Re: Solr LTR model Performance Issues

HI Jörn Franke, Thanks for the quick reply. I have performed the jmeter load testing on one of the server for Linear vs Multipleadditive tree model. We are using lucidworks fusion. There is some business logic in the query pipeline followed by main solr ltr query. This is the total time taken by

Re: Need help on LTR

I think the issue is that you store the feature as originalScore but in your model you refer to it as original_score On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 1:58 PM Mohomed Rimash wrote: > one more thing i noticed is your feature params values doesn't wrap in q or > qf field. check that as well > > On Wed, 20

Re: CDCR issues

This might be causing the high CPU in 7.7.x. https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/eb652b84edf441d8369f5188cdd5e3ae2b151434#diff-e54b251d166135a1afb7938cfe152bb5 That is related to this JDK bug https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8129861. Thanks Jay Potharaju On Thu, Mar 21, 2019

Range query on multivalued string field results in useless highlighting

Range queries against mutivalued string fields produces useless highlighting, even though "hl.highlightMultiTerm":"true" I have uncovered what I believe is a bug. At the very lease it is a difference in behavior between Solr v5.1.0 and v7.5.0 (and v7.7.1). I have a Field defined in my schema

Re: Solr query high response time

On 3/22/2019 7:52 AM, Rajdeep Sahoo wrote: My solr query sometime taking more than 60 sec to return the response . Is there any way I can check why it is taking so much time . Please let me know if there is any way to analyse this issue(high response time ) .Thanks With the information

Re: [CAUTION] Re: Use of ShingleFilter causing very large BooleanQuery structures in Solr 7.1

On 3/22/2019 2:02 AM, Hubert-Price, Neil wrote: One other question Is there a system level configuration that can change the default for the sow= parameter? Can it be flipped to have the default set to true? Any parameter can be put into the query handler definition. In defaults,

Why is elevate not working when I convert a request to local parameters?

Should probably send this one from an anonymous email... :( I can see from the results that elevate is working with this: select?=edismax=transcript=my_field However, elevate is not working with this: select?={!edismax%20v=transcript%20qf=my_field} This is Solr 4.x...y, I know... What am I

Solr query high response time

Hi all, My solr query sometime taking more than 60 sec to return the response . Is there any way I can check why it is taking so much time . Please let me know if there is any way to analyse this issue(high response time ) .Thanks

Re: Solr LTR model Performance Issues

Can you share the time needed of the two models? How many documents? What is your loading pipeline? Have you observed cpu/memory? > Am 22.03.2019 um 12:01 schrieb Kamal Kishore Aggarwal : > > Hi, > > I am trying to use LTR with solr 6.6.2.There are different types of model > like Linear Model,

Solr LTR model Performance Issues

Hi, I am trying to use LTR with solr 6.6.2.There are different types of model like Linear Model, Multiple Additive Trees Model and Neural Network Model. I have tried using Linear & Multiadditive model and compared the performance of results. There is a major difference in response time between

Re: [CAUTION] Re: Use of ShingleFilter causing very large BooleanQuery structures in Solr 7.1

One other question Is there a system level configuration that can change the default for the sow= parameter? Can it be flipped to have the default set to true? Many Thanks, Neil On 22/03/2019, 08:36, "Hubert-Price, Neil" wrote: Thanks Erick, that makes sense. However it

Re: Use of ShingleFilter causing very large BooleanQuery structures in Solr 7.1

Thanks Erick, that makes sense. However it does lead me to another conclusion: in Solr prior to 6.0, or with sow=true on Solr 6.0+ that would mean that the ShingleFilter is totally ineffective within query analysers. It would be logically equivalent to not having the ShingleFilter