Hi, Paresh.
I'm afraid the only way is to join them back in post processing
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/transforming-result-documents.html#TransformingResultDocuments-_subquery_
Although, I'm not sure it will ever work with particular collections.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 3:42 PM
Hi Claire,
Unfortunately I didn't see anything in the debug explain that could
potentially be the source of the problem. As Saurabh, I tested on a core
and it worked for me.
I suggest that you simplify the solrconfig (commenting out qf, mm,
spellchecker config and pf, for example) and reload the
Another finding is, no matter how I tried to disable buffer with the
following setup on target node, it is always enabled first time.
disabled
Once I call CDCR API to disable buffer, it turns to be disabled. I wonder if
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11652 is related
Using Solr 7.7.3-snapshot, 1 shard + 3 replicas on source and target cluster
When unidirectional CDCR enabled and buffer disabled, my understanding is,
when data is successfully forwarded to target and committed, tlogs on both
source and target should be purged.
However, the source node doesn't
Your English is perfect.
I forwarded my response without your contact info.
I *do* follow solr-users but only certain key words like "spatial" (and
some other topics) and some words related to that domain (e.g. polygon,
etc.). I so your post would have gotten my attention.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020
My response to a direct email (copying here with permission):
It's possible; you'll certainly have to write some code here to make this
work, including some new Solr plugin; perhaps ValueSourceParser that can
compute a more accurate overlap. Such a thing would have to get the
Spatial4J Shape
Try looking at range JSON facets:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_2/json-facet-api.html#range-facet.
If you facet over the eventTimeStamp with a gap of 1 day, you should
then be able to use a sub facet to return a min and max value
It would be lovely to be able to use range to complete my searches, but sadly
documents aren't necessarily sequential so I might want say 18, 24 or 30 in
future.
I've re-run the query with debug on. Is there anything here that looks unusual?
Thanks.
{
"responseHeader":{
"status":0,
I hope you do not plan to use Solr as a primary repository. Solr is NOT a
database. If you use Solr as a database, you will lose data at some point.
The Solr feature set is very different from MySQL. There is no guarantee that a
SQL query can be translated into a Solr query.
wunder
Walter
Hi,
I have two collections: collection1 and collection2
I have fields like -
colleciton1: id, prop1, prop2, prop3
collection2: id, col1, col2, col3
I am doing a join query with collection1.prop1 = collection2.col1 on
collection2.
As a result, I can get any field from collection2 in 'fl'.
Is
Hi team,
We are migrating from mysql to apache solr since solr is fast in searching.
Thank you. We had a scenario to
> *find 1) difference (max-min)*
*2) with group by date(timeStamp)*
Given below is our mysql table :
[image: Untitled.png]
And mysql query is,
*SELECT
I have to admit it was the cache. Sorry I believed I deleted it. Thanks for the
efforts and testing ! I will update the Jira.
> Am 07.01.2020 um 22:14 schrieb Jörn Franke :
>
>
> here you go:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14176
>
> a detailed screenshot of the message can be
12 matches
Mail list logo
