Hi all,
We have been using SynonymFilterFactory with Solr 7.3. It seems to be
working,
Going through the documentation for 8.6, I noticed that it was deprecated a
long time ago, probably before 7.3
The documentation at this url, for version 8.6 -
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_6/field-type
Current Configuration
Solr Version: 7.5.0
Operating mode: solrcloud
Number of shards: 1
Configuration of nodes:
1 tlog reader (static)
One tlog replica (static)
Multiple pull replicas (started dynamically by AutoScalingGroup in aws)
Startup activity :
1. instance launched by AutoScalingGroup of
In high throughput situations that can be a problem. The entire
packet has to be assembled and transmitted over the network. This
can cause grief in many situations.
Not to mention that for “regular” queries, say using the /select or /query
handlers and assuming you’re getting
one or more stored-
"Oh, and returning 100K docs is an anti-pattern, if you really need that
many docs consider cursorMark and/or Streaming."
er, i routinely ask for 2+ million records into a single file based on a
query. I mean not into a web application or anything, its meant to be
processed after the fact, but so
I don’t think there’s really a canned way to do what you’re asking. A custom
DocTransformer would probably do the trick though.
You could also create a custom QueryComponent that examined the docs being
returned and inserted a blank field for a selected number of fields (possibly
configurable i
Thanks so much. Is there any other way to return the data value if it exists,
otherwise an empty string? I'm integrating this with a 3rd party app which I
can't change. When the field is null it isn't showing up in the output.
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson
Sent: Wednesday,
The “def” function goes after the _indexed_ value, so that’s what you’re
getting back. Try just specifying “fl=INSTRUCTIONS”, and if the value is stored
that should return the original field value before any analysis is done.
Why are you using the def function? If the field is absent from the do
I am sure I'm doing something silly. Basically it looks like my data is being
altered upon search.
This is my fieldType:
I have a string field called "INSTRUCTIONS" using this field type that looks
like this:
ABC_D= PAYM
Thanks for that Colvin. Even though it's a bit dated but it sure does help
in getting an idea.
I definitely remember seeing a list of these sorts of blogs somewhere a
> long time ago... don't know where though
>
By any chance you stumble upon it, please feel free to share even at a
later date.
On
>
>
> Hi Naz and other solr-users (now with solr-user in to),
>
> Excuse my ignorance here (just getting started) but let's take the
> techproducts example. As you proposed I included the latest jackson-core
> and jackson-databind jars in the "solr install dir/lib/" directory:
>
> [tijmen@solr-1 so
10 matches
Mail list logo