Yet again: thanks a lot!
Spellchecking@solr:
what are the best (up-to-date) sources/links for spellchecking and suggestions?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Januar 2018 18:23
An: solr-user
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: SolrCl
Here is the newly created Jira ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11921
On 27 January 2018 at 08:19, Greg Roodt wrote:
> Ok, thanks for the clarification. I'll open a Jira issue.
>
>
>
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 at 01:21, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
>> Yes, please open a JIRA issue.
>> The
On 1/27/2018 6:53 AM, SOLR4189 wrote:
1. You are right, due to memory and garbage collection issues I set each
shard to different VM. So in my VM I has 50 GB RAM (10 GB for JVM and 40 GB
for index) and it works good for my using case. Maybe I don't understand
solr terms, but if you say to set one
bq: I am still getting "suggestions" (from spellcheck.q)
OK, this is actually expected behavior. The spellcheck is done from
the _indexed_ terms. Documents deleted from the index are marked as
deleted, the associated terms are not purged from the index until the
segment is merged. When just checki
Hi,
Does anyone have any idea on this?
Regards,
Edwin
On 9 January 2018 at 14:22, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Solr 7.2.0.
>
> Would like to check, is there a way that we can index the MD5 and SHA256
> fields that are being extracted by Tika for EML files?
>
> Example:
> X-T
I must clarify a few things:
the unittest I noted does not check/perform a DBQ but a "simple" deleteById.
The deleted document is no more found (as expected) BUT I am still getting
"suggestions" (from spellcheck.q). So my problem is not that I find deleted
documents but suggestions resulting from
