Yes we need more details.
I wonder why you have configured the RunExecutableListener in your
solrconfig.xml and why you have told it to execute Linux commands on Windows.
RunExecutableListener is removed in later Solr versions due to security
concerns so you should anyway move away from it.
It
We have Sitecore and Solr setup.
Solr is running on windows.
Below errors are repeatedly appearing in logs.
o.a.s.c.RunExecutableListener java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "sh"
(in directory "\bin"): CreateProcess error=2, The system cannot find the
file specified
Hi,
For your info, this issue is occurring in Solr 7.7.0 as well.
Regards,
Edwin
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 00:10, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Should we report this as a bug in Solr?
>
> Regards,
> Edwin
>
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 22:18, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>>
Hi,
Which version of zookeeper are you using?
Also, if you tried to query the index, did you get any error message?
Regards,
Edwin
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 at 02:34, Jeff Courtade wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working n doing a simple point upgrade from solr 7.6 to 7.7 cloud.
>
> 6 servers
> 3
Do we need to reindex if we change synonymQueryStyle values for a fieldType ?
I hope not.
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Hi Eric, Found the reason and all shard request to go /select flow solves the
problem.
Regarding
In SOLR 7 when relevancy added for the search it is not working (not
expected results) for the above fieldtype but same works fine for /select
because it uses Lucene Parser but our flow uses
Hi Niclolas,
Solr has no difficulty sorting on numeric fields if they are indexed as a
numeric type. Just use "=weight asc" If you're field is indexed as
text of course it won't sort properly, but then you should fix your schema.
-Gus
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 4:10 PM David Hastings
wrote:
>
Hi Folks,
I'm looking for ideas on how to speed up processing for a streaming
expression. I can't post the full details because it's customer related,
but the structure is shown here: https://imgur.com/a/98sENVT What that does
is take the results of two queries, join them and push them back into
Hi,
Are there any features that are only exclusive to SolrCloud?
e.g. when I am reading Streaming Expressions documentation, first sentence
there says 'Streaming Expressions provide a simple yet powerful stream
processing language for Solr Cloud.'
So, does this mean that streaming expressions
Not clearly understanding your question here. if your query is
q=kind:animal weight:50 you will get no results, as nothing matches
(assuming a q.op of AND)
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 4:06 PM Nicolas Paris
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a numeric field (say "weight") and I d'like to be able to get
>
Hi
I have a numeric field (say "weight") and I d'like to be able to get
results sorted.
q=kind:animal weight:50
pf=kind^2 weight^3
would return:
name=dog, kind=animal, weight=51
name=tiger, kind=animal,weight=150
name=elephant, kind=animal,weight=2000
In other terms how to deal with numeric
Hi,
I am working n doing a simple point upgrade from solr 7.6 to 7.7 cloud.
6 servers
3 zookeepers
one simple test collection using the prepackages _default config.
i stop all solr servers leaving the zookeepers up.
change out the binaries and put the solr.in.sh file back in place with
memory
I can’t find the original post right now, but putting a load balancer in front
of
Zookeeper is a really bad idea. Do not do that. There is a stateful protocol
between one client and one Zookeeper node. This is not a stateless protocol
that you can just bounce around between servers.
wunder
The other thing I would be curious about is in your reindexing process, do
you clear out the entire index before hand? if so perhaps there is content
missing/moved
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 11:07 AM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Basically, this is not possible ;). Therefore there's something I
> don't
Basically, this is not possible ;). Therefore there's something I
don't understand
There's nothing anywhere except what's in the index. By that I mean that _if_
you copy an index (the data directory and children) from one place to another,
that's all there is. No information about what's in
bq. 2. Did you take the solrconfig that came with 7.5 and modify it rather
than copy your 5.3 solrconfig?
No, We have adjusted existing 5.3.1 config when we used for couple years to
SOLR 7.5.0.
I don't think this is the root of your problem, but this is always
suspect. Not only
can the format of
Hi,
while trying to update from Solr 7.6 to 7.7 I run into some unexpected
incompatibilites with UpdateRequestProcessors.
The SolrInputDocument passed to UpdateRequestProcessor#processAdd does
not return Strings for string fields anymore but instances of
Hello All,
We have upgraded to solr from 6.6 to 7.6 and seeing null pointer exception
with DocExpirationUpdateProcessorFactory. Didn't see this issue in 6.6
version of solr. Not sure if any changes made to the
updateRequestProcessorChain in 7.6 version, can anyone please help?
2019-02-14
Thanks Erick, I just created SOLR-13247 and linked it to SOLR-12944.
- Bram
On 13/02/2019 18:31, Erick Erickson wrote:
> I haven't verified, but this looks like a JIRA to me. Looks like some
> of the create logic may have issues, see: SOLR-12944 and maybe link to
> that JIRA?
On 13/02/2019 12:17, Gareth Baxendale wrote:
This is perhaps more or an architecture question than dev code but
appreciate collective thoughts!
We are using Solr to order records and to categorise them to allow users to
search and find specific medical conditions. We have an opportunity to make
You may of course ignore the warning in the UI, it is just a warning intended
to help you avoid mis-configurations.
But there may be side effects of placing a load balancer in between client and
zk cluster, see
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30905007/load-balancer-with-zookeeper
--
Jan
Hello,
We are using Cloudera 5.12.1 with Solr 4.10.3.
We want to store our index in memory since HDFS where the data is
stored is to slow.
We were trying using Solr HDFS block cache, but we are struggling with
warming it to be sure that whole index is in memory after updating
some documents.
We
Here's the fix proposal is attached
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13126 appreciate reviews and
opinions.
I can push it quite soon if there's no veto.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 9:59 PM Burgmans, Tom <
tom.burgm...@wolterskluwer.com> wrote:
> I like to bump this issue up, since this is
23 matches
Mail list logo
