So we have a dockerized aws environment with the solr docker container having
only 4 gigs for max ram.
Our problem is whenever we index, the container containing the leader shard
will restart after around 2 or less minutes of index time (batch is 50 docs
per batch with 3 threads in our app thread
Hi,
I tried setting up a bespoke ShardHandlerFactory configuration for each
request handler in solrconfig.xml. However when I stepped through the code
in debug mode (via IntelliJ) I could see that the ShardHandler created and
used in the searcher still didn't reflect the values in solrconfig (even
Hello Erik,
Sorry for the confustion . here is the scenario.
We have 2 fields rank,price for each product. multiple products may have
same rank but different prices.
So on products listing page, by default we will group on rank and show 3
products for each group and sort based on Rank.
But Cust
Thanks Shawn!
Based on what you said, is my query supposed to work as is if I set
luceneMatchVersion=7.1.0? It does not appear to.
Also, my understanding is using the local param makes the AND apply only to
the following search terms provided to the "q" query string. If I add a
q.op=AND as a se
bq. I just wanted to know if there is any attribute which says sort on all the
document list instead of relative to group results.
I really don't know what you want here. "sort on all the document list" seems
like just sorting without grouping.
>From that problem statement I don't see what groupi
Thanks for the reply Shawn.
I have tried multiple combination of group.sort and sort but non of them
worked.
I just wanted to know if there is any attribute which says sort on all the
document list instead of relative to group results.
Can you please help if you have any idea or work around ?
T
TRUS_STORE is a typo (I used what was already there, I just uncommented it).
I'm on a different network so I have to type everything by hand. I was
hoping I put enough already , but ugh... probably more typos to come. Here
it is:
2018-09-10 19:17:15.311 WARN: (main) [ ] o.e.j.u.c.AbstractLifeCy
Hi Erik,
Thank you! I did mess with the v parameter, but I was doing it wrong. I
was doing this v='([2013-07-08 TO 2013-07-09] OR [2013-07-21 TO
2013-07-25])'
Anyways, I needed to use the "fq" parameter and I did this fq=({!field
f=collection_date_range op=Within v='[2013-07-08 TO 2013-07-09]'}
When using the {!...} syntax, and combining it with other clauses, the
expression parsed needs to come from a local-param `v` parameter (otherwise,
without `v`, the parser eats the rest of the string after the closing curly
bracket). So you could do something like this:
q={!field f=collec
Hi Shawn,
Thank you. So just to confirm, there is no way for me to use an OR
operator with also using the "within" op parameter described in the bottom
of this page?
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/working-with-dates.html#WorkingwithDates-MoreDateRangeFieldDetails
I appreciate your res
On 9/10/2018 1:21 PM, Antelmo Aguilar wrote:
Hi,
I have a question. I am trying to use the "within" op parameter in a Date
Search. This works like I would expect: {!field f=collection_date_range
op=Within}[2013-07-08 TO 2013-07-09]
I would like to use an OR with the query though, something li
On 9/10/2018 12:47 PM, cyndefromva wrote:
I installed solr 5.4.1 and java 1.8 on its own linux server and used the
install_solr_service.sh file to install and setup solr. At this point I was
able to start the process and access the dashboard from a browser. After
shutting down solr I then attempt
Hi,
I have a question. I am trying to use the "within" op parameter in a Date
Search. This works like I would expect: {!field f=collection_date_range
op=Within}[2013-07-08 TO 2013-07-09]
I would like to use an OR with the query though, something like this: {!field
f=collection_date_range op=Wit
I installed solr 5.4.1 and java 1.8 on its own linux server and used the
install_solr_service.sh file to install and setup solr. At this point I was
able to start the process and access the dashboard from a browser. After
shutting down solr I then attempted to enable SSL via the Enabling SSL
You very often get _much_ more detail in the Solr log rather than the
admin UI BTW
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 8:50 AM Monique Monteiro
wrote:
>
> Hi Andrea,
>
> In fact, I had to add *logLevel="debug"* to the DIH configuration. Just
> checking "Debug" on console is not enough. I also checked "V
Oh, I see I missed that fix. The versions were 6.2.1 and 6.6.2 (I
mistakenly said before they were both 6.6).
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018, 2:35 AM Susheel Kumar wrote:
> Thanks. I have 6.6.2. Do you remember the exact minor version which you
> run into with corruptIndex. I did fix it using CheckIndex.
Hi Andrea,
In fact, I had to add *logLevel="debug"* to the DIH configuration. Just
checking "Debug" on console is not enough. I also checked "Verbose". Now,
a database exception (locked account is shown).
