Hi Team,
I tried automated way to unsubscribe from solr-user emails. could you
please help me in unsubscribing the emails ?
--
Regards
Gaurav Srivastava
Cool!Looking forward to this patch to be available.
Best,TinsWzy
Mikhail Khludnev 于2018年12月22日周六 上午4:30写道:
> I've used the patch from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2646 a
> while ago.
>
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 6:34 PM Dominique Bejean <
> dominique.bej...@eolya.fr>
> wrote:
>
> >
Hi,
I created a Jira issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13097
Regards.
Dominique
Le lun. 31 déc. 2018 à 11:26, Dominique Bejean
a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> In debugging mode, I discovered that only in SolrCloud mode the collection
> name is extract from the request path in the init() m
On 1/1/2019 8:59 AM, John Milton wrote:
My document contains 65 fields. All the fields needs to be indexed. But for
the 100 documents takes 10 seconds for indexing.
I am using Solr 7.5 (2 cloud instance), with 50 shards.
The best way to achieve fast indexing in Solr is to index multiple items
thanks a lot for the explanation :)
-
Zeki ama calismiyor... Calissa yapar...
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Hi,
I am trying to debug a query to find out why one documentgets more score than
the other. The below are two similar products.
Below is the debug results I get from Solr admin console.
"Doc1": "\n15.20965 = sum of:\n 4.7573533 = max of:\n 4.7573533=
weight(All:2x in 962) [], result of:
Although Vincenzo and Alexandre's suggestions may be helpful in the right
circumstances, there is a continuum of answers to the original question
here. This continuum is mostly relevant if indexing and querying is likely
to happen simultaneously or the data volume is large enough relative to the
se
On 12/31/2018 2:48 PM, s...@cid.is wrote:
is there a way, better a solution, to access the Solr Admin GUI from
outside the server (via public web) while the Solr port 8983 is closed
by a firewall and only available inside the server via localhost?
If you've blocked the Solr port, then you can'
I think a better approach to tunneling would be:
ssh -p -L :localhost:8983 use...@myremoteserver.example.com
This requires you to set up a different port () rather than use the
standard 22 port (on your router and on your sshd config). I've been
running something like this for about
You could configure a reverse proxy to provide one or more means of
authentication.
However, I agree that the purpose why this is done should be clarified.
> Am 01.01.2019 um 19:02 schrieb Kay Wrobel :
>
> You can use ssh to tunnel in.
>
> ssh -L8983:localhost:8983 use...@myremoteserver.exampl
You can use ssh to tunnel in.
ssh -L8983:localhost:8983 use...@myremoteserver.example.com
This will only require port 22 to be exposed to the public.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 1, 2019, at 11:43 AM, Gus Heck wrote:
>
> Why would you want to expose the administration gui on the web? This is
Yes, exposing the admin UI on the web is very dangerous. Anyone who finds it
can delete all your collections. That UI is designed for “back office” use only.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Jan 1, 2019, at 9:43 AM, Gus Heck wrote:
>
Why would you want to expose the administration gui on the web? This is a
very hazardous thing to do. Never mind that it normally also runs on 8983
and all it's functionality relies on the ability to interact with 8983
hosted api end points.
What are you actually trying to solve?
On Dec 31, 2018
How are you indexing the documents? Are you using SolrJ or the plain
REST API?
Are you sending the documents one by one or all in one request? The
performance is far better if you send the 100 documents in one request.
If you send them individual, are you doing any commits between them?
regards
What have you tried? The first thing I'd try is using just 1 or 2
shards. My first guess is that you're doing a lot of GC because you
have 50 shards in a single JVM (1 replica/shard?).
I regularly get several thousand Wikipedia docs/second on my macbook
pro, so your numbers are way out of the norm
Hi to all,
My document contains 65 fields. All the fields needs to be indexed. But for
the 100 documents takes 10 seconds for indexing.
I am using Solr 7.5 (2 cloud instance), with 50 shards.
It's running on Windows OS and it has 32 GB RAM. Java heap space 15 GB.
How to improve indexing speed?
Not
16 matches
Mail list logo