a process in a container, but
To be clear - I'm talking about query performance, not indexing performance.
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Thanks for the quick answer Erick,
I'm hoping to improve performance by reducing the number of segments.
Currently I have ~160 segments. Am I wrong thinking it might improve
performance?
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
11 matches
Mail list logo