Thanks!
Monique
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 12:26 PM Andrea Gazzarini
wrote:
> I cannot gi
I cannot give you detailed instructions as I don't have in front of me a
Solr console with the dataimport enabled, but I remember that there's a
detailed section which reports a lot of information.
In the meantime: shooting in the dark, if the query is working and
"total rows fetched" = 0, the
This is shown in the section "Raw Debug-Response".
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 12:20 PM Andrea Gazzarini
wrote:
> Hi Monique, this is the output; when you check the debug checkbox
> another section is printed
>
> Andrea
>
> On 10/09/2018 17:19, Monique Monteiro wrote:
> > Text:
> >
> > { "responseHe
Hi Monique, this is the output; when you check the debug checkbox
another section is printed
Andrea
On 10/09/2018 17:19, Monique Monteiro wrote:
Text:
{ "responseHeader": { "status": 0, "QTime": 463 }, "initArgs": [ "defaults",
[ "config", "data-cnpj-config.xml" ] ], "command": "full-import",
Text:
{ "responseHeader": { "status": 0, "QTime": 463 }, "initArgs": [ "defaults",
[ "config", "data-cnpj-config.xml" ] ], "command": "full-import", "mode":
"debug", "documents": [], "verbose-output": [], "status": "idle", "
importResponse": "", "statusMessages": { "Time Elapsed": "0:0:0.432", "To
Copy and paste the text of the error. Pictures of text aren’t very useful, even
when
they do make it through the mail reflector.
Also, expand the error (the small info button) to get a stack trace.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Sep
Hi Monique,
I think you cannot attach files / images, please post, if available, the
url of the image or a text description.
Andrea
On 10/09/2018 17:05, Monique Monteiro wrote:
Hi Andrea,
Solr console doesn't return a very different information even with
debug mode enabled:
image.png
On
Hi Andrea,
Solr console doesn't return a very different information even with debug
mode enabled:
[image: image.png]
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 12:00 PM Andrea Gazzarini
wrote:
> You can check the solr.log or the solr-console.log. Another option is to
> activate the debug mode in the Solr console
You can check the solr.log or the solr-console.log. Another option is to
activate the debug mode in the Solr console before running the data import.
Andrea
On 10/09/2018 16:57, Monique Monteiro wrote:
Hi all,
I have a data import handler configured with an Oracle SQL query which
works like a
Every time you see "Expected mime type application/octet-stream but got
text/html” from SolrJ,
it means that Solr returned an error. Look for an error in the Solr logs at the
same time as the
SolrJ message.
It could be any error, which is why we can’t help more. After you know the Solr
error, w
Hi all,
I have a data import handler configured with an Oracle SQL query which
works like a charm. However, when I have the same query configured in
Solr's data import handler, nothing happens, and it returns:
"*Total Requests made to DataSource*": "1",
"*Total Rows Fetched*": "0",
It would be best to ask on the Nutch mailing list, this list doesn't
have very many people who know _how_ Nutch uses Solr though.
Best,
Erick
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 11:47 PM Bineesh wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
> We are using Nutch 1.15 and Solr 6.6.3
>
> We tried crawling one of the URL and and noticed
You can't do this with boosting. Boosting affects scoring, i.e. the
ranking. I'd expect this to show many topic As before anything else,
other things being equal.
For a limited number of topics, you could group by the topic and get
the top 70 of each, throwing away the extras in topics B and C.
Y
You can't do this with boosting. Boosting affects scoring, i.e. the
ranking. I'd expect this to show
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 12:37 AM sara hajili wrote:
>
> Hi
> I have some docs in my solr index. and now i want to run a query. please
> help me how create this query?
> i have documents like this:
Hey Shawn,
i removed the additional jars and tried the foreground option with the
following result:
2018-09-10 11:41:03.174:INFO::main: Logging initialized @616ms to
org.eclipse.jetty.util.log.StdErrLog
2018-09-10 11:41:03.313:INFO:oejs.Server:main: jetty-9.4.10.v20180503; built:
2018-05-03T15
Hi
I have some docs in my solr index. and now i want to run a query. please
help me how create this query?
i have documents like this:
{
topic_code:"A"
},
{
topic_code:"B"
},
{
topic_code:"A"
},
{
topic_code:"A"
},
{
topic_code:"C"
},
{
topic_code:"A"
},..
now i want to get respanse from a solr 100
32 matches
Mail list logo