Hello, Solr community members:
I am working on translating Solr's release note every release.
Now, I am not clear about what SOLR-14471 actually fixes.
URL for SOLR-14471: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14471
My questions are the following.
- what does "all inherently equivalent grou
Thank you very much Erick, Emir, and Bram this is extremly useful advice I
sincerely appreciate everyone’s input!
Before I received your responses I ran a controlled DBQ test in our DR
environment and exactly what you said occurred. It was like reading a step by
step playbook of events with h
26 May 2020, Apache Solr™ 8.5.2 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 8.5.2
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search, hit highlighting, faceted sea
fine, I'l try to write simple test, thanks
On utorok 26. mája 2020 17:44:52 CEST David Smiley wrote:
> Please create an issue. I haven't reproduced it yet but it seems unlikely
> to be user-error.
>
> ~ David
>
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 9:28 AM Michal Hlavac wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have
Did you have SSL enabled with 8.2.1?
The error looks common to certificate handling and not specific to Solr.
I would verify that you have no extra characters in your certificate file
(including line endings) and that the keystore type that you specified
matches the file you are presenting (JKS o
Hello team,
We have 4 Solr VMs in Solr Cloud 7.4. Only a specific node Admin UI, we are
seeing the message,
· cs_signals_shard1_replica_n1:
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:
Error opening new searcher
When restarting Solr, noticed below error fo
On 26/05/2020 14:07, Erick Erickson wrote:
> So best practice is to go ahead and use delete-by-id.
I've noticed that this can cause issues when using implicit routing, at
least on 7.x. Though I can't quite remember whether the issue was a
performance issue, or whether documents would sometimes n
: Subject: TimestampUpdateProcessorFactory updates the field even if the value
: if present
:
: Hi,
:
: Following is the update request processor chain.
:
: <
: processor class="solr.TimestampUpdateProcessorFactory"> index_time_stamp_create
:
: And, here is how the field is defined in
Please create an issue. I haven't reproduced it yet but it seems unlikely
to be user-error.
~ David
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 9:28 AM Michal Hlavac wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have field:
> stored="true" indexed="false" storeOffsetsWithPositions="true"/>
>
> and configuration:
> true
> unified
> true
>
Have been using SOLR for almost five years. Great, powerful software.
Thanks to all the developers for this masterpiece.
Appreciate it,
Serkan
Without getting too in the weeks with our product, we have a bunch of solr
records that represent entities and their relationships to other entities or
files. For example a document may describe a bunch of people. We have entries
for the people as well as the document. We also have entries that
Hi Walter,
thanks for your response.
That sounds like a feasible approach, although I would like to keep the stack
as small as possible.
But the direction that you pointed out seems promising, the JDBC issues with
log4j2 don't seem to lead anywhere.
Kind Regards,
Florian
-Original Message
Hi All,
We are coming across a strange bug in the Analysis section of the Admin UI. For
our non-English schema components, instead of the Synonym Graph Filter (SGF)
showing in the UI, it's showing something called a "List Based Token Stream"
(LBTS) in its place. We found an old issue that docum
Dwane:
DBQ for very large deletes is “iffy”. The problem is this: Solr must lock out
_all_ indexing for _all_ replicas while the DBQ runs and this can just take a
long time. This is just a consequence of distributed computing. Imagine a
scenario where one of the documents affected by the DBQ is
Hi Dwane,
DBQ does not play well with concurrent updates - it’ll block updates on
replicas causing replicas to fall behind, trigger full replication and
potentially OOM. My advice is to go with cursors (or even better use some DB as
source of IDs) and DBID with some batching. You’ll need some te
It Depends (tm). Often, you can create a single (albeit, perhaps complex)
SQL query that does this for you and just process the response.
I’ve also seen situations where it’s possible to hold one of the tables
in memory on the client and just use that rather than a separate query.
It depends on
Thanks Eric.
We were able successfully restored deleted collection data as suggested. In
fact tried both approaches as below & both worked fine:
1) Create collection with same number of shards and replication factor = 1
2) Create collection with same number of shards and same replication factor
17 matches
Mail list logo
